Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
10.18.2009 5:27 pm

Oct. 18: Spags Had to Go For It

  • Email this
  • Print this

My Stream of Consciousness flow on the Rams’ 23-20 OT loss @ Jacksonville.

* Make it 0-6 on the season and 0-16 since Oct. 19, 2008. Monday is the 1-year anniversary of the Rams’ last regular-season win. And now Indianapolis and Peyton Manning come to STL on Sunday. The Rams are 5-33 since the end of the 2006 season. This, presumably, is some sort of karmic payback for the Miracle of 1999.

* This is a bottom-line business. It isn’t high school. In the NFL they don’t hand out trophies and ribbons for trying hard. And 0-6 is really bad. And 16 consecutive losses is unacceptable. But I respected the Rams’ effort and determination and several aspects of their performance at Jaxville. There have been many times since the start of the 2007 season when I’ve wanted to stop watching the game, because the Rams have been so weak in terms of competitive character. I’ve seen too many Rams games where the players don’t care, and these no-shows are disgusting. Watching Sunday’s game, I saw a group of players who were doing everything and anything they could to win a game. And I respect that. I think the Rams are getting better. I know that isn’t enough, and that it doesn’t count; there are no moral victories. But if nothing else I at least want to come away from a game with a some respect for the players and their desire to win. And that happened Sunday. A team that’s been ravaged by injuries fought like mad to win a game. I appreciate that part of it.    

* Coach Steve Spagnuolo had to go for the win at the end of the 4th quarter. His offense had battled and scrambled and survived its way down the field and had a chance to win in regulation. The Rams defense — on the field for a remarkable 51 snaps during the second half — was gassed. You just knew if it went to OT and the Jaguars got the ball first, the Rams defense would be too worn down to make a stop. So you had to go for the win, go for the throat, right then and there. Seven seconds left, at the Jax 9, and one timeout left. You have to take a quick shot into the end zone. If it fails, and the ball is thrown out of the end zone or is incomplete, you don’t need the timeout. You kick it on the final play. Or if you make a play that’s short of the end zone, then you call the timeout and kick it. And if you turn the ball over or take a sack,  so be it — at least you went down taking your best shot, and most people would respect the attitude. I would not criticize Spagnuolo for being aggressive there, even if hs decision blew up on him. You have to go hard there, let it roll. You were 0-5, and the organization had lost 15 in a row, and there’s no reason in the world to be safe and conservative. 

OK, even if you disagree — and as a guy who tries to be fair I recognize that there’s a reasonable case to be made for what Spags did — then answer me this: how you can have a final drive with the game on the line and matriculate from your own 22 down to the other team’s 9-yard line and still exit that possession with one timeout remaining in your pocket? Perhaps with better clock/game management by the coach and QB Marc Bulger the Rams would have had more time to work with there. Even if you agree with Spagnuolo’s decision to boot the field goal, I don’t think there’s much of a defense for running low on time when you still have a timeout at your disposal. The Rams should have been able to run at least an additional play or two along the way.

* QB Marc Bulger was not only fortunate that he didn’t have a pass picked off on the final drive; he wasted precious seconds in the sequence near the end. I can’t be too hard on Bulger; this team is devoid of any kind of difference-making wideouts. He’s trying to win a game with Tim Carter and Keenan Burton and Danny Amendola as his receivers.  And if Jackson is used properly, that onlt helps Bulger or any QB. But not utilizing Jackson only makes the QB’s mission even more diffcult and problematic. Bulger did a nice job of running the West Coast attack in the first half, completing 14 of 17 for 125 yards. Shurmur made good use of his personnel in the first half, but the offense really bogged down in the 2nd half. I have no idea what the strategy or approach was in the second half. I know they are short on quality wideouts, but still. And why not use the fullback more in an effort to be more physical in the run game?

