Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
06.23.2008 4:12 pm

Best of times, worst of times

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

Staring at years of gaping budget shortfalls unless it finds more money, Metro later this year will start painting a picture of two very different public transportation futures.

One of the scenarios - expected to be the focal point of public hearings in September - would include sustaining transit service and the kinds of enhancements that would be possible with new revenue. The other would be a substantially diminished version of what you see today on the roads and light-rail tracks.

“We will be looking for your advice, your direction in terms of how you take the revenues that we do have, if we are not able to get new revenue, and effectively serve the Missouri population,” Todd Plesko, Metro’s chief of planning and new systems development, said during a public hearing on proposed fare increases at St. Louis City Hall.

The most likely permanent new source of financial stability is a half-cent transit sales tax that’s expected to be placed on the November ballot. Half of the proceeds from that tax would go to transit operations and the other half would be growing the MetroLink system in St. Louis County.

But Metro is prohibited from politicking in favor of the tax. At least one Metro critic said  the transit agency’s best-case, worst-case scenarios may come close to the line.

“It is a scare tactic,” said Tom Sullivan, the Metro critic. “The name of the game is create a doomsday scenario. That is what they are doing right now.”

Metro spokeswoman Adella Jones said that’s not the case. The law requires Metro to hold public hearings that accurately show what service adjustments will look like - good and bad. 

Some circumstances were out of Metro’s control, she said. St. Louis County originally targeted February for the tax measure but County Executive Charlie A. Dooley pushed to have it removed from the ballot after the agency lost its high-profile lawsuit against MetroLink contractors.

“We can not advocate for a tax,” Jones said. “You hear it’s a fear tactic. It is not a fear tactic.”

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
5 comments

Comments are closed.

I wish Metro would hire Tom Sullivan. I’ll bet we would have the most efficient, cracker-jack transit system in the country if they did. Seriously, after riding the Metro in Washington, D.C. for a week for my exclusive transportation needs I’ve seen what it can be like to have viable light rail and it’s fantastic. The attitude towards mass transit in this town seems to be the same as that of the St.Louis public schools. Everybody sees a need for massive improvement but there is no leadership to see it through. I’m talking about our town’s movers and shakers who need to get behind these institutions and push for change. It seems all they can think about is selling their corporatiions to foriegners and moving out of here.

— willys
8:46 pm June 24th, 2008

It may be “doomsday”, but it is reality. It takes either substantial state funding (which won’t happen here) or a dedicated local tax source to have a viable system (http://tdp.portauthority.org/paac/portals/1/pdfs/PeerReview.pdf): “The largest source of operating funds for most . . . systems is local or state funds. Only NFTA in Buffalo receives roughly equal portions of operating funds from local and state sources. Transit operations in St. Louis, Denver, Portland, and Seattle receive large contributions from local sources; in every case local funding is raised through local taxes such as retail sales taxes and payroll taxes.”

Metro’s ¼% sales tax is puny compared to the full 1% collected in Denver or Dallas or Houston. The city is already committed to collecting a ½% tax, but, fairly, only if and when the county does the same thing. For better or worse, a November election will set a very clear course for Metro’s future.

— ExRTD
8:00 am June 25th, 2008

It is ironic that we are helping people sandbag due to the flooding and we are having a similar situation with our state of transit here in Missouri. Both Metro and MODOT will be running out of funding (the floods = no money = broken bridges…list goes on). SOMEONE has to pay for it. We are the ones who will have to pay for it. Such is life (no such thing as a free lunch). Perhaps a novel idea is having both MODOT and Metro work together on transportation projects…but like kids in a sandbox…they just can\’t get along. We have to pay for the mistakes of our ancestors investment in \”cheap oil\” infrastructure. Not everyone can afford a personal car (nor should they have to). Give people better transit, walking, biking and they will definitely ditch the car even more..

YMMV

— Jazzy Jeff
11:04 am June 25th, 2008

St. Louis is a frustrating town.

— Anybody
9:45 am June 26th, 2008

Once upon a time the St Louis Region was a leader in transportation. Once upon a time St Louis had leaders who affected National events. Five bridges cross the Missouri River at St Charles and only one has a walking/bicycle pathway. None was built with light rail in mind. The train bridge was built at a time when people road trains. St Louis no longer has a need for rail traffic. Does St Louis still need Metro?

— Laynester
11:21 am June 26th, 2008