Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.10.2008 8:00 am

The new bike lanes in St. Louis

Saint Louis Post-Dispatch

Ain’t it cool that Bike St. Louis has added 57 miles to its on-street trail system, for a total of 77 miles on top of the many car-free trails throughout the area?

If Bike St. Louis encourages more people to ride their bikes and leave their vehicles at home, I’m definitely all for it.

But these lanes, particularly the dedicated bike lanes, come with a common-sense cavaet: Be super careful.

Why? Dedicated bike lanes can offer a false sense of security for cyclists and motorists.

On these streets, the dedicated bike lanes are to the right of traffic lanes, which means a vehicle in the lane to the left of a cyclist can turn right. Considering traffic generally is prohibited from turning right from left-hand lanes, many cyclists find it counter-intuitive at best and dangerous at worst to allow vehicles to turn right from the lane to the left.

I hope cyclists remain vigilant about their safety in dedicated bike lanes. Same with motorists, who must be as aware of what or who might be in the dedicated bike lane to their right as they are of traffic in the lane directly in front of them.  

At least with shared bike-car lanes, cyclists will be directly in front of cars and in drivers’ line of sight. In fact, for me, I feel safer riding in those lanes than in dedicated bike lanes. I’m a big fella — 6-4, 2$% pounds — and wearing ridiculously colorful cycling garb, I’m fairly difficult to miss … in the right way, I hope.

Cyclists using dedicated bike lanes also need to be aware of parked cars. If a driver-side door is opened suddenly, it could be directly in the path of a cyclist in the dedicated bike lane. A danger at any speed.

So cyclists have to be cognizant of what’s happening on both sides of them while using dedicated bike lanes: cars in the left lane potentially turning right; and drivers or passengers in parked cars to the right potentially opening doors into the bike lane.

Long story short: Be careful out there, whether using a dedicated lane or a shared lane — marked or unmarked. For motorists, remember, every surface street is by law a shared lane, and cyclists have the right to be there.

–30–

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
5 comments

Comments are closed.

Yes, it is great the new lanes for bicyclists. But why do 95 % of cyclists REFUSE to stop at stop signs and stop lights? Shouldn’t they have to follow the same rule as motorists, Motor cyclists, and pedestrians?

— Michael Draga
9:22 am May 11th, 2008

The figure of 95% is a bit high I think but the answer would be for the same reason 10% of the cars don’t stop. Anyway….yes the lanes are nice and it is great for PR but how many people does this really effect? There needs to be an effort like this out in the counties. For me to ride to work requires a North County start and a Hampton/ Arsenal area finish. This is OK on weekends but in the morning might be a bit dicey and in end of day traffic could be fatal. I use Hanley and Manchester. Anyone have some good ideas.

— Jeffrey Cook
7:55 am May 12th, 2008

When I lived in St. Louis there weren’t any bike lanes in the area I took riding to and from work (Crestwood to The St. Louis Science Center and back) but there were a lot of little-used roads which were perfect for me.

What do you think of the rating Missouri got from the Bicycle Federation? I know down where I currently live it makes 100% sense to me. Cape Girardeau and Jackson are still in the growing stages but are growing as most modern cities do (in such a way which it makes it hard for anyone not driving to get around). They have one pedestrian/cycling trail which was built using left over land which makes it harder for a creek in town to flood which I used a little bit to get to and from work for a while but I didn’t particularly care for it. It wouldn’t get me to the college (my other main drive), for instance.

— athenebelle
5:02 pm May 12th, 2008

I moved here recently and started commuting on my bike last week from Chesterfield to Forest Park. I take Ladue in but I have to say that compared with other places I have lived that had really great bike trails from outlying areas into downtown, St. Louis definitely deserves the D. (In Salt Lake City, 13 of my 21 miles were along a bike trail with NO cars and only two or three road crossings). Here, there aren’t any roads - Conway/Ladue/Olive on my way in that have bike lanes and neither Conway or Ladue even have shoulders to ride in (the road ends two inches from the white line). I feel that I am putting my life on the line just so I can get some of the benefits mentioned in the news article yesterday. What good are the health and financial benefits if I get hit by a car and end up with health problems and paying hospital and medical bills? Anyway, I’m still going to ride because I think it is the right thing to do. I’m hoping it gets better soon!

— Cindy
4:45 pm May 13th, 2008

Ah, you’re from the land of David Zabriskie — Salt Lake City. He started his “Yield To Life” nonprofit after being hit 3 times by cars in and around Salt Lake City. Dude rides all over the world, and the only times he has been hit is in his hometown. Go figure.

Anyway, Ladue was very good for cyclists until the center turn lane was added. This center turn lane was added so as not to back up traffic during the Highway 40 shutdown. Have you tried Clayton Road? Does Olive have a bike lane?

I commend you for commuting from Chesterfield. Stay safe out there, wear the brightest colors you can find (road-crew green is ridiculously transucent these days) and enjoy the ride.

— Dave Luecking
11:58 am May 15th, 2008