* I do not understand why this offensive coaching staff continues forget about the team’s best player, RB Steven Jackson. It is incomprehensible. The Rams kept SJ39 busy in the first half with 17 touches (12 runs and 5 catches). But in the second half of a very close game, Jackson had only five touches. How can that be? On the Rams’ first play of the second half, Jackson rushed for 15 yards. He had only two three carries after that. They did try to throw the ball to Jackson three times in the second half, but two were incompletions. And that inspiring 38-yard catch and run on the final drive of the fourth quarter was Jackson’s only reception in the 2nd half. I know the Rams didn’t have the ball much in the second half, but maybe they could have moved the chains and extended some drives if they’d gotten Jackson more involved.

Let’s see … you have a stripped-down offense, and you’ve lost your best receiver (Donnie Avery) in the game, and you have a RB who came into the game ranking 4th in the NFL in rushing yards and 4th in yards from scrimmage. And you give him 5 touches in the second half? Unbelievable. Only 5 touches, and one went for 15 yards, and another went for 38. Gee, you think you might want to try and put the ball in his hands and get more of that? If you keep Jackson busy, he has shown the ability to break out some 10+ runs and can be an asset as a receiver. But you can’t take advantage of Jackson’s skills if you don’t put the ball in his hands. I don’t get. It makes no sense. Oh, say you say Jax loaded the box to stop Jackson? Hey, it happens EVERY week and it’s never a reason to stop running the guy. The Rams stacked the box against Maurice Jones-Drew on Sunday and you didn’t see Jacksonville stop giving him the rock. I realize Pat Shurmur is a first-time offensive coordinator, and that he is a work in progress, but this was ridiculous.  And doesn’t the head coach have to intervene there? At some point, doesn’t Spagnuolo have to go over to Shurmur and say, “Look, pal: we need to get No. 39 the ball.”

* By contrast, the Jaguars knew what to do with their star RB, Maurice Jones-Drew. In the first half, the Rams stuffed Jones-Drew who had 11 yards on 8 carries. Did the Jags forget about him or surrender on the run? Of course not. They pounded the Rams with him as the game went on;  Jones-Drew had 25 carries for 122 yards and two TDs in the second half and OT. I hope Shurmur and Spagnuolo were taking notes. You want to win a game? Try utilizing your best player to make plays.

* Yes, I think coaching was an important factor in why the Rams lost this game; I really do. And game management hasn’t been in play much this season because the Rams have suffered so many blowouts.  I do believe there is a learning curve here for a first-time HC and OC, and it will take time. Hopefully, Spags and his offensive coordinator are learning as they go along. Spagnuolo is doing some good things. His players clearly like and respect him and want to win for him. That’s a start. But now the Rams have to hope that Spags will develop in other areas, especially when he benefits from having more talent on the roster. In many respects it’s an unfair fight for the HC. But like many of his young players, he’ll have to grow in a hurry.

* Defensive end Leonard Little, who was very sick all weekend, played his tail off. Three tackles, a sack, three pass breakups and a 36-yard INT return for a TD. Little hadn’t been a force like that in a game for a long time. When he’s healthy and loose and getting after the QB, it really makes a difference. The Rams got some heat on the QB for a change.

* Though he faded late — again, the Rams defense was fatigued and overrun — rookie MLB James Laurinaitis had five tackles, a pass breakup, and an INT. He was active. The kid is a good player, and he’s still learning on the job. I was resistant to overhyping No. 55, because it wasn’t fair to him, but for all of the same-old, sorry drafts the Rams have had, getting Laurinaitis in the 2nd round is one of the best picks this franchise has had for a long time.

* The Rams can’t catch a break with injuries. WR Donnie Avery caught an early TD pass, then injured a hip and did not return. The Rams cannot keep their receivers healthy. DE James Hall departed the game with a groin injury. On the OT drive, the Rams lost two of their more capable players, CB Ron Bartell and LB Will Witherspoon,  to injuries. You’d think that sooner or later, they’d benefit from some luck. But it doesn’t happen. It’s the fate of a bad team, I guess. When you are 5-33 since the start of the 2007 season, everything snowballs, everything bites you in the neck.

