Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.15.2008 8:14 pm

Memo to La Russa: Stop Izzy’s Bleeding

  • Email this
  • Print this

With another game on the line, Jason Isringhuasen walked to the mound on Thursday afternoon to absorb another battering at the hands of an aggressive, opportunistic opponent. By the time Cardinals manager Tony La Russa interceded to stop the fight, the Pirates had smacked Izzy around for four runs, including a 3-run homer by Jason Bay. And the Cardinals’ 5-4 lead (and a series win over the improved Bucs) all but exploded at La Russa’s feet. The Pirates soon would finish off an 11-5 victory, and took two of three from the Cardinals.

Frankly, I was shocked to see TLR turn to Izzy for this assignment… and this isn’t a second-guess; I said it was a mistake even before Izzy threw his first pitch. Wasn’t the plan to keep Izzy away from the flames for a while?

It was the Cardinals’ seventh loss in the last nine games, and three of the defeats went in the books as a blown save by Isringhausen.

There were other factors, of course. 

In the seven losses Cardinals’ hitters — continuing the pattern of failing to finish off an opponent – left 60 runners on base and had only 10 hits in 60-bats with runners in scoring position (.167 average).

But during this distressing period, Izzy’s decline and destruction has formed the most glaring fault line in the Cardinals’ structure. Since April 12, he’s blown six saves. He’s been ripped for 19 hits and 16 earned runs in 12 innings. That’s an ERA of 12.00, and the batting average against him during that period is .352. He’s also walked 8, with only 5 Ks.

 But we should no longer put the responsbility, or the blame, on Isringhausen.

This is all on La Russa now.  

Inexplicably, and going against all logic, La Russa seems to be placing his loyalty in one player, Isringhausen, ahead of the greater good of the team. La Russa leads with his heart. He has won a lot of games, hundreds of them, by sticking with pressure-tested veterans through their hard times, their troubles. (We’ve seen him do this before; Mark McGwire in 2001 comes to mind). And La Russa has reasons for his deep supply of faith in Izzy, who has come through like a champ in so many big games. I can understand why La Russa wants to give Izzy extra chances. You don’t casually cast aside a guy who has locked away so many money games for the Cardinals since signing here as a free agent in 2002.

But we’ve moved beyond that now. We’ve gone past the point of giving a key veteran some mistake space, some benefit of the doubt for old times’ sake. What we’re seeing now is a descent into madness.

And this brings to mind a quote attributed to Ben Franklin (not Ryan Franklin) who is credited for this piece of philosophy: “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.”

No, I don’t think La Russa is literally insane. I have too much respect for him to casually throw around such caustic terms. I am citing Franklin’s quote simply as a way to frame the current dynamic with Tony and Izzy. And by repeatedly turning to Isringhausen, by continuing to walk into the same pit of quicksand even though he knows it’s there, La Russa is letting himself down, his other 24 players down. And he’s also letting Isringhausen down, by constantly exposing a vulnerable, possibly spent, reliever to these assaults — when, on most days, Izzy is incapable of fighting back.

La Russa doesn’t want to give away the Cardinals’ surprisingly good start, does he? Why fritter away such a promising beginning to the season by staying with a losing formula? Blown saves are inevitable; the best ninth-inning closers in the  biz hand games away. It’s their occupational hazard. But Izzy is no longer mentioned in the same paragraph as the elite closers, and this is no example of the isolated blown save.  

This cruel sequence of giveaways has a chilling, demoralizing impact on a younger team that’s trying to establish credibility, confidence, and an identity. It’s a team that’s trying to keep pace with the Cubs, who have spent $500 million in players the last two years. And this is no slump that will just go away; this is the rapid decline of a proud competitor. This is an unmerciful beating. This is a crisis. And no one seems to have any firm, clear answers as to what’s wrong with Isringhausen. It could be as simple as an older pitcher going to the mound with eroding, vanishing skill.

This much we know: the man’s confidence is shot. And instead of backing Izzy off, and keeping him out of stressful situations for a while — as La Russa vowed to do after Izzy’s implosion at Milwaukee on May 9 — the manager instead went right back to the damaged closer in a game-deciding situation in less than a week’s time.

And the results were, yes, predictable.

La Russa finally seemed to be squaring up to the stark truth after Thursday’s gut punch by the Pirates.

