Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
12.31.2008 9:26 pm

5 Minutes For Blogging, Jan. 1 (updated)

  • Email this
  • Print this

Happy New Year!

1. ENOUGH ALREADY WITH BASHING ST. LOUIS AS A FOOTBALL TOWN: Did you see that Arizona and Minnesota are struggling to fill the stadium for home playoff games this weekend? What a joke. The Cardinals have never hosted a playoff game in Arizona, and this is the first (home) NFL playoff game for the franchise since 1947. And the Vikings haven’t had a home game in the playoffs since 2000. And yet, as of Wednesday afternoon 6,500 tickets were available in Arizona, and 11,000 were unsold in Minnesota. And people rip St. Louis for being lukewarm about pro football? That’s absurd. This town has stuck by a lot of losing teams, and the Rams drew good crowds over the last two seasons despite a 5-27 record. But whenever there’s a few thousand empty seats in St. Louis during terrible times, the short-attention span crowd begins caterwauling that the Rams are being abandoned, and that it’s inevitable the franchise will move to Los Angeles.  Well, I guarantee you that if the Rams had a home playoff game this weekend the Edward Jones Dome would be completely filled. Vikes RB Adrian Peterson is worth the price of admission, no? Maybe the Vikings ought to consider moving to LA.  And if the Rams had Pro Bowl QB Kurt Warner throwing passes to Larry Fitzgerald and Anquan Boldin, you wouldn’t be able to get a ticket to Rams home game… let alone a Rams home playoff game. Rams fans have nothing to apologize for. This may not be Green Bay or Pittsburgh, but the support for pro football has held up just fine. (Yeah, but if management screws up the coaching search, that could change in 2009).

2. LOSING AARON MILES IS BESIDE THE POINT: OK, so Lil’ Scrappy signed a 2-year deal with the Cubs for $4.9 million. He was a good Cardinal. He did a nice job. But there’s already so much whining from Cardinals fans, you’d think that Miles was Frankie Frisch, or something. Please. We’re talking about a player who has a career OBP of .329, and he doesn’t hit for power. And Miles is an OK second baseman, but you don’t want to use him very often at shortstop or third base. Miles getting nearly $2.5 million a year from the Cubs, and that’s funny.  But here’s the real deal: you should be upset that the Cardinals haven’t lined up someone better than Miles to fill his role, especially since they let Felipe Lopez walk, too. Subtracting Miles doesn’t represent a significant loss. It would be worth nothing more than a shrug if the Cardinals went out and upgraded the infield bench. But the Cardinals’ bench is weaker because of a passive management approach, at least so far. So far this offseason they lost Miles and Lopez and both players were positive contributors offensively last season. (Even with Miles and Lopez the Cardinals were 9th in the NL in OPS among second basemen, at .754. How bad will that be in 2009 if they can’t plug in the offense provided by Miles and Lopez? This means that the second baseman (without a safety net) is Adam Kennedy — the same guy that the manager benched last year, the same guy that the Cardinals tried and failed to trade after he requested a way out. Wow. Again: let Miles walk to be overpaid by the Cubs, and I don’t care. If Lopez goes, fine. But I do protest if you do nothing in response except try to plug in one of Jeff Luhnow’s precious (and overrated) Faberge Egg infield prospects as a Miles-Lopez replacement and try to tell the fans that you’re just as good if not better.

3. BY THE WAY, YOU DO REALIZE THAT BILL DEWITT IS BECOMING JERRY JONES, RIGHT? Go ahead and rip Cardinals GM John Mozeliak if you’d like. But if you really believe that Mozeliak has autonomy on payroll spending and major baseball decisions, then I have one of those old Busch Stadium urinals to sell you for about $3,500. (Let me clarify since this confused some folks: Jones owns the Dallas Cowboys and serves as his team’s de facto GM. DeWitt owns the Cardinals and is very involved in the baseball decisions, and it is my belief that he’s evolving into the team’s de facto GM.)