* Can Avery stay healthy in this league? Is he durable enough to withstand the hits and the punishment that’s part of the NFL experience? Fair question. Legitimate question. And so far the answer is “No.” He’s had multiple injuries in less than a season and a half of NFL ball.

* The Rams secondary was terrible for the second consecutive week. The DBs turned an old Torry Holt into a young T. Holt (5 catches, 101 yards). They dropped INTs. They gave up 335 yards passing, They allowed 15 passing first downs and a staggering completion rate of 70 percent. And the QB wasn’t Brett Favre; it was David Garrard. In the last two games the Rams have allowed 48 completions in 67 attempts (71.6%) and an average yards/per attempt of 8.46 to the opposing starting QBs (Favre and Garrard).

* The officiating was incoherent Sunday. They got it wrong on a couple of pass interference calls against the Rams. Even when referee Jeff Triplette had a chance to review an onfield mistake — the sideline catch by Holt — he still got it wrong and didn’t reverse the ruling on the field. NFL officials, for the most part, are frontrunners. (I apologize to the many good officials out there, including my friend Joe Larrew, because I know it isn’t true of all officials.) They know who is good, they know who is bad, and they know who the “name” players are. It may not be something that they’re even aware of outwardly, but it’s always been my belief that the zebras give the benefit of the doubt to good teams and name players. Look, the Rams didn’t lose the game because of the officials. But it’s hard to imagine a more poorly officiated game than the one I saw Sunday.

* After going 73 yards for a TD on their opening drive, the Rams offense didn’t reach the end zone the rest of the day and generated only 189 yards on their final nine possessions. The Rams offense has scored only 5 TDs this season. They do not have a rushing TD. And in the NFL only Cleveland (4) has fewer TDs on offense.  And that won’t cut it.

* New Orleans, by the way, has 22 offensive TDs this season. In terms of style and production, the Saints are the closest thing we’ve seen on offense to the Rams’ “Greatest Show” carnival that rolled up all of those points and yards from 1999 through 2003.  

Thanks for reading …

-B

50 comments

Comments are closed.

I respectfully disagree. Spags did go for the win on the play with 00:15 left. You have to kick with 00:07 left. 00:09 okay, but those seven seconds run quick if Bulger has to scramble.

Good call by Spags, I agree with it completely. And I still support Sudden Death OT, even to the detriment of a worn out defense that played its spirited rear off in the second half.

Those guys were just worn out. And just heard Cliff Saunders complaining about missed tackles and Laurenitis specifically in the Jags’ final drive in regulation.

Misplaced blame, Cliff.

The offense is now officially the only problem inhibiting this team from getting a win. And, I’m thinking the play calling is largely responsible.

I’m not calling for heads on the chopping block. Just asking for learning more lessons from the offensive play execution from the second quarter up until the last Rams drive in regulation. The defensive blitzes have been aggressivelately, perhaps too aggressive at time. Let’s see that on offense more. There’s nothing to lose except another ballgame.

The middle of the field by rule is still available to our receivers in the second and third quarters.

— paperlion
6:01 pm October 18th, 2009

I didn’t get to see the game out here in the Mountains of the Sierra but i will take your words as gospel!!!
What the hell is wrong with the coaching of this team????
I will trade our great high school teams coaching staff with the Rams …Anytime!!!
Wait a minute we have a great team and coaching staff…I take that statement back!!!!!!

— mountain man
6:05 pm October 18th, 2009

I agree; the missed tackles were clearly related to the fact that the Rams defense was on the field for 51 snaps in the 2nd half. Of course they were gonna wear down.

-B

— Bernie Miklasz
6:15 pm October 18th, 2009

I disagree with paperlion and agree with Bernie on this one. 7 seconds is just enough time in that situation. If the QB needs to scramble, he throws an out-outta-here pattern and the clock stops at 0:03 or 0:02. Basically Spags played for a tie on the road, which is usually equivalent to a loss, and it was today. We all knew that the Rams needed to win the OT toss to have a chance, and they lost it, and with it, the game. Bad coaching decision.

