Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
04.15.2009 12:13 pm

Article examines reactions to biracial kiss, why this blog exists

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

Why does A Conversation about Race exist?

Poynter, the media training center, tackles that question in an article today titled “Biracial Couple Photo Sparks Negative Comments on Post-Dispatch Blog.”

In her Diversity at Work blog on Poynter.orgMallary Jean Tenore examines the reactions to last Friday’s  GO! cover and the reader comments on Doug Moore’s blog post last week.

Much of her article is devoted to an interview with Kurt Greenbaum about why this blog exists. Greenbaum is director of social media for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and STLtoday.com.  Here’s that part of the interview:

Mallary Tenore: Talk a little bit about your motivation behind starting “A Conversation about Race.”

Kurt Greenbaum: We started to allow comments on our stories last August. Since that time, I’ve watched some story comments (not most; some) devolve into discussions of race or approach overt racism. Well before that, I’ve watched comments on our forums devolve in a similar way.

So, for quite a while, the idea of having a place to actually talk specifically about race was simmering in my brain. The story comments really brought it to the front burner. I gathered a group in our newsroom to discuss the idea. I also spoke to Dawn Turner Trice at the Chicago Tribune, who writes a similar blog, “Exploring Race,” to pick her brain about it.

I also spoke to someone in our community who is involved in a “Dismantling Racism” program offered by the Episcopal Diocese of Missouri. All of those discussions informed how we put this together.

Tenore: Some of the comments on the blog suggest that people are tired of talking about race. One commenter, for instance, wrote: “YAWN. I’m done w/ this subject for the rest of my life.” Have you found that a lot of readers share this sentiment?

Greenbaum: Yes; absolutely. One of the big recurring themes in the comments is whether this means we’re done. Race isn’t an issue. Move on. Yet we see race-related issues that come up — like the Go! cover story — and they generate discussion, so we know it’s not a dead topic.

Tenore: How often do you respond to the comments, and how do you moderate them, if at all?

Greenbaum: Personally, I respond only occasionally — not as often as I probably should. Our bloggers are aware that they can and they are encouraged to do so. But I don’t think we do often enough at this point.

When a reader posts his or her first comment, it is flagged and does not go live until a blogger has reviewed it. Once someone has had an approved comment, their remarks go live immediately. All the bloggers get an e-mail when a comment is posted on their items and deal with them as needed.

We have agreed among us that if we really want to invite candid conversation, we’ll allow readers to post comments that might make us uncomfortable because they are intolerant or prejudiced. We will not allow comments that use hateful expressions such as the “n word.”

Tenore: The blog, and the paper, was criticized last week for allowing some hateful comments about the Go! story to remain on the site. How representative is this of the feedback you’ve gotten overall about the blog?

Greenbaum:
Beyond the feedback in the comments, I have heard from representatives of a couple of community organizations who were generally complimentary of the effort and expressed a willingness to work with us on it. None of that has borne fruit just yet.

Some of the comments are very positive and encouraging about it. I would describe traffic to the blog as “good, but not blockbuster.” It’s around the middle of the pack for our stable of blogs. We have more than 50 staff-produced blogs on our site that generate 600,000 to 700,000 pageviews a week. Sports and politics leads the pack. This blog is in the top 15 or 20 on a weekly basis.

Tenore:
Do you think blogs about race work?

Greenbaum: Good question. I think it’s too soon to tell. I guess it depends on what we mean by “work.” Our expressed goal for this blog was simply to provide a forum for discussion of topical issues and invite readers’ views on the issue. It was also our intention that the blog would help us expose issues and questions that we could follow up on with stories.

The paper, for instance, is now working on a story about the state of biracial relationships in St. Louis based on the response it got when it opened up the conversation to readers in the “Conversation about Race” blog post.

Tenore: Aside from starting the blog, have you done anything to reach out to those who are opposed to/tired of talking about race? Should journalists even bother to do so?

Greenbaum: Certainly. I’m not sure what that “something more” is just now. One step at a time. We have a reporter dedicated to covering diversity — and he is a contributor to this blog. So he is among those who will benefit from hearing the discussion; it can help him shape how he covers the issue. I’m not aware of anything else we have done specifically to reach out to people who are opposed to or tired of talking about race.

