Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
12.31.2008 9:26 pm

5 Minutes For Blogging, Jan. 1 (updated)

  • Email this
  • Print this

Happy New Year!

1. ENOUGH ALREADY WITH BASHING ST. LOUIS AS A FOOTBALL TOWN: Did you see that Arizona and Minnesota are struggling to fill the stadium for home playoff games this weekend? What a joke. The Cardinals have never hosted a playoff game in Arizona, and this is the first (home) NFL playoff game for the franchise since 1947. And the Vikings haven’t had a home game in the playoffs since 2000. And yet, as of Wednesday afternoon 6,500 tickets were available in Arizona, and 11,000 were unsold in Minnesota. And people rip St. Louis for being lukewarm about pro football? That’s absurd. This town has stuck by a lot of losing teams, and the Rams drew good crowds over the last two seasons despite a 5-27 record. But whenever there’s a few thousand empty seats in St. Louis during terrible times, the short-attention span crowd begins caterwauling that the Rams are being abandoned, and that it’s inevitable the franchise will move to Los Angeles.  Well, I guarantee you that if the Rams had a home playoff game this weekend the Edward Jones Dome would be completely filled. Vikes RB Adrian Peterson is worth the price of admission, no? Maybe the Vikings ought to consider moving to LA.  And if the Rams had Pro Bowl QB Kurt Warner throwing passes to Larry Fitzgerald and Anquan Boldin, you wouldn’t be able to get a ticket to Rams home game… let alone a Rams home playoff game. Rams fans have nothing to apologize for. This may not be Green Bay or Pittsburgh, but the support for pro football has held up just fine. (Yeah, but if management screws up the coaching search, that could change in 2009).

2. LOSING AARON MILES IS BESIDE THE POINT: OK, so Lil’ Scrappy signed a 2-year deal with the Cubs for $4.9 million. He was a good Cardinal. He did a nice job. But there’s already so much whining from Cardinals fans, you’d think that Miles was Frankie Frisch, or something. Please. We’re talking about a player who has a career OBP of .329, and he doesn’t hit for power. And Miles is an OK second baseman, but you don’t want to use him very often at shortstop or third base. Miles getting nearly $2.5 million a year from the Cubs, and that’s funny.  But here’s the real deal: you should be upset that the Cardinals haven’t lined up someone better than Miles to fill his role, especially since they let Felipe Lopez walk, too. Subtracting Miles doesn’t represent a significant loss. It would be worth nothing more than a shrug if the Cardinals went out and upgraded the infield bench. But the Cardinals’ bench is weaker because of a passive management approach, at least so far. So far this offseason they lost Miles and Lopez and both players were positive contributors offensively last season. (Even with Miles and Lopez the Cardinals were 9th in the NL in OPS among second basemen, at .754. How bad will that be in 2009 if they can’t plug in the offense provided by Miles and Lopez? This means that the second baseman (without a safety net) is Adam Kennedy — the same guy that the manager benched last year, the same guy that the Cardinals tried and failed to trade after he requested a way out. Wow. Again: let Miles walk to be overpaid by the Cubs, and I don’t care. If Lopez goes, fine. But I do protest if you do nothing in response except try to plug in one of Jeff Luhnow’s precious (and overrated) Faberge Egg infield prospects as a Miles-Lopez replacement and try to tell the fans that you’re just as good if not better.

3. BY THE WAY, YOU DO REALIZE THAT BILL DEWITT IS BECOMING JERRY JONES, RIGHT? Go ahead and rip Cardinals GM John Mozeliak if you’d like. But if you really believe that Mozeliak has autonomy on payroll spending and major baseball decisions, then I have one of those old Busch Stadium urinals to sell you for about $3,500. (Let me clarify since this confused some folks: Jones owns the Dallas Cowboys and serves as his team’s de facto GM. DeWitt owns the Cardinals and is very involved in the baseball decisions, and it is my belief that he’s evolving into the team’s de facto GM.)

4. NON-SPORTS NOTE OF THE DAY, ON FOOD: One of my favorite subjects, obviously. And the best dish I’ve had at a St. Louis restaurant over the last three months are the braised short ribs at Herbie’s Vintage ‘72 in the CWE. It’s perfectly tender, and the bleu cheese mashed potatoes are an ideal complement. Try this and you will thank me later.

5. MIKE ANDERSON OR RICK MAJERUS, LET THE DEBATE BEGIN: Anderson is in his third season at Mizzou; Majerus is in his second season at St. Louis U.  While acknowledging that Anderson has a head start on Majerus because of the extra year, I submit this two-part question: (A) which coach will be first to build a consistent presence in the NCAA men’s basketball tournament? (B) And if the answer is “neither,” then which coach will go away first — either through a firing or resignation?

Keep the answers clean, and civil. Thanks.

-Bernie

50 comments

Comments are closed.

Neither Majerus nor Anderson will make their teams a regular contender for the NCAA. I would expect, given his history, that Majerus will step down after this year or next.