I had predicted a Rams victory today, based on [1] playing Jax, not a good team; and [2] an under-rated game from last week, in which we basically outplayed Minnesota except for 5 or 6 incredibly horrible plays. Of course we can’t pick-and-choose which plays to take away, but the Rams shows much improvement in the overall play-by-play-by-play scheme of things. Except for major downers like poor play selection by the OC. Ditto today in the second half.

— NJRamFan
6:15 pm October 18th, 2009

paperlion, I agree completely. The defense played its collective heart out and @$$ off. Once again, I seem to be noticing a theme of throwing on 3rd and very short, like 2 yards. WHY!?

— RedGoblin
6:17 pm October 18th, 2009

23-20 Jacksonville…
The offense scores 13 points? Jackson gets 2-3 yards, I don’t care if he gets 200 yds that way, it is a one man show and is still boring. Take away his one long run per game over his career and that is what you get. I’ll take the Cardiac Cardinals and the Greatest Show on turf. After Coryell left it was dull, boring football. After Martz left it has been dull, boring football. Doesn’t matter if it is 6-0, still BORING!

— ktmitchell
6:18 pm October 18th, 2009

I did not see the whole game because the Chiefs were pulling out a WIN! Outstate here we are blessed getting both franchises on tv. I thought it was going to be a good day for the Rams and Chiefs until with 15 seconds left in regulation, I saw a veteran QB earning double digit millions of dollars lolly gag around behind the line of scrimmage before throwing the ball away leaving 7 seconds on the clock. Spags had to be going nuts. A veteran QB wasting 8 seconds when the play is not there, and he is not a running QB. I understand Spags’ decision not to put the game back into Bulger’s irresponsible hands. I do agree Bernie that I wanted Spags to go one more play for the win, but he apparently didn’t think his receivers could get open, and Bulger would have the poise to save a second or two on the clock. I do prefer the old adage: play for a tie at home; play for the win on the road. The Rams played well the times I was tuned in, except for the 8 seconds wasted by Bulger. That was a tired and beat up defense in OT; still they fought hard and did stop the Jags.

— Rahb
6:19 pm October 18th, 2009

I’m a Coach Martz fan and a Don Coryell fan, but I don’t think they’d be scoring a lot of points with Tim Carter and Keenan Burton and other mystery guests at WR. I’m trying to understand why Steven Jackson gets fingered as the culprit when he’s the only offensive player they have who can make a difference.

— Bernie Miklasz
6:21 pm October 18th, 2009

And I will do a mea culpa. This game was the first one this year where I got into my expletive laden soliloquys toward the TV about the offensive, and some defensive blitzing, play-calling.

I’ve hammered Bernie and the PD staff for getting upset in a rebuilding year. But, now I understand better that they’re still Rams fans that need to vent, get it out of the system, come hell or high water and reader rebukes. Then, breathe and then regroup and look ahead to next week.

Darn, what a frustrating, disappointing game of all this season. I vent.

Go Rams, Go Spags! The team’s record ain’t pretty, but the Rammies are the only kid we got in the NFL. And it’s growing pains time.

How many times does a parent wish their one-year old would celebrate the next birthday as a 50-year-old billionaire!

: )

— paperlion
6:26 pm October 18th, 2009

Whenever you play for a tie, you lose. I’ve seen this happen time and time again. The experts will tell you the same, never play to tie, you play to win. With 9 seconds left and a time out left they should have tried to win it. Another coaching mishap by Spags, same old coaching, same old losing. Like I said before, the Rams need a go-getter coach but they keep getting these weak coaches. Face it St. Louis, the Rams will be losers until they get a new QB, Coach and a running back that can get more than 3 yards a carry. Jackson looks good, talks good but i’m afraid he is a loser unless they can trade him to a good team. Ever since Faulk left Jackson was going to bring the Rams into the playoffs, it will never happen. Bulger is best a second string QB. Spags is not head coach material. It seems the Rams have bad karma on their side, they can’t win no matter how good they play.

— pearl15
6:29 pm October 18th, 2009

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 » Show All