4. NON-SPORTS NOTE OF THE DAY, ON FOOD: One of my favorite subjects, obviously. And the best dish I’ve had at a St. Louis restaurant over the last three months are the braised short ribs at Herbie’s Vintage ‘72 in the CWE. It’s perfectly tender, and the bleu cheese mashed potatoes are an ideal complement. Try this and you will thank me later.

5. MIKE ANDERSON OR RICK MAJERUS, LET THE DEBATE BEGIN: Anderson is in his third season at Mizzou; Majerus is in his second season at St. Louis U.  While acknowledging that Anderson has a head start on Majerus because of the extra year, I submit this two-part question: (A) which coach will be first to build a consistent presence in the NCAA men’s basketball tournament? (B) And if the answer is “neither,” then which coach will go away first — either through a firing or resignation?

Keep the answers clean, and civil. Thanks.

-Bernie

50 comments

Comments are closed.

RamsHeadedBackToSoCal:

Just move here to watch the Rammies. The Rams are such a natural fit for STL because of the times in the 70s and 80s, we rooted for them in the playoffs against the enemies of the gridbirds.

They were our favorite team in-season and post season.

STL is the Rams’ home now. They will forever be the STL Rams going forward. STL is loyal to a fault to its sports’ franchises. Just look at the Cardinals’ management now and see the blistering discussions if ownership is really committed to fielding a World Series contender.

No one can tell me that Chip Rosenbloom and the Rams have been lazy this season about finding a way to win in the future. It’s not winning that counts in STL; it’s about seeing a true commitment to winning.

The Rams have already demonstrated that since week 4. And now, after week 15.

The Rams are STL’s team, and no other city’s now. And, we’re jealous of them, even though we watched or listened to each and every game this season like I did.

…and could not wait to hear the post-game shows, and daily shows and interviews, and blogs about the Rammies.

STL cannot get enough of Rams football because you see it here in these blogs and hear it on the Sports shows.

STL is passionate about its sports. We won’t give them free passes when they suck; but when they show us they try, we will go down on the ship with them.

STL is a great sports city. The Rams stay here. And the NFL front office knows that.

And so does Chip and Lucia. Making the Rams a winner in STL will make them the money they need to take care of business. ‘Cuz it ain’t gonna happen any other way.

LA Jaguars is what you should be counting on, if anything.

LA Texans just doesn’t seem quite right.

— paperlion
3:09 am January 2nd, 2009

Bernie, I remember strong support for the poor mid-’90s Rams teams during one of my visits to StL, and crazy support for them once they got hot and made their two super bowl runs. There was no questioning StL as a football town then; ANY market (except maybe Green Bay with it’s tiny stadium and exceptional tradition) that experiences the kind of down-turn Rams fans have endured in the last few consecutive seasons will experience declining attendance - even the Cowboys did a few years back. Add on top of that the nasty front office politics, inexplicable release of fan favorite Isaac Bruce, a terrible economy, lack-luster presentation at the Dome (so I hear and read), and some extreme give-up games by the Rams this year - what else could you expect?
One more thing - Your comment about Bill DeWitt becoming Jerry Jones is a HUGE stretch (and I’m not talking about Jerry’s face-lift). Ok I’ll buy that he’s very involved in baseball decisions, and even entertain your opinion that he’s becoming “de facto GM”. But saying DeWitt is like Jerry Jones is equivalent to saying Torry Holt is becoming Terrell Owens just because he’s occasionally vocal about how bad things are getting in this franchise. Jones is a successful businessman, and he’s been very successful in marketing the Cowboys franchise and increasing its value. He caught lightning in a bottle with Jimmy Johnson and the Triplets in the early 90s (much like the Rams did later), but what has he done since? He has made the Cowboys both the envy and the laughingstock of league at times. I shudder at the thought of anything close to Jerry Jones destroying the proud Cardinals franchise. If he owned the Cardinals, we’d have Barry Bonds, Manny Ramirez, Alex Rodriguez, John Rocker (I know he’s gone, but I’m rolling here) with embarrassing scandals, no Tony La Russa, and no success.

