Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
10.31.2007 2:05 pm

Getting to Know Mo

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

DOWNTOWN — When Cardinals manager Tony La Russa was asked about the qualities he saw in John Mozeliak that made him a good general manager candidate, La Russa looked over at the nattily dressed exec, smirked and said:

“Wears nice ties.”

That may be the case — and, with Mozeliak, the man most of us know as “Mo”, haberdashery is a calling card — but the Cardinals new general manager is far more than a suit. He was Walt Jocketty’s top lieutenant for the last five seasons and has been with the Cardinals since the fall of 1995. Including his climb from the lower levels of the Colorado Rockies organization, that is all bio info.

Here’s some other tidbits and links about the man at the helm of the Cardinals, the “Mo” we’ve come to know:

– Is a native of Boulder, Colo., and a graduate of the University of Colorado.

– An anecdote in ESPN senior writer Jerry Crasnick’s article from earlier this season that describes Mozeliak’s role in scouting and acquiring Albert Pujols:

But some scouts considered him too chunky and “heavy legged,” and there were rumblings that he might be older than advertised. He played at Maple Woods Community College in Kansas City, and St. Louis scouting director John Mozeliak, at the urging of scouts Mike Roberts and Dave Karaff, saw him at a college tournament in Wichita and thought he was worth a shot.

The Cards signed Pujols for a reported $60,000 and sent him to the instructional league in Jupiter, Fla. In his first at-bat, Pujols hit a ground ball up the middle. The next time up, he launched a shot off the roof of a building beyond the left field fence.

Farm director Mike Jorgensen nudged Mozeliak in the ribs and asked him, “What do we have here?” As it turns out, only the most prolific hitter of his generation.

–  Some agents have come to prefer dealing with Mozeliak. A season or so ago, an agent attempted to get in touch with the Cardinals several times before breaking protocol and calling Mozeliak directly. Within a day or two, his client had signed with the Cardinals. That player had a role in a league championship team.

– KSDK/Channel 5 has an interview with Mozeliak that is available at iTunes.

– Is actually … John Mozeliak Jr.

– A lengthy interview with Mozeliak conducted back in 2004 by Brian Walton over at The Birdhouse, by way of the StlToday.com Cardinals forum. And keep in mind that there has been subsequent coverage that discussed the constraints the Cardinals had on them in 2004 (no cross-checkers, etc.).

– Went to Fairview High in Boulder, where he was a standout baseball player and later a coach before latching on with the expansion Rockies for their first season.

– From the State College, Pa., paper about how Pittsburgh could follow the Cardinals example when establishing and improving its minor-league team there and its minor-league system overall:

The St. Louis Cardinals, the Spikes’ former parent club, demanded players to make community appearances, wear collar shirts and work longer than eight-hour days. The Cardinals spent last year molding players for runs at National League Central titles.

They sent an armada of executives from St. Louis to State College to ensure young professionals adopt the “Cardinal Way.” Cardinals general manager Walt Jocketty and assistant general manager John Mozeliak spent a series with the team.

– Counts Jerry Walker among his mentors, and when I spoke with Bob Gebhard a few weeks ago, Gebhard said: “Mo is ready for that job. He’s had a good teacher (in Jocketty) and he’ll do well.”  

– Has served in the following roles with the Cardinals: an assistant in scouting operations; assistant scouting director; scouting director; Director of Baseball Operations; director of the draft; before the 2005 season he was shifted from a focus on amateur scouting to professional scouting; continuing work with player development. I found articles that described him as both a “Moneyball”-type executive — in one ranking of prospects that described his role in development — and as a scouting-oriented “baseball man”.

Headed into  Busch Stadium for the press conference. Will revisit if I come across or remember additional  anecdotes or bio bits.  

-30-

9 comments

Comments are closed.

Why the mystery on this anecdote? I’m gonna guess Spezio? Maybe Jeff Weaver?

- Some agents have come to prefer dealing with Mozeliak. A season or so ago, an agent attempted to get in touch with the Cardinals several times before breaking protocol and calling Mozeliak directly. Within a day or two, his client had signed with the Cardinals. That player had a role in a league championship team.

— Fuhrig
3:37 pm October 31st, 2007

Great instant blog, by the way, Derrick.

In his list of past jobs within the team, does Mozeliak’s work in scouting and drafting bear any responsibility for the current plight in the minors as discussed in your Renteria blog?

Interesting point about Mozeliak being portrayed as both a Moneyball guy and an old-fashioned scouting guy. Mo money?

You could have done so much more with “Getting to Know Mo.” Getting to Mo You. Mo’ing Down the Competition. Mo Way Out for DeWitt. Curley Mo and Larry Walker? Cardinals Need Mo. Well, you were in a hurry. I look forward to the press conference reporting.

— Fuhrig
3:46 pm October 31st, 2007

CAN THIS GET ANY WORSE?

This organization is going in the completely wrong direction. The Cardinals do not get the GM they want and so they hire their last choice for the job. This is after they first bring back Tony La Russa, who would rather play broken down veteran players instead of the younger players with more upside. The Cardinals need to look at how Boston and Colorado blended the two together to form competitive teams.

I’m not sure if anyone knew this or not, but the Cardinals were an awful team last year. But, for some strange reason they keep resigning all of the same players off of that team. Does anyone see this team with all of the same players somehow winning an extra 15 games to make the playoffs? I don’t

The only way this situation could get worse is if they resign David Eckstein. He was a good player while in St. Louis, but the Cardinals need to save the 5-8 million a year and put it towards a better use. Brendan Ryan could fill in for league minimum and add some youth and speed to an aging team, but La Russa has already made comments about not wanting to play him. Eckstein is an aging player with very questionable fielding skills and a declining walk rate which affects his ability to reach base. If the Cardinals wouldn’t give Renteria 10 million a year, why give a player not nearly as good 8 million. Offer him arbitration and take the draft picks. If they resign Eckstein it will only lengthen the list of bad signings over the past couple of years.

If the Cardinals ever want to build a minor league system YOU HAVE TO DRAFT THE BEST AVAILABLE PLAYERS. To the cheap owners of the team, this means drafting Rick Porcello (the highest rated high school pitcher in the draft) instead of Pete Kozma.

— Szermaj
5:53 pm October 31st, 2007

Wow, they should have hired you Szermaj.

— Ed
6:40 pm October 31st, 2007

Today’s blog is nothing but a waste of reader time. Goold, you can do better. Shame on you.

— grider
9:01 pm October 31st, 2007

Who’s paying Eckstein $8 million a year? I think he’d like you to be his agent. There’s some truth to what you say about him, but your guesses about his contract are completely incorrect. According to the website below, Eck made $4.5 million last year, up from 3.25 and 2.25 in the previous two years. IF he’s re-signed, it should not and presumably would not be for a raise. I wouldn’t expect hot free-agent bidding for him. Despite hitting over .300 in 2007, he’s had a consistent trend for two years now of the kind of injuries that show a physical decline: back, abs, knees, hammies. Here are some of the people who made as much or more than Eckstein in 2007: Braden Looper and the ever-popular Juan Encarnacion. The ones who really burned me last year were the two signed to rich contracts AFTER major injury issues: Mulder and Edmonds.

Here’s the website I use to check contracts before I shoot my mouth off. It was provided by Goold this blog, and I immediately bookmarked it: http://mlbcontracts.blogspot.com/

— Fuhrig
8:28 am November 1st, 2007

Eckstein will make more that 4.5 mil next year, maybe somewhere between that number and the aforementioned 8 mil. More significantly he is at an age where he will be looking for a multi-year contract, and I just don’t see that as a good investment. Eckstein is a claas act and a great team player, but just not a good enough player to justify shelling out the contract that he wants (and will receive from someone).

— E Mar
10:52 am November 1st, 2007

I was very aware of how much Eckstein made last year, if you check out some of the rumors out there, Eckstein should expect to receive offers around 2-3 years and 5-6 million per year. Even if they can sign him for five million a year (which is not a bad price), I hope they do not lock themselves into a three year commitment with an aging shortstop. The White Sox and the Mets reportedly have interest in him, The Mets might want to move him to 2b.

Let the young guys play and save the money. The FA pool this year is a little shallow, keep the money this year and try to make a move next year when the Cardinals should be ready to compete again.

— Szermaj
12:28 pm November 1st, 2007

I would have to agree with Fuhrig on the Edmonds contract, giving him two years at that kind of money had to be one of the worst contracts ever given out during Jocketty’s era, I wonder if Mozeliak had anything to do with that contract? I do not mind the Mulder contract though, the Cardinals knew they would not get much out of him in ‘07, the true test is if he can do anything this year.

— Szermaj
12:34 pm November 1st, 2007