“Right now it’s problem No. 1,” La Russa said of Izzy.

So where do the Cardinals go now?

If La Russa isn’t serious (finally) about pulling the wolves off Isringhausen, then it’s up to GM John Mozeliak to intervene.

Mozeliak has the authority to set the 25-man roster.

And Izzy should not be on it right now.

Unless Isringhausen decides to retire, there are only two options:

1. Put Izzy on the disabled list and shut him down. Take it out of La Russa’s hands. This is the likely outcome; Isringhausen will visit the doctor on Friday, and I suspect they’ll find something that necessitates a visit to the DL. The Cardinals and Isringhausen have stubbornly resisted any notion that Izzy is hurting even though those around the club hear constant murmurs about the closer’s arthritic hip. Now it appears that they’ll finally deal with the situation. ‘Bout time.

2. If Izzy doesn’t go on the DL — which would be followed by a rehab stint in the minors, where he can legitimately attempt to gather himself without pressure — then the alternative is to designate him for minor-league assignment. Which would likely lead to his release after waivers expire.

The Cardinals don’t want to do that. Not yet, anyway.

But it’s folly to stay the present course.

That course also includes having to work around a 39-year-old reliever, Russ Springer, who must be handled with care.  Springer threw 15 pitches Tuesday and only 2 on Wednesday (a light load for sure) but wasn’t available Thursday. (The rookie Mike Parisi wasn’t available either; La Russa said Parisi might have to take Kyle Lohse’s next start.)  Obviously, this team needs another young arm or two in the bullpen to rejuvenate this bullpen and provide innings. You just can’t have a bullpen that’s this fragile. Time to freshen it up.

And this team has legit options in the minors.

The Cardinals have three terrific young relievers at Triple A Memphis with live arms and low ERAs. We’re talking about Chris Perez, Jason Motte, and Kelvin Jimenez.

Perez, their future closer, is throwing consistently in the mid-90s, and hitting 98 on the gun. We spoke to Memphis manager Chris Maloney on our Team 1380 radio show Thursday, and he said Perez has made improvement in the area that he most needed to address: commanding the strike zone, and reducing his wildness. Through Wednesday, Perez had 8 saves, a 2.04 ERA, and 22 Ks in 17.2 IP. Maloney believes Perez is ready for the majors. “He has electric stuff,” Maloney said. Motte throws just as hard but has no experience as a closer,  and still needs to work on pounding hitters low in the strike zone. But he’s been fantastic, with a 1.47 ERA, a 1.04 WHIP, and 27 Ks in 18 IP as the set-up man. Jimenez doesn’t throw as hard, and doesn’t have the strikeout punch, but he’s pitched very well (1.45 ERA) and received valuable big-league experience with the Cardinals last season.

Perez makes the most sense. He figures to be the Cardinals’ closer in 2009, and it’s vital to prep him with meaningful major-league experience in 2008. He doesn’t have to be the closer now, but can work his way up to that role.

Besides, if Perez gets the call-up to STL, it means the Cardinals can take a look at Motte as a closer at Triple A. That’s a smart idea, because Motte eventually could emerge as the most attractive candidate to close games.

The Cardinals have done a very nice job of building up their farm system. And they should take advantage of their fine work by tapping into that system to alleviate problems at the big-league level. Isn’t that what the minors are for? And in 2009, this team will need some of their best young minor-league prospects to do an effective job in St. Louis.

Isringhausen was a lost soul after Thursday’s game. He doesn’t know what’s happening, or why. He’s lost his moorings.  And his touch. For now, he’s a thoroughly beaten competitor. This isn’t his fault. His bosses are responsible now.

Please stop this fight, please stop the bleeding.   

The other 24 Cardinals deserve to be given their best chance to win.

-B

24 comments

Comments are closed.

To ryderfan1:

“Bernie, I was really saddened to see the “this is on Tony now” line in your article today. Rather than sounding like a professional journalist with inside the organization connections, you have now lowered yourself to the mantra of the anonymous Internet forum posters, who are happy to blast anyone and everyone they deem unworthy.”

I agree with you on this.

“LaRussa’s a smart guy. He didn’t get to be where he is in managing history by being stupid. You know he was most likely hesitant to throw Izzy in that situation, but he’s on the team, he had thrown well in his last outing, and there comes some point where you gotta test the waters. And with several relievers not available, unfortunately the time was then.”

