Haslett and the Rooney Rule
Rams fans were buzzing Saturday with the news that the NFL has voided the deal between the team and head coach Jim Haslett.
In agreeing to take over for the fired Scott Linehan, Haslett asked for a contract clause that would ensure his return in 2009 as long as the Rams went 6-6 in his 12 games in charge.
According to Pete Prisco of CBSsports.com the NFL notified the Rams that the Haslett clause is a violation of the Rooney Rule.
This means the Rams can make Haslett their head coach in 2009, but only after complying with the Rooney Rule by interviewing a minority candidate for the position.
The Rams can still hire Haslett, but must wait until the offseason to do so.
This scenario reveals a serious flaw in the Rooney Rule. Haslett is 2-0 as the head coach, and if he continues to win, obviously the Rams would want him to continue on in 2009 and beyond.
And so what would be the purpose of forcing the Rams to conduct a bogus interview with a minority candidate? And how many minority candidates would want to waste their time to meet with the Rams to discuss a job opening that really isn’t a job opening?
It’s ludicrous.
And in theory, the Rams could lose Haslett because of this. Suppose he shocks the NFL and leads the Rams to a winning record and a playoff spot? I don’t think that’s going to happen, but if the Rams continue rolling, Haslett’s stock would rise. He’d be very much in play. And other teams would likely want to talk to him about becoming coach. But because the NFL forbids Haslett from signing with the Rams during the season, the chances of him slipping away and taking another head-coaching gig will only increase. (That said, Haslett has told me several times that his family loves it here and he’s excited about staying. He doesn’t want to move. So in this scenario, he’d probably ride it out and give the Rams a chance to make a deal before talking to other teams.)
This also raises the issue of double standards. The Colts (Jim Caldwell) and Seahawks (Jim Mora Jr.) already have appointed successors to take over once Tony Dungy retires in Indy, and Mike Holmgren retires in Seattle. So why can’t the Rams promote Haslett from within?
According to one of my sources in the NFL office, those situations are different because Caldwell and Mora reached agreements while their team’s head coaches were still on the job. In other words, the job never became open – and St. Louis was different because the job technically became open the moment Linehan was fired.
This logic seems nonsensical to me.
But policy is policy, and the Rams won’t be able to run the old end around play to get past the rule.
One more thing about this:
The prospect of losing Haslett to another franchise aside, It’s probably OK for the Rams to wait a while, anyway. Two games is too soon to conclude that Haslett is the HC for 2009. Let’s see how this plays out. Rams chairman Chip Rosenbloom tells me that he’s very pleased with the way the Rams have responded to Haslett, and he hopes it continues. Not that the Rams could discuss a contract with Haslett now – the Rooney Rule prevents that – but it’s wise to hold off a bit.
Suppose the Rams start losing and playing poorly? Wouldn’t the franchise want to open up a legit coaching search? Of course. And though the Rams are not being shopped for a sale right now, if the right person emerges, things could change quickly. And a new owner might have his/her own ideas about who should be coaching the team.
Thanks for reading…
-B


The Rooney Rule proves itself to yet again be nothing more than public relations window dressing. Personally, I do not want Haslett to stick around and hope the Rams look for a different coach. That said, why shouldn’t they be able to promote from within? Just so another minority gets an interview with owners that have no intention of hiring him anyway? What a waste of everybody’s time.
I also think the Rooney Rule seems to have created a safety net for minority coaches already in the league. When you think about it, there are at least 3 coaches in the league right now that should have been blown out long ago: Herm Edwards, Romeo Crennel, and Marvin Lewis. And I can make a legitimate case for Lovie Smith and Tony Dungy as well. The first three are just remarkably inept at game planning, adapting to personnel, managing the game itself, and building teams with character. Smith ought to be glad he plays in a putrid division and that his D somehow scores a TD each week to carry the offense. And Dungy, he got the job based on being a defensive mastermind, yet the defense is consistently the weak link to the team. Yet these coaches seem to get a pass from the media and their owners. I truly believe there is a fear to criticize minority coaches because of the defense the NFL seems to give them.
The Rooney Rule needs to go. Let the owners who spend millions upon millions of dollars to purchase and run their teams, hire the coach they feel gives them the best chance for success. It has nothing to do with race. It has to do with dollars and cents.