— itchie
7:38 am January 1st, 2009

Bernie: U r starting to sound more and more like Peter King. I am counting the minutes till I start hearing abouat “coffee nerdness”.

— superdog
8:16 am January 1st, 2009

Bernie, I disagree with your assessment of Miles. Miles has given the Cardinals much more than you are willing to give credit for. I’m not sure Miles is a 162 game, day in day out player, but off the bench and a safe fill in at positions other than Second, he is a valuable chip to have.

Your comment on Jeff Luhnow’s “precious and overrated)Faberage Egg” prospects sounds petty and self serving. No doubt some of these guys will not make it big but several are recognize by some outside St. Louis as very good prospects. The farm system that contains these players is recognized as a top ten Minor League organization. Perhaps you might want to offer an explaination for such a snide remark on a guy that has done much to turn around this part of the Cardinal organization and why you consider Cardinal prospects to deserve such a depreciating remark.

I enjoy and appreciate most of what you write but sometimes you seem to go over the line somewhat and sound more like some of the more radical posters than a professional columnist. To me, this is one of those times.

— kenw
8:50 am January 1st, 2009

Ram-Man,

Several problems in your argument - first, saying that St. Louis football fans didn’t have to go through misery of watching their team fail is about as ridiculous as you can get considering we watched the Cardinals battle to be the worst NFL team for years with little or no success. Perhaps no fans in the NFL have had to suffer through crappy football over a long period of time than STL fans have.

And citing attendance in cities like Detroit, Kansas City and Buffalo to point out the inadequacies of Rams fans is just inaccurate. The Rams were 25th in the league in attendance this season at 92% capacity for the year. Below them were the Bills at 89% (Buffalo is consistently at the bottom of the pack in attendance) and Detroit who was dead last at 83%. The Chiefs were two slots ahead of us with 93% and if you talk to anyone who has season tickets in KC, they’ll tell you that the last several games at Arrowhead were about 15-20k short of capacity.

This may be primarily a baseball town, but to suggest that we don’t support the football team - especially considering that with the exception of a three year span they’ve been horrible for the better part of the last 50 years - is just wrong.

— jbacott
9:25 am January 1st, 2009

Bernie, I have disagreed vigorously and often with you in the past but the new year brings some changes. On #’s 1, 2 & 3 you are dead on in your assessment. On #4 I will yield to your obvious expertise and try the place. On #5, I am afraid it is neither and Anderson will be out the door first - one way or the other.

— cardsramsloyal1
9:50 am January 1st, 2009

I think Bernie’s analysis of the football markets is dead on. St. Louis HAS supported the Rams and will continue to do so as long as the team is trying to do the right thing. Bill Bidwill can crow all he wants but it was when he stopped caring about things here that the fan support vanished and he had his reason for moving the team to Arizona. Things haven’t been so great there since he left have they?

Living in Denver now, I see just the opposite as this is a football town. Broncos football rules the roost and the Colorado Rockies……..are just a summer amusement. Of course the ROX payroll is about half of the Cardinals’ so you can imagine what’s said out here about the Momfort brothers!

— aztec
9:55 am January 1st, 2009

Please, folks, consider using a spell checker. Reading some of this stuff is aggravating.

— bjdeeler
10:02 am January 1st, 2009

Bernie,
I am surprised that you made such a big mistake in regards to the football Cardinals playoff record. They have, in fact, been to the playoffs since 1947. They made the playoffs in 1998 with Jake Plumber as quaterback. They drew the Cowboys in the first round and surprisingly beat them. They then faced the Vikings in the second round and lost.

— JRein40806
10:11 am January 1st, 2009

The Dolphins are having a heck of a time selling out their game on Sunday as well. I get so tired of people saying our fans won’t support the Rams and using Detroit, Kansas City, Cincy, etc… as examples to support that argument. Ram-Man, you say the Lions “packed a stadium” for an 0-15 team? They blacked out several games and the ones they didn’t were half full. And I love Isaac Bruce as much as the next guy but he couldn’t be further off with his assessment of the situation in Kansas City. I have relatives there and that stadium was barely half-full for 6 of their 8 games. The Chiefs bought tickets and gave them away. Read the KC Star to confirm that. Isaac (and most people in St. Louis) say that the Chiefs fans support their team regardless but actually, the Rams had better attendance than the Chiefs. “Attendance” and “Tickets sold” are two entirely different things. I hear my family express their apathy for the Chiefs on a daily basis. I’m impressed with the support the Rams have and wish the rest of the people here were educated about what’s really going on across the state, and across the NFL for that matter. 2009 will be exciting for the Rams or at the very least, interesting.

— lufc1991
10:30 am January 1st, 2009

I cleaned up the result of my bad and hasty typing and inserted “home” game relative to Arizona’s playoff history. Thanks.

B

— Bernie Miklasz
10:33 am January 1st, 2009

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 » Show All