Columnists talk about the court and race
George Will and David Broder weigh in on two Supreme Court decisions this term regarding discrimination.
One is the New Haven firefighters’ case. I am torn on this decision. Although I want to live in a world where race is not a consideration, the evidence in my daily life is that some people still discriminate on the basis of race. I also know that the effects of past discrimination last for generations.
On the other hand, I know that discrimination against white people causes resentment that creates other problems. And it is difficult to defend discrimination.
Will writes: “The nation shall slog on, litigating through a fog of euphemisms and blurry categories (e.g., “race-conscious” actions that somehow are not racial discrimination because they ‘remedy’ discrimination that no one has intended). This is the predictable price of failing to simply insist that government cannot take cognizance of race.”



Jean is projects editor at the Post-Dispatch. She is a member of Bridges Across Racial Polarization, a group devoted to creating friendships and fostering communication among racial and cultural groups in the community. After growing up in a small town in Kansas, she lived in Kansas City and Wilmington, Del., before moving to St. Louis in 2004. She and her husband, Dan Wiggs, live in University City.
While both those gentlemen are fine writers, I think both of them kind of miss the point. I think there is still a place for affirmative action (AA), but this ruling was NOT about AA. It was about whether you can exclude a supposedly fair test (I’ll get to that in a minute) and punish those who passed it because no blacks did (I’d say monirities but two Hispanics passed). Which, by the way, when did Hispanics not count as a minority group?
As to the test, the ruling is a good thing because now the test MUST be certifed by New Haven, which means it can be examined by scholars and groups and whoever else to see if there were any unfair, biased, or otherwise improper parts to that test. This review of the test can only be a good thing in my mind, because it will give proper review to the quality of it. If there was something wrong with it, that should come out.
But AA is still needed. The failure of these black firefighters is an opportunity to review all sorts of training and educational things within their department to discover a reason why this may have happened. Even if no black firefighters are promoted it can still be a beneficial and worthwhile test for the future. New Haven has a chance to make sure that all of it’s emergency personnel are getting the adequate career training needed to climb the ladder (pun intended).
If you take those two columns and mash them together, I think you will find something more realistic…