— STLinDAL
7:54 am January 2nd, 2009

Great comments by paperlion - interesting to hear the SoCal perspective on the Rams. It’s hard to believe LA still doesn’t have an NFL franchise, but I agree the Rams aren’t going back there. Somebody will eventually, the Jag’s are probably as good a guess as any.
Regarding StL’s long-lost Gridbirds, I would love to see them go deep in the playoffs and have success, especially with Warner at the helm. I don’t think it’s gonna happen, but despite my dislike for Bidwell, I still have a spot in my heart for the football Cardinals. As long as they Rams have more success (not necessarily in the same year), I hope the Gridbirds get theirs too.

— STLinDAL
8:05 am January 2nd, 2009

Listen STL, like it or not, there wouldn’t even be a blog entry about the passion of your football fans if it weren’t an issue to begin with! I doubt Green Bay sports writers use blog space to defend fan passion week in and week out. I have never seen a city so worried about patting itself on the back for its enlightened way of showing support for the local football “product”…because you know rabid die-hard fans always refer to their beloved team as a product, LOL! Rabid, die-hard, fans that bleed blue & gold shouldn’t use business theories of supply and demand and terminololy associated with business (such as product) to defend their lack of support. I will not argue with the logic of the argument, but to use it and then claim unwaivering support through thick and thin really rings hollow. “Win and we will come, lose and we stay at home” is the motto of a fair-weather fan base! Its the question of conditional vs. unconditional love and the problem is STL wants to believe they are the unconditional Green Bay type of football fan, yet they behave and even defend the conditional love that LA Rams fans once exhibited. I have no problem with that, but don’t pretend you are better than west coast Rams fans. Remember we had them for about 40 years, yet are judged only on the final years before the move! How many of you in STL would support the Rams if they do come home as we in CA have supported them while they are in STL? If you say you would not, then how could you compare your loyalty to ours? We love you STL, and we love the memories, but we want our team back!

— RamsHeadedBackToSoCal
9:32 am January 2nd, 2009

As a card fan for almost fifty years, it pains me to see such passivity from the front office. Mo led off this hot stove season by saying the team would be aggressive. Right. It seems his greatest talent this year is describing how the cards barely lost out on this one or that. But most disappointing is that I don’t see this management making the effort to build a winner before Albert’s free agency. The clock is ticking. They need to realize that because they see the market one way does not make it reality. You have to pay premium dollars for premium players. With the attitude they are displaying I bet it’s been years since they bought a car. I know you have to build the farm system, but not at the expense of the big club. By the way, is Al Baker’s still in Clayton? In the seventies that was a fantastic restaurant. Served a filet mignon that would melt in your mouth. Now I’m hungry.

— roger from lake tahoe
10:33 am January 2nd, 2009

Point #1 is right on. Put a team in L.A. and let’s see just how many people show up when your team wins 5 games in 2 years, your draft picks are horrible and don’t even start for the team and your coaches don’t seem to get along with each other. Let’s see how many people in beautiful L.A. in the winter time find something better to do than attend a football game where the outcome is pretty much decided before the first snap.
Point #2 is also accurate. Yes, probably paying Miles 2.5 is extreme, however, what happens if Kennedy starts out slow or for that matter gets hurt. No more Miles (.317 avg.) or Lopez to pickup the slack. Guess who? Brendan Ryan. God, did I really just say that!! That kid is awful. Mediocre bat, no power and plays poor defense and still has mental lapses on the field.
Point #3. I realized this many years ago.

— phillymick
10:42 am January 2nd, 2009

#2 The Miles move allowed the Cubs to trade DeRosa for three prospects {Miles will still make less than DeRosa the next two years} who the cubs plan to send to San Diego for Jake Peavey. Sounds like good sense to me.

— luckybuff
11:35 am January 2nd, 2009

I’d say neither on the college basketball question and I’d guess Anderson would get fired first. He should, he’s at a Big 12 school and Majerus is in that Atlantic whatever crap. Neither really inherited players that fit their system.
Mizzou isn’t a disaster so I think Anderson deserves his fourth and maybe fifth year, but time is a tickin’.