With the close relationship Tony and Izzy have, I doubt he was forced to pitch. I think it does a disservice to both of them to portray Izzy as a victim of Tony’s abuse. The only abuse I can see is the abuse to Izzy’s hip joint. The ball and socket joint has to have a cushion of cartilage to stabilize the joint. With two surgeries to repair tears in the cartilage, it isn’t realistic to think he will come back as he once was. In Joe Strauss’ column, he says sources in the clubhouse say Izzy has been getting treatment for it. I don’t think it is being kind to Izzy to say all he needs is rest, time off, work on his mechanics, and he will come back fine, or to say he is going on the DL list because of a hand injury. In the first place, he couldn’t have pitched if his hand was injured that badly, and secondly,Tony wouldn’t have put him in the game with his hand injured. This would be misleading the fans who love the Cardinals.

“Sure, we can second guess it, criticize the move. However, when I saw that “it’s on Tony” line in your column, it seemed unabashedly to be catering to the Tony haters in the forum. I’m sure they are all virtually high-fiving each other today after reading that. Anonymously, of course.”

This isn’t meant to be against or for Tony or Izzy. I like them both. I appreciate both of their contributions to the Cardinals. I just want the Cardinals organization to be honest with the fans and not whitewash what the problem is.

— LoveTheCardinals
3:49 pm May 16th, 2008

Wait a minute… so I’m “lowering” myself to the level of some wacko talk-show host or Internet board kook by stating the obvious? Which is: TLR is responsible for choosing pitchers to use in a game, and if he continues to use a guy who no longer can get the job done, then the responsibility for the failure is “on” the manager.

Just the way it would be on the manager, any manager, for continuing to use a leadoff hitter who can’t get on base, or a manager who would, for whatever reason continue to have a slow team try to steal bases even if they’re caught stealing most of the time.

In the matter of Izzy … who exactly would be responsible for repeating a pattern of failure in the in-game strategy decisions — Fredbird?

What a bizarre and preposterous observation.

-B

— Bernie Miklasz
4:52 pm May 16th, 2008

Dear Bernie,
You are right that Tony decides on the line-up and chooses the pitchers. I’m sure there are others who share in the decisions, such as Dave Duncan and the coaches. As the manager, he has to shoulder all the blame when things aren’t going well. I certainly don’t defend Tony in this decision in any way. Sometimes he drives me crazy with the decisions he makes in a game. Izzy is a strong personality as evidenced by breaking his wrist slamming a trash can in the past and cutting his hand on a a TV the other night after a blown save. I can’t picture him as a poor mistreated and abused victim of Tony’s or that he just accepts everything Tony says without some input. He is a 35 year old responsible adult. Tony has shown him a lot of loyalty and made excuses for him which has even led some to believe he has been too favored. While Tony is to blame for this disaster, Izzy has to accept some responsibility for allowing this problem he has to linger on and on and not step up and say he needs some help. He shouldn’t have been in the bullpen where he could be used. I think he and Tony know that now. This excessive, over the top sympathy portraying Izzy as a helpless victim is a bit much. I mean you no disrespect, but the strong criticism of Tony and not addressing that Izzy has some responsibility for what he is able to do, seemed just a little over the top. I have read some criticisms about players in the comments of posters that sound similar in tone, but have been explicitly embellished, which I am sure you would never do. Perhaps it has been really dificult for Tony and Izzy to finally make this decision. I can’t believe that Tony would intentionally abuse Izzy.

There is no joy in watching a player on the team you support have failures, whether you are a manager or a fan.

— LoveTheCardinals
8:33 pm May 16th, 2008

Great post. I don’t fault Izzy at all for the last 4 losses he’s been involved in and put all the blame squarely on Tony’s shoulders.

It’s like he’s been in a different zone lately managing games. Besides his dispatching Izzy when he shouldn’t he’s blown it with the last starts of Lohse and Pineiro. Both have struggle lately but in both’s last start Tony had a chance to get them wins as they were leading after the 5 or 6 inning. Instead of putting in the best bullpen in the game Tony sent both back to the mound allowed them to lose those leads before calling in the help.

Perhaps we put the wrong Cardinal on the DL

— Stang52
5:40 pm May 18th, 2008

Pages: « 1 2 [3] Show All