Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
09.08.2008 7:40 pm

A comeback for Armstrong?

Saint Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

A rumor about a comeback by seven-time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong has been flitting around in cyberspace for a while, and Velonews.com’s Neal Rogers reports that a comeback is indeed in the works.

According to Rogers, Armstrong will appear in five races — the Tour of California and the Tour de Georgia in the U.S. and  Paris-Nice, the Dauphine Libre and the Tour de France. He would make his comeback for Astana, which is basically his old United Postal/Discovery Channel team rebranded under the Khazakstan sponsorship and operated by his old boss, Johan Bruyneel. And Astana rides on Armstrong’s favored bike brand, Trek.

The most interesting aspect of Rogers’ scoop is that Armstrong has registered with the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, which requires a six-month lead-up of testing before competition, and that he would make all of his anti-doping testing available via the Internets.

And therein might be the primary reason Armstrong would come back. Armstrong was dogged by rumors of doping throughout his run of seven TdF titles, and the noise hasn’t abated in his retirement, and in fact, almost has gotten worse, particularly with his public jousting with three-time TdF winner Greg LeMond.

Armstrong always has insisted that he raced clean, and perhaps a comeback could put those suspicions to rest if he would do the unthinkable and win again, after a three-Tour absence, with his anti-doping records available for public consumption.

But then again, if Armstrong came back and failed to keep up, critics would use that against him and say that he couldn’t win clean, so therefore he must of doped, etc. etc.

Be that as it may, an Armstrong comeback would be exciting for the drama if nothing else. The big question would be whether the Tour de France would even want him back. Many in France think he doped, and tests on some old samples from ‘99 supposedly came up positive for EPO a few years ago, tho the tests were conducted outside of World Anti-Doping Agency protocol.

Many, including me, suspected that the TdF’s decision not to invite Astana to the race this year had as much to do with the organizers’ feelings about Armstrong and Bruyneel as it had to do with their publicly stated reason of past doping offenses by Astana riders under previous management. So, it wouldn’t surprise me in the least if Armstrong announced a comeback on Astana, and the Tour told Astana to stay away again. That would be as ridiculous as the Tour essentially barring ‘07 champ Alberto Contador this year with Astana, but considering the organizers’ track record, you can’t discount the possibility.

According to Rogers, Armstrong’s announcement is expected to come in an upcoming issue of Vanity Fair. For its part, Astana denied the report to the Associated Press, and cyclingnews.com quoted Bruyneel as saying he didn’t knew where the rumors were coming from.

–30–

9 comments

Comments are closed.

Has anyone warned the Armadillo’s?

— Weaves 54
7:57 am September 9th, 2008

Well I would have to disagree with your assertion that Astana was not invited because of the presence of Bruyneel and the lingering odor of Mr. Armstrong. That arrogant contention was voiced by both. The fact that the previous year the “same” team had two embarrassing non-negative tests was sufficient for me, especially since they involved Astana’s top two riders.

Now if you want to discuss Mr. Armstrong’s contention that he never doped, I have a picture I can send you. It is a trio of riders in the Alps with Mr. Armstrong in the lead. The others? Basso and Ulrich, both dopers, although in the former’s case it was only “intended” doping. Yea, right and what about Basso’s performance at the Giro a month earlier?

How many former Posties have been busted? How many others who have tested positive did he “beat” in the Alps or Pyrennes?

My theory is that Mr. Armstrong got out when he was no longer assured that whatever he was using could not be detected. To bad they could not have “Ricco’d” him…..

Why is it that here recently the peloton in the Grio, TdF and Vuelta have had so many different cyclists in the leaders jersey? Why is it that the times are slower? (especially of a lot of the former big names)…

And Albert Contador should have been doing backflips for his team not being invited after the “only man that could stay with him” in the mountains of the Giro this year was busted after winning two TdF stages.

But I guess adoration without investigation sells more newsprint…

dwp
Texan, living in Stuttgart, Germany

— Dave P
8:03 am September 9th, 2008

Yoh, Texan,

The chink in the Astana-not-invited-to-Tour-for-past-doping-issues is that Cofidis got booted, and T-Mobile, Saunier Duval and Rabobank had scandals at the TdF in 07, yet all were invited back. Makes no sense to signal out one and not the others, so perhaps there’s more to the Astana story.

As for photographs, I’ve seen photos that include Floyd and Tyler, too, but so what? Have we Nancy Graced to the point in the U.S. where we convict people because they’ve had their picture taken with the wrong crowd? If so, I wonder about those photos of Rosalyn Carter with that clown Gacy in Chicago.

