Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
03.21.2008 7:58 pm

On Dick Pound, Lance Armstrong, Floyd Landis, the NHL and UCI

Saint Louis Post-Dispatch

If nothing else, this news should make Lance Armstrong happy. Dick Pound, the former head of the World Anti-Doping Agency, has been sued by cycling’s international governing body, the Union Cycliste Internationale, for alleged derogatory comments by Pound.

This would be welcome news to Armstrong because after a French newspaper wrote that Armstrong’s old doping-control samples from the Tour de France allegedly contained traces of EPO, Pound famously said: “Now an onus is on Lance Armstrong and the others to explain how it is EPO got into their systems.” Armstrong responded by calling for Pound’s dismissal from WADA.

Pound, a former VP of the International Olympic Committee and a one-time candidate for commissioner of the National Hockey league (he lost to Gary Bettman), also once said that a third of NHL players were doping, which earned him rebuke from Bettman and the NHL

Interestingly, though outspoken about drug use in sports and athletes suspected of doping, Pound is a candidate to become president of CAS, the Court of Arbitration for Sports — i.e. an athlete’s court of last resort in appealing doping cases. Yes, an outspoken anti-doping crusader, in a system where athletes have to prove their innocence through invasive testing, might head the group that is supposed to be impartial.

Good thing Floyd Landis’ case is being appealed now, considering what Pound said about the thoroughly botched 11-to-1 testosterone-to-epitestosterone finding by the  French lab that prompted the loss of Landis’ 2006 Tour de France title and his suspension but that was subsequently tossed out as unreliable by both the majority and minority opinions in Landis’ first appeal.

Said Pound, according to the New York Times:  “I mean, it was 11 to 1. … You’d think he’d be violating every virgin within 100 miles. How does he even get on his bicycle?”

A better question would be how the French lab received WADA accreditation, considering the slipshod procedures revealed in the Landis case. I’m just sayin’.

In any event, here’s the Associated press story about the UCI suit …

Cycling body sues former WADA president Dick Pound over ’biased comments’ on doping

AIGLE, Switzerland (AP) — Cycling’s governing body sued Dick Pound over critical comments by the former president of the World Anti-Doping Agency.

The International Cycling Union and former president Hein Verbruggen lodged a complaint in a Swiss court regarding Pound’s “continual injurious and biased comments.” The dispute centers on Pound’s criticism of UCI and Verbruggen in combating doping in cycling.

Pound stepped down this year after heading WADA for eight years. He has regularly clashed with Verbruggen and the UCI over the doping scandals that have rocked the sport.

In explaining its action, the UCI said Pound has “publicly questioned the extent of the UCI’s efforts in the fight against doping.”

Pound did not immediately respond Friday to a message left by The Associated Press. The Canadian is currently running for the presidency of the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, Switzerland, which has settled a number of high-profile doping cases in cycling.

–30–

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 4.67 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
4 comments

Comments are closed.

At 56, I still ride cat-3, and have done so for nearly 30 years. I accomplish this as a father, grandfather, and full time professional worker. My family and friends are proud.

Since I have to occasionally use Albuteral for exercise induced asthma - EIA - I would too, probably be suspected of doping (Alessandro Petacchi was; he has EIA).

It’s sad that I once had respect for Pound; his suspicions regarding Marion Jones and steroids was on the money. However, I now feel nothing but disdain, since he began his crusade at WADA against cycling. Evidently, in his estimation, cycling is the only sport guilty of doping.

I can’t imagine a more undisciplined, catty, … lawyer than Pound. …

— Chuck in Florida
7:00 pm March 22nd, 2008

Asthma. I commend you for riding at your level. That’s gotta be tough.

Albuteral is allowed for therapeutic use. I think Petacchi got in trouble because the reading in his system was above a defined amount, tho I don’t know what that level is … and I think he eventually was exonerated.

I heard nothing but good things about Dick Pound in my previous life as a hockey writer, and his appointment to WADA seemed to be a good thing. Some of his statements seem way over the top, especially coming from a man in his position.

Though I proudly wear my Dopers Suck socks (son of 10 Speed gave me two pairs for Christmas), I find the guilty-until-proven-innocent format of anti-doping objectionable. I guess that’s the American jurisprudence in me.

— Dave Luecking
10:20 pm March 22nd, 2008

I, myself , am sick of even hearing the name Dick Pound and I hope he is never given any more power. I think he should be thanking Lance Armstrong for all he did in and for the sport of Cycling. I never cared anything about cycling until I watched Lance ride a few years back , and then, I was hooked. I have never believed in “quilty until proven innocent”, but Lance was certainly tagged that. Now, that being said, he has always said that he was not quilty of doping and the courts ruled in his favor. Now, whether you believe he was quilty or not, he is innocent and has passed every test ever taken by him…..So, BY CYCLING’S OWN RULES…HE IS INNOCENT!!!! ENOUGH SAID! Thanks, Tina

— Tina
11:55 pm March 22nd, 2008

This trial is most probably bad news for UCI - I can’t believe Verbruggen wants to risk having to open the books of UCI contributors in the court of law. If Pound is able to use those in his defense, it will probably confirm what was being said behind a closed door SCA hearing, that Lance Armstrong gave significant Sums of Money to UCI, the very agency that should be impartial on doping controls.

Just because Pound says some very brash things that are picked up in the press, does not mean that his accusations are that far off.

Most casual cycling fans would rather let the doping continue and hush up about it. Dick Pound made the issue very public and made people accountable for their actions and cover up.

— IAR
12:56 am March 23rd, 2008