Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
11.26.2008 1:58 am

St. Louis Blues: Some Love for Andy Murray

  • Email this
  • Print this

The new season wasn’t more than two, three weeks old before some fans began yelping for the dismissal of Blues coach Andy Murray.

There’s a long sheet of schedule ahead of the Blues, and I’m not bashful about getting on coaches and managers, but I can’t imagine why anyone would rip Murray right now.

Murray’s forward lines have been shredded by injuries, but his players continue to battle like crazy.

Tuesday night in Nashville,  the Blues gutted out a 1-0 shootout win over the old tormentors, the Predators. Goaltender Chris Mason was ridiculously good for the third consecutive appearance. He stopped 47 shots in three periods + overtime, then smothered two more in the shootout. In his last three games (two starts), Mason has allowed two goals on 102 shots to raise his season save percentage to .927.  Mason struggled after being sidelined for surgery to remove his appendix, but he’s clearly sharpened into form. It’s been years since the Blues received this kind of stellar play from their No. 2 goalie.

Since Friday, the Blues have defeated Anaheim, Minnesota and Nashville in tough, grinding, low-scoring contests.

Tuesday night, Murray didn’t have these forwards available because of injury:

Andy McDonald

Paul Kariya

Patrik Berglund

T.J. Oshie

Dan Hinote

Also, The Note was down another regular because of the deal that sent Lee Stempniak to Toronto.  The two players obtained by the Blues — center Alex Steen and defenseman Carlo Colaiacovo — are on the way, but weren’t in Tuesday’s lineup.

To fill the voids, Murray plugged in the Peoria platoon … guys who are stepping in, and stepping up, with so many regulars on IR.

Cam Paddock played 11 minutes over 16 shifts.

Chris Porter played 10 minutes over 14 shifts.

Steve Regier played 15 minutes over 19 shifts.

Brad Winchester played 14 minutes over 20 shifts.

B.J. Crombeen played 12 minutes over 16 shifts.

Young veteran Yan Stastny continued to see increased ice time, with 15 minutes over 22 shifts.

Those are the forwards.  We should also mention semi-regular defenseman Jeff Woywitka, who logged 21:45 of ice time in this one.  That’s the most Woywitka has played in a game since joining the Blues in 2005.

And somehow (Mason being the No. 1 reason) the Blues defeated the Predators. The Blues were outplayed, no question. As they should have been, given the talent deficit. Nashville was the superior team and Mason prevented the predictable outcome. But the Blues won on the road in what has been a brutally tough building for them. And the Blues never stopped competing. The fierce OT penalty kill by Jay McKee, Eric Brewer and Jay McClement was inspirational.

Murray is getting the boys to play like maniacs.  He’s taking a terribly thin roster and stretching out, making excellent use of his personnel by going with short, high-energy shifts. The coach clearly has asked more of his players during this time of adversity, and they’ve responded to him. That’s quality leadership.

My point is this: if we’re going to dog Murray for his flaws (real and perceived), then it’s only fair to give the coach a bunch of credit when the Blues overachieve.

And while a 9-8-2 record on the season is no cause for a parade on Clark Avenue, it’s more than satisfactory for a team that’s been ravaged by injuries. Given the circumstances, it’s highly commendable.

One more thing before I close …

I’m scratching my head at some of the criticism of the Stempniak deal.

I understand the risk involved, and I pointed that out in Tuesday’s column.

I also understand that Colaiacovo comes here with some baggage; in Toronto he was at times portrayed as a head case, and someone who didn’t always work to get into the best possible shape. But he also has skill. We’ll see what he does with this fresh start. He’s a fairly mobile defenseman who can move the puck, and that attribute fills a true need.

(BTW … in Toronto, at least one prominent hockey columnist reacted to the trade by blasting the Maple Leafs).

Here’s what I don’t understand: when, exactly, did Stempniak become Mike Bossy, Jarri Kurri … or even Dino Ciccarelli? I must have missed that, so please fill me in.

I know Stempniak had 27 goals two seasons ago, and sure, he could find that touch again. But in his last 97 games as a Blue, STempniak scored 16 goals despite being given the team’s third-highest total of ice time on the power play.

Critics of this trade give the thumbs down because they believe the Blues have exchanged a sniper (Stempniak) for a grinder (Steen).

I guess I’m a little perplexed by that interpretation for several reasons:

* In 233 NHL games, Stempniak has 57 goals.

In 253 games, Steen has 50 goals.

Or, if you want to break it down this way, Stempniak scores 0.24 goals per game … and Steen scores 0.20 goals per game. Am I missing something? Where’s the big difference?

* Stempniak and Steen broke into the NHL the same season, 2005-2006.  Up until the time of the trade, Stempniak had logged about 230 minutes more than Steen on the power play.  And despite the huge gap in ice time given to each player on the power play, they had the same number of PP goals, 16.  Hmmm…

* Steen is also more versatile. Stempniak wasn’t used much as a penalty killer; as a Blue he had about 85 minutes, total, with the team playing shorthanded. As a Maple Leaf,  Steen logged 659 minutes as a penalty killer.

* This season Steen had two goals for the Leafs compared to Stempniak’s three goals for the Blues. And Steen was a checking-line center who ranked No. 2 on Toronto on penaty-kill minutes.  This season Steen’s role was dramatically different than the one Stempniak enjoyed in St. Louis; unlike Stempniak, Steen wasn’t given much of an opportunity to skate on an offensive-oriented line.  And he had one fewer goal than Stempniak. Big deal.