I agree on Dewitt. I felt that from the second he hired Mozeliak over more qualified candidates.
Not a good sign.
I’m really getting tired of the nickel and dime approach w/ no inclination to fill holes. You know, Albert isn’t going to be around forever.

— aulslmo
11:44 am January 2nd, 2009

As a transplanted St. Louisan now living in LA, I find some of your comments interesting, if nothing else. Too bad you don’t have many of your facts straight.

First of all, you posted a link http://www.losangelesfootballstadium and mentioned a new stadium is in the works. If “in the works” means drawing some architectural pictures on a piece of paper, then it’s in the works. But the developer of this stadium still needs to find a partner to fund it since no public money would be earmarked for the project. Last I heard, he’s still looking and not one shovel has gone in the ground. For those who want to see the LA Coliseum renovated, they would have to do it to the tune of $800 million dollars and no group has thrown their hat into the ring to get that one done. And with the state being $13 Billion in debt, I don’t foresee any public funds helping this movement. So where’s the progress you speak of?

And your comments about St. Louis having a fair weather fan base are pretty laughable. Aside from maybe the Lakers, LA is the most fair-weathered, front running sports city I’ve ever seen. What are the LA sporting events that you say are consistently packed? Until the Dodgers got Manny, I saw a lot of empty seats at Dodger Stadium. Been to a Kings game lately? How about the Clippers? LA is no different than any other city. If your team stinks, people won’t go. And that’s especially true of the LA market because there are so many OTHER entertainment choices. And there is nothing wrong with that. And before I forget… where is this large “underground” Ram fan base out here that is “drooling” for the Rams to come back? I don’t see anyone rooting for the Rams out here. There is no media coverage of the Rams. There is no Rams “buzz”. They aren’t even a blip. I do, however, see the Chargers covered fairly extensively in this market. I think you’re overstating the interest and progress that is actually being made to bring pro football back to LA. And until LA gets their act in gear, the only pro football you’re going to be able to see for the next few years is USC football. And if you’re a UCLA fan, I can’t help you.

— Left Coast Birdo
12:48 pm January 2nd, 2009

Left Coast Birdo, if you read carefully I have never said some SoCal fans aren’t fair-weather band wagon fans. I said that STL fans aren’t any better despite their firm belief to the contrary. In your listing of teams that aren’t selling out locally you conveniently left out some of the teams that do; Angels, Chargers, Ducks, and as you mentioned USC, Lakers, and Dodgers. Given the amount of local entertainment options, I would have to say that anyway you cut it the SoCal sports market is better than people give it credit for. Also, like yourself many in this area are transplants from other areas with other sport loyalties too!

As for the http://www.losangelesfootballstadium.com reference, the developer owns the land, and is going through the steps towards developement (a lot of red tape to cut through in SoCal) but as I understand it is going along well. You are correct that there isn’t any shovel work, but first thing is first. I know I wouldn’t build a stadium until I was pretty sure I had a team lined up and awaiting a move in date! FYI, the LA Coliseum is already out of contention.

As for your not hearing about the underground following in the media, I think thats why I referred to it as underground. Remember however that money speaks louder than words and since 1995 all the Rams pre-season games were televised in the LA market. Now why is that? This year the NFL would not allow the Rams to negotiate a TV deal with the LA market for pre-season, but every year before that they did. Now why would TV stations pay to televise all STL. Rams pre-season games for over a decade in an LA market where fan support for the Rams is supposedly non-existant?

Also,there are SoCal groups that gather to view regular season Rams games at bars too (a rather large one in Pomona if I remember right). And in case you didn’t notice there are fans from CA that come to this web site for their Rams fix. So I don’t know what you need to see as proof of an underground following, but how about this, I drove to Phoenix for a Rams/ Cardinals game a few years back and over half the stadium was Rams fans! Oh, and guess what plates were on the vast majority of Ram fan cars in the parking lot…California!

— RamsHeadedBackToSoCal
10:31 am January 3rd, 2009

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] Show All