I don’t know whether the Texan will actually return, but it’ll be great theatre, and maybe he’s just playin’ with everybody and doin’ a little Brett Favre action to test the waters.

Oh, and this post didn’t appear on newsprint. Only online. It’s a blog. So, there’s a faulty assumption on your part, so therefore everything you’ve ever assumed must be wrong! Just joshin’.

— Dave Luecking
9:48 am September 9th, 2008

Dave L,

Well it is almost like deja vu…. I seem to be talking errrr, blogging to myself of three years ago… cause I was a huge LA fan and swore he was clean… and yes, this “theater” has a real Farve “stink” to it… (not a big Farve fan either)….

Ahhh, your “history” of TdF 2007 is a bit biased… Rasmussen was not thrown out by the Tour, he was fired by Rabobank… Cofidis immediately canned Moreni, as S-D did with Mayo (oh remember him? another LA foe)….

The left Astana with VINO and KASCHESKIN (sp?) testing positive for blood transfusions… OK, I am no doctor, and I don’t play one on TV, but would not two of your best riders and one who won a spectacular TT really embarass ASO and the TdF? That type of embarrassment costs both… And the fact it was a “transfusion” instantly reflects more than one person was there hence “conspiracy”.

And what no comment on Contador? Poor fella, having a bit of a problem at the Vuelta…

Oh, and your cmments on Hamilton and Landis are spot on…. further “evidence” by the company you keep? No, by the company you beat….

I realize ASO has taken a beating in the US press but why is it it seems that racers at the Tour are the only ones testing positive?

More later…

dwp

— Dave P
10:10 am September 9th, 2008

Actually, Kashechkin was busted after the TdF.

All of those teams in 07 embarrassed the tour because of their knucklehead riders. It isn’t fair to single out one over the others. Take ‘em all or take none of ‘em.

And what are you saying about Contador? That if he wins, he must have doped? And if he didn’t, he must not have?

— Dave Luecking
1:54 pm September 9th, 2008

OK, so Kasheshkin was indeed busted out of competition, the point I was trying to make was that while injecting EPO or CERA or Micera using a syringe is a more personal activity, blood transfusions suggest the involvement of others… hence conspiracy.

I still agree with ASO to NOT invite ASTANA. and NOT because they are the “re-flagged darling of the peloton”, Discovery / Postal…. (I did enjoy wearing my “DISCO Sucks” shirt at the races, imagine keeping it from 1978)… but because the name ASTANA belonged to a team which embarrassed the more than the others….

Contador - OK, let’s pretend that he was not excluded from the 2006 TdF because he was “allegedly” connected to Operation Puerto. Let’s pretend that the big names associated with Operation Puerto were investigated thoroughly by the countries holding their respective licenses… Let’s pretend that the Spanish are serious about doping and investigate these allegations (not only the 30% cyclists, but the other 70% of other professional sports), oh wait, I cannot really say Spain is serious about doping…..

Other than Sella who was able to “hang” with Contador in the Dolomites in May 0f 2008? And if I recall Contador was a “late” entry into the competition, how was he able to do so well?
I think Alberto was doing back flips and breathing a huge sigh of relief for NOT being at the TdF after Ricco got busted. And he does not seem to “dominate” in the Vuelta as he did in the TdF in 2007 or the Giro earlier this year….

But who knows, maybe Rock Racing can pair LA with Hamilton and add Basso, Landis, Vino, Kasheshkin, Ullrich, Mayo, Virenque, and Heras, (just to name a few)….

It is not the company you keep, but the company you beat!

dwp

— Dave P
2:49 am September 10th, 2008

Yes, I suppose everyone should be convicted based on suspicion, accusation and innuendo. It’s the new American way!

— Dave Luecking
12:26 pm September 10th, 2008

You’re right, lets allow emotion and adoration continue to blind us, instead of an analytical “connecting the dots”.

dwp

PS - Good call on Vande Velde… I am happy he is doing well this year, and having fun doing it…

PPS - You know on the ride to work this morning I was thinking of following LA. You reckon there would be interest in a documentary following a 53 year old, over weight, 30 year smoker (quit in April with a huge thanks to Team CSC) who realizes he wants to race professionally?

dwp

— Dave P
8:18 am September 11th, 2008

I’m down with that. I’ll be your lead-out man.

— Dave Luecking
8:22 pm September 12th, 2008