* Steen had more goals than Stempniak last season, 15-13.

* Steen has also won 52. 4 percent of  his faceoffs this season, and that’s a plus for the Blues, who don’t have McDonald, their best faceoff man (at 61.4 percent). With McDonald on the shelf for a long time with a broken leg, the Blues needed to reinforce the center position. Steen should be a legit workhorse, asked to contribute heavily at both ends of the ice.

Again, I like Stempniak. But I just didn’t see Mike Gartner out there, as others apparently did.

Thanks for reading, and indulging…

-B

15 comments

Comments are closed.

B Some fans just aren’t happy unless they are complaining. We CLEARLY fleeced Toronto here. We got Steen who basically as you pointed out is the same player as Stempniak right now, and a chance for him to be better than him. And we got and extra player who fills a pretty big need, plus save some cash for next year. The kind of a deal is a GM’s wet dream!!!

— rpwest22
7:19 am November 26th, 2008

I don’t think we fleeced Toronto, but we didn’t get fleeced, either. There is definitely potential for us to turn it into a fleecing, though. If these 2 can live up to 70% of the hype that followed their drafting, we could walk away with far more points and goals than Stempy could ever provide.

— Cryptic79
8:22 am November 26th, 2008

Good column.
With some of the critics of this trade, you would have thought we just moved Doug Gilmour, Stevens, Shanny, Hull, Cujo, Brind’Amour, or someone of that caliber.
Stempy scored 27 goals 2 years ago, he hasnt lived up to his big contract that he signed. He underachieved last year with 13 goals, and doesnt look to be scoring 30 goals anytime soon. Maybe he will, and good for him if he does.
He scored a game winning goal the other night, and JD capitalized on that.
Some Blues fans have a hard time understanding that this is a business and the goal is to win the Stanley Cup. We sometimes get attached to players, and get all upset for management getting rid of them. The thing is as a Blues fan, we get attached to individual players easily. Since St. Louis has never won the Stanley Cup I think fans get caught up in the individual player, and lose focus on what the importance is. The overall goal is to win the Cup. The team is the importance, not the individual.

— gooth4
9:01 am November 26th, 2008

Thanks for the rational, empirical analysis.
I wasn’t excited about the deal until reading this article.

I was and am willing to wait and see, but I wait no longer to give the deal a thumbs-up!

— briandunne
9:08 am November 26th, 2008

This deal works out thusly…Toronto traded two underachievers to STL for one underachiever. The Blues got one extra underachiever. The deal makes sense for both teams. This life long Blues fan likes the deal for all the reasons already stated. Stempniak had turned into Jim Campbell (soupy).

— cncdaddy
9:33 am November 26th, 2008

B thanks for giving Murray some credit. As a longtime fan and 2nd year season ticket holder I couldn’t be more excited about the future of the Blues. And as a true hockey fan that follows the entire league, I really don’t believe the majority of fans actually realize what we have in JD. This guy is a hockey man all the way. Last year I predicted the cup will be in STL within 5 years. Well, we have 4 more to go. We will be back in the playoffs next season. And as far as the best move the blues have made this season, I would trust JD and the blues scouts with my first born son! And finally, I have a question…has the Blues recent points streak corolated with a decrease in icetime for Brewer? I have a feeling it does. I don’t know what kind of leader he is in the dressing room but I do know he is the worse player on the Blues on and away from the puck.

— bluesfan79
9:45 am November 26th, 2008

Murray only seems to shine with this type of lineup. When the skilled players were out there, not so much. Criticism deserved.

Blues gave up on Stempniak too early, plain and simple. He’s only 25. When you lack facts, always jump to the extreme conclusion that he’s the next Gartner, Bossy, Ciccarelli or Kurri. That’s a dead giveaway that your argument lacks credibility. I like Colaiacovo but Steen is just a guy. I love your assessment of his versatility - like you’ve tuned in to see him play all the time…….

He’s a younger version of Jamal Mayers. Blues have too many of those type of clowns already. Don’t need another.

Bad trade.

— bigbri
9:57 am November 26th, 2008

It’s so true that some fans aren’t happy unless they’re complaining! This article expresses exactly what I’ve been thinking for the last few days since the trade! I don’t think everyone really realizes what we have here in STL. Andy and JD are going to make this the best team they can…and this trade will hopefully come to show that. All I keep thinking is 2 for 1! How is that a bad deal?? Especially after reading this article, there’s no doubt in my mind this will end up being something good for the Blues. BluesFan79 hits it right on the head! GO BLUES! (Get rid of BREWER next!!)

— apestl
11:48 am November 26th, 2008

LOL, bigbri …

I “lack facts,” eh?

I guess you missed my thorough accounting of each player’s goal-scoring history, and the amount of power play time they’ve received.

But your deep analysis begins and ends with “He’s a younger Jamal Mayers.”

That’s hysterical. A good way for me to start the day here on the web site. Thanks for the smile, and I hope you and your family have a Happy Thanksgiving.

-B

— Bernie Miklasz
12:44 pm November 26th, 2008

Translation: “You’re right bigbri. I’ve never seen Steen play a single game. I can only spout stats. And I couldn’t pronounce Colaiacovo correctly without a tutor but I know my hockey doggoneit.” -B

Stick to a sport you actually watch more than on the nights when nothing else is on that interests you. You don’t pay enough attention to hockey to know any of these guys and it shows.

And you and yours have a Happy Thanksgiving as well.

— bigbri
1:16 pm November 26th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All