You know, my original thinking about this was almost like Edward R. Murrow “outing” Sen. Joseph McCarthy with his own words. Would it be possible to expose the folly of racism, intolerance and bigotry by letting people go? Our conversations about it evolved the concept into something a little more sustainable, but that’s always in the back of my mind.

I find it interesting that people who profess to be tired of it nonetheless come back for more. Perhaps if they’ll continue to participate, they will hear something that influences them. Minds have been changed in the past.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
69 comments

Comments are closed.

Mr. Greenbaum the reason as I see it, all these post get back to racial disharmony is there is truth and some people don’t like the truth. Another item. Any political obserervation concerning any non white group are conceded top secret/classified. I.e. crimes committed in the schools by those thugs that are not to be spoken about. They will defend it to their determent out of fear of being labeled a racist. They would rather put millions into a failing school system then risk telling those that destroy that school system they need to change their approach to becoming educated.

— The gov is killing me
12:53 pm April 15th, 2009

‘We will not allow comments that use hateful expressions such as the “n word.”’ (Kurt Greenbaum)

Appropriate stance…yet that would be a wonderful topic for a blog topic.

Why is the ‘N-word’ appropriate for use by blacks - and blacks only? Why is it acceptable at all?

As a (caucasian) boy growing up in University City in the late 1960’s/early 1970’s, I heard that word virtually every day on the playground - and it ALWAYS came out of the mouths of blacks. I NEVER heard it come out of the mouths of white folks. That mystified me as a 12-year-old; it continues to mystify me as a 48-year-old.

The rationale I’ve heard for years is that if its use is concentrated only within black America, the ’sting’ is taken out of it.

From my perspective, the ’sting’ is taken out of it - but by defending its usage, ‘ignorance’ has stepped in and taken the place of the ’sting.’

I remember the freewheeling discussion on ‘The View’ last year over this issue. Elizabeth Hasselback was desperately trying to understand why that word is even in use (in rap music/comedy) and, while in tears, talking about having to explain that word to her children (who ultimately hear it pop music) - while Whoopi Goldberg and Sherri Shepherd were each defending its usage - but, of course, only by African-Americans. Ms. Goldberg used the word profusely during the broadcast (bleeped each time).

I found the irony amazing.

Here’s Ms. Hasselback, a conservative white woman, desperately trying to shield her children from that word, desiring to truly be ‘judged by the content of her character’ by never using that awful term, while Ms. Shepherd and Ms. Goldberg, two liberal black women, cheerfully defending its use; Ms. Goldberg using the word as though there wasn’t even an issue.

I will go to my grave trying to understand modern-day liberalism.

MLK would be rotating in his grave if he saw pop culture today…

— John C
2:06 pm April 15th, 2009

John C raises an important question, and (to give him credit) it is one that Sylvester Brown attempted to raise in this space. Is it possible for Blacks to be racists? And, as long as there are double standards for things like the “n” word, then this rift will never close.

“gov” raises another important question: what IS the truth here? And who can tell it? MLK was a strong proponent of speaking truth to power, was he not? Who is speaking truth to power today? And, does the black leadership in this country need to start telling the truth amongst themselves? Don’t get me wrong, I’m not one to go totally towards ‘pull yourself up by the bootstraps’ philosophy, but until we get past blaming we can’t get to problem-solving. History is useful right up until it starts blaming…then it is useless.

By the way, PD staff: what happened to the listing of how many comments were under each post on the index page?

— hs
5:39 pm April 15th, 2009

racism is not a thing of the past. one of the biggest stumbling blocks in the discussion of race is the unwillingness of white people to listen. white america deserves much of the blame for minorities struglles both past and present. we need to listen to the grievances of people of color. they are real. to not listen, and to dismiss them as if they are playing “the blame game” says that we know your reality better than you do. And the whole “n” word use is a non-issue. Its a fall back arguement used to avoid the real issues facing black people. lets talk about the bias in housing, education, employment, and the legal system. and mlk did speak the truth. he also spoke of paying reparations to black people, spoke how capitalism is counter-productive to democracy, and that the US is the largest purveyor of violence in the world. We should also look at these mlk ideas, not just the sanitized version that we are offered today.

