Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
02.01.2008 12:43 pm

Decisions 2008: Who’s on second?

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

TOWER GROVE – Although the snow is a nice sendoff for those of us heading south shortly, it’s only further confirmation that spring training is approaching rapidly. The only thing coming faster and with more anticipation is Super Tuesday. And that’s got everybody thinking about voting.

So why not combine the two big February events and hold the Cardinals Nation primaries?

Manager Tony La Russa and his coaching staff will have plenty of Decisions (in) 2008, from who fills the outfield, to who bats leadoff, to who’s on his bench, to who plays second base. Those players will have to sway the coaches with their play, their commitment and, yes, their experience. Sounds almost like an election. 

This PoliSci major — once dreamed of covering the Supreme Court, don’tcha know — was watching the cozy Democrats debate last night and thought maybe it’s time for the Cardinals candidates to take their campaigns to the constituency.

Today, in the first of a series of primaries over the next few business days, the candidates for second base present their cases, in their own words*, to the electorate.

Here’s the ballot, and rock your vote below.

(* Not really. The facts are real, but they aren’t actual quotes.)

*** 

ADAM KENNEDY (From the Left): None other than La Russa himself has said that last year was a blip in an otherwise strong and consistent major-league career. There were a lot of factors weighing it down, not the least of which was a knee injury — that was not the cause of early struggles but had to be repaired. The .219 average is a wart on the baseball card, to be sure, but it does not define the player. A career .275 hitter with a strong glove and winner’s savvy, has more experience than any other candidate. Sure, there are the recent quotes from La Russa and KMOX host Kevin Wheeler’s rather clinical assessment, but all that is motivation, reasons to reclaim a misplaced reputation. Just two years ago, this infielder had Win Share totals like Ian Kinsler, a .300 average, and back-to-back seasons of 70 runs. A career doesn’t plummet that rapidly. T’s crossed, I’s dotted, and that makes a starting second baseman.

Kennedy campaign button

AARON MILES (Swing voter): Each spring it’s the same thing. Come to Jupiter. Try to win a starting job. Never the favorite, but always the eventual winner. Happened with Junior Spivey. Happened with  Kennedy. Why not bet on it happening again? Started 134 games at second base over the past two seasons and it would have been more except for some moonlighting turns, when needed, at shortstop. Flirted with hitting .300 last year until a late-season skid. Still, batted .292 and slugged .353 from the left side of the plate, while posting a .368 on-base percentage from the right side. That number, at least, supports a platoon chance. