Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
10.19.2008 11:31 am

The Mizzou Massacre

  • Email this
  • Print this

The most shocking aspect of Missouri’s humiliating 56-31 loss at Texas wasn’t the final score.

It was Mizzou’s softness.

This team was not ready to play. The Tigers played scared. I know Texas has more talent, more depth, and the physical toughness to dominante on both lines. That’s certainly the No. 1 reason why the Longhorns made brisket out of the Tigers.

But how do we explain Mizzou’s incredible stage fright in a big game?  the Tigers have been playing the big rooms for a while now. They’ve had plenty of games on ESPN and ABC. They’ve been on the cover of Sports Illustrated, ESPN the Magazine and other national publications. They had a showdown game with Kansas last season, and played Oklahoma twice, including a matchup in the Big 12 Championship. And they’ve played Illinois twice in St. Louis, and that’s a rivalry game with a lot of built-in pressure.

Those games should have prepped the Tigers and conditioned them for the meeting in Texas. At the very least, I expected Mizzou to put up a fight and generally play well and come up short.  And while losing should never be acceptable, it is possible to lose in a way that maintains respect.

Mizzou lost a ton of respect and credibility on Saturday night. The MU offense, predictably overrun by the Texas front, was shaken and rattled. And QB Chase Daniel lost his poise (again).  The Tigers opened the game with three-and-outs on three of the first four possessions. And forget this bunk about Daniel playing in the NFL; if the dude encounters even a faint pass rush it unhinges him. Getting smacked around is standard in the NFL.

On defense, the Tigers offered little resistance and the Longhorns bullied them for first-half TD drives of 94, 82, 43, 41 and 92 yards. Look, the Longhorns are a powerful force on offense, but Mizzou made it to easy for them.

Given that the Tigers had a solid defense in 2007, and were returning nine or 10 starters for 2008, how can this unit be so feckless? What happened here? How did these players forget how to play pass defense in less than a year’s time? How and when did they lose their competitive fire? When did the turn so soft? And why can’t defensive coordinator Matt Eberflus get a response from the players, or adjust his schemes to close the glaring holes in the Mizzou secondary? Why are his blitzes so predictable? Texas knew when the blitzes were coming and Colt McCoy carved it up.

And the questionable coaching isn’t limited to the defensive side.  Just how many times did Gary Pinkel and offensive coordinator Dave Christensen need to see redshirt freshman Elvis Fisher get buried at left tackle at Texas before they’d conclude it might be smart to give the young man some help? And why did it take the MU coaches six quarters (four vs. Oklahoma State and then the first half vs. Texas) before they closed those wide O-line gaps that made it so easy for the Cowboys and Longhorns to stuff the run or crash Daniel’s pocket?

Pinkel, Christensen and Eberflus did a terrible job of preparing their team for the last two games, and even a worse job of adjusting. And there’s really no excuse for that. Again, if Mizzou loses because of the talent deficit, that’s one thing. But it was more than that. the timid Tigers got jacked in Austin because they weren’t locked in, competitively. And once Texas began rolling, the MU coaches did nothing to slow the avalanche. Mizzou was in a daze, players and coaches.

This team wasn’t ready for a big game.

The coaches weren’t, either.

And Pinkel still hasn’t beaten Texas or Oklahoma.

Reality check?

MU is at best the sixth-best team in the BIg 12. Texas, Oklahoma, Texas Tech and Oklahoma State are clearly superior. And objectively, you’d have to put Kansas ahead of Missouri at least until the Tigers and Jayhawks meet and settle their annual feud later in the season. At least Kansas went into Oklahoma yesterday and competed like crazy, putting up a fight and getting a lot of things done on offense until the Sooners pulled away late. At least KU didn’t go into Norman and lay down, the way the Tigers did in the first half at Austin. I hate to say this, but what happened Saturday night reminded me of the Woody Widenhofer years, the Bob Stull years.

(Some of you have since written in to say that the above Stull-Woody reference is a cheap shot … you’re probably right.  But I was really frustrated watching that game, because, despite what some of you believe, I want the Tigers to win. I’m not saying that this Mizzou team is as bad as those sad-sack outfits, but Saturday night brought back some unpleasant flashbacks. That’s all).

This was one of the most disappointing efforts I’ve ever seen from a team that was supposed to be great, supposed to be a contender for a national title. Instead, we’ve discovered an unfortunate truth: Missouri is not ready for the big time. At least not yet.

-B

36 comments

Comments are closed.

I agree completely. It reminded me of when I was in college. Embarrassing. No excuse for their lackluster effort. It is time for Eberflus to hit the road. He obviously has no clue how to coach a defense. The offense was not prepared either. At least they finally got on track. But too little too late. They could never have come back with this defense. Hey defense, yes you are terrrible. You are not better than your rating. You are worse.

— ankiel24fan
12:43 pm October 19th, 2008

Thanks, Bernie. It might be worth noting that performances like last night, combined with inept coaching, have likely damaged future recruiting efforts. Hence, I believe the team is now destined for decline. Anyway, over and done with this crew. Who really cares what they do now. Oh, how in the world did they maintain a 16th position in the new polls. I would dump them completely out of the top 25.

— thamnosma
2:06 pm October 19th, 2008

i agree 100% with everything you said there bernie..the worse defensive performance i’ve ever seen on a football field..it was really really sad..that first play, a reverse that didn’t trick anybody, started the game off..timid… afraid..i thought pinkiel was ready to take this team to the next level this year, i thought wrong …

something has to be done about that defense..whether it’s a new defensive scheme , coordinator or something

— sadsushi
2:27 pm October 19th, 2008

I agree. Fire Pinkel. Dismantle the program and sell the football field. Tell the Golden Girls to turn in thier uniforms. How could Mizzou ever compete with the likes of Texas Tech, OSU, and Kansas. Those teams are clearly superior. OSU blew us out by an outlandish five points. The last time we played them in Stillwater we beat them. And Texas Tech ran us off the field last year…oh wait…we routed them by 31 points not one year ago and beat them by 10 the year before. And that objectively superior team Kansas was owned by MU last year and lost to MU by 25 in 2006. Believe me, MU has no reason to take anything for granted. At the same time, you need to get hold of yourself Whitlock…I mean Bernie. Its a vastly improved program from only three years ago. They have recruited well and MU has much to be proud of which is more than you can say about this article. It will take time, if it can be done, to build up the talent pool that both OU and Texas have. That said, Pinkel has given an honest and productive effort so far. I don’t know what you think you recall from the Widenhofer or Stull years, but MU has lost exactly one home game in two years. Go sleep off your hangover and try again tomorrow.

— Mizzou Gets it
2:46 pm October 19th, 2008

Wow Bernie, way to pile on like you always do. Mizzou hung around pretty well in Norman last year too. Comparing this team to Widenhofer and Stull teams is just irresponsible. I suppose now that the Rams have won two in a row you will compare them with Giants and Titans….

— Charlies_dad
3:26 pm October 19th, 2008

The Evil Pinkel has re-emerged. After all the press about how he’s changed since early in his tenure at Mizzou and how that corresponded with his success, it’s incredible that he’s returned to his “roots.” Apparently he can’t help himself.

— wfseube
3:32 pm October 19th, 2008

This is sad. We had high expectations this year because of the finish last year. But we forgot two things - teams would learn to defend against Daniel and the spread and Mizzou is still losing too many recruiting battles. Some teams - Texas, Oklahoma for example - are still faster, bigger and stronger than Mizzou. Mack Brown didn’t have the same talent at NC and Tulane as he’s been able to get at UT. Pinkel has made steady improvements and should be given more time.

Let’s remember that if Mizzou finishes in the Top 20, that is still much better than in many past years and is still good. But to get up to No. 1, we’ll have do better recruiting lineman and defensive talent. 2 and 3 star talent doesn’t match up to the 4 and 4 star players.

— gjhuff
4:02 pm October 19th, 2008

Dismantle the program… huh?

Ladies and gents: I know the Mizzou program is in much better shape than it used to be. THAT IS NOT THE POINT, so don’t change the bloomin’ topic, OK? The subject is: SATURDAY IN AUSTIN. Nothing else. And they went to Austin and played an inept and embarrassing football game. I see no reason to sugar-coat it. If you want to treat this program like it’s a charity, be my guest. I refuse to do it. I’d rather show respect to the program by treating MU as if it is one of the big boys, rather than a charity.

And yes, that was what I used to see from a Stull team, a Widenhofer team. They were run off the field by a great team. That’s the way it used to be for this program. I thought those days were over. Not quite.

Mizzou can still rebound to play for the Big 12 North title. But I see no reason to suddenly lower the standards and treat this program as if it’s a poor little underdog. The Tigers were ranked No. 1 last season. They were No. 2 in one poll this season. The standards are higher now. It’s a part of success. Sorry. You want big-time college football? Or do you want this program treated like it’s the little engine that could? Please. Raise your standards.

Thanks.

-B

— Bernie Miklasz
4:03 pm October 19th, 2008

Pinkel has a plus—recruiting. He’s done a fine job. But he has never had a decent defense and his offense can’t play with the truly great teams at all. His x’s and o’s look gteat against average competition, but fail the test against good teams. He has always been a timid play caller in big games, and transmits his lack of guts to the team with his miserable calls. How does an offensive line feel when you kick a field goal on the 1/2 yard line on 4th down? He might as well have told them in person they suck and he has zero confidence in them. His teams are always SOFT against tough, physical teams. In short, although he has turned the program around, he is not even close to the top level teams in the Big 12.
There is a lot of work to be done and it starts with recruiting some real defensive players. I doubt Pinkel will ever rise above where he is now, but I will be rooting for him.
CBA

— Coach Big Al
4:39 pm October 19th, 2008

So it’s about Saturday ONLY, yet the names Widenhofer and Stull appear. Which is it? I’ve never known anyone to be so angry at the world. Go write some more about how great Floyd Irons is and how much good he does. I’m sure he’d love some visitors in the federal pen and would welcome an interview.

Try, just once, to write something positive. Ever. In your entire life. Please? I was mad after watching Mizzou, but at least I kept some sort of sense of reality. We all saw it. We all saw them lose. We we all frustrated. But to write the garbage you continue to put out there… makes me think you must have a union-protected position. (and we all know you do).

You’re just so upset all the time! It’s almost funny - and it’s almost like you just try to irritate people with your overreactions to just about everything. All major local franchises could win it all, Mizzou could win titles in several sports, and your article would be about how pathetic it is that SLU can’t win. That’s how angry and sad you seem to be. Someone loves ya, big guy. Smile.

And also, stop sitting online all day reading the comments about your article. It’s sad. Yet I’ve got two bits that says you’ll respond again later… sigh…poor guy.

— Stahlhut
5:07 pm October 19th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 » Show All