— clyde
7:52 pm April 15th, 2009

@hs: Re: your comments, “what happened to the listing of how many comments were under each post on the index page?”

We were wondering the same thing. I asked our tech guys about that awhile ago.

— Kurt Greenbaum
8:11 pm April 15th, 2009

clyde: when a white person gets hung out to dry for using the N word, looses a job, etc., while people of color use it indiscriminately amongst themselves and in public, it is NOT a side issue. I hold myself to a high moral standard of language and how I treat people. Do you?

I agree with you to a point. The grievances ARE real, the pain IS real. I’m convinced, however, that it’s not about needing more programs. Racism will end when any two people can sit across a table from each other, share a meal and a laugh together, talk about their children and their hopes and their dreams together. In other words, racism will end when you and I (clyde, I’m assuming you’re a person of color…forgive me if I err) can look each other in the eye and see another person.

— hs
8:48 pm April 15th, 2009

The choice of a biracial couple was no accident. I am tired of being force-fed images of white women with black men. It reeks of indoctrination.

— Riley DeWiley
10:11 pm April 15th, 2009

Let give you a incident that happen to me a few years ago.

I, being a white person was talking to another person him being Black.
The Black man was very educated more then I He had a degree in whatever.
We were discussing education in the city and that I thought the black kids were not fullfiling their part of the social contract. He said why are you being judgmental? I quoted Dr. King. Paraphrase “judge me not by my skin color but the content of my character” they in my opinion showed lack of character. He looked at me and said “You have no right to quote Dr.King” My jaw drop to my knees, and I thought I heard everything.

This people is systemic to the problems in our country where we have educated black people and lots of white people that take a position of your not allowed to graze in their field, it’s for the black cows only.

— The gov is killing me
6:18 am April 16th, 2009

hs

actually, i am white. no need to ask forgiveness. i thought about what you said, and how racism will end when any two people can share a meal and talk together and just see two people, to paraphrase. While you show an end, how do we get to that end? it is not so simple. I saw a study where people (black and white people) were shown images for 1/30th of a second. when images were shown, certain areas of the brain were increasingly active. when shown an image of a black man, peoples “fear” zone of the brain showed an increase in activity. why is there this inherent fear of black people? is it because of the “liberal” media that constantly shows us images of shirtless black men being arrested by police? the “liberal” media that says obama transcended race? when did a white politician EVER have to transcend race. Just because civil rights laws were passed does not mean that 400+ years wanting to supress a group of people has magically disappeared. instead of jim crow, the government now uses the war on drugs to keep black people in check. that is why mlk’s idea of reparations interests me. i think that would be an ideal starting point to heal the racial divide. if you are interested, i will expand on that. if not, i understand.

— clyde
7:41 am April 16th, 2009

Clyde, I remember seeing a movie a couple years ago, I don’t remember the title. It starred Samuel L Jackson and Juliette Binoche and chronicled the breaking of apartheid in South Africa. The key point was the ‘truth and reconciliation’ hearings. Where people of both races were encouraged (forced in some cases) to tell the truth about what had happened, what their part had been, and to ask for forgiveness and reconciliation.

I have a major problem with reparations at the public level. My reasoning is that “I” have not, at least not consciously and deliberately, done anything that was racially motivated. My ancestors didn’t come to this country until after the civil war. My parents were very involved in the civil rights push of the early-mid 60’s, and I was taught that racism was out and out wrong. And so on. What reparations do “I” owe?

I guess I’m saying that I prefer to see myself as part of the solution, not part of the problem. Publicly funded reparations would fundamentally state that I’m part of the problem.

Now, I also agree with some members of the black community that many of the social programs have been more destructive than helpful. By creating a system where the prevailing attitude among some whites is “you can’t make it without us”, the problems have accelerated, not resolved. Now, what a better system might look like is beyond me. The answer, I believe, is not so much about spending more money or creating new incentives, but it actually figuring out how to deal with these issues one person at a time. To do that requires a lot of work, a lot of brick walls, and a lot of heartache. And a lot of willingness by those on the receiving end to set aside THEIR grievances and attitudes.

— hs
8:32 am April 16th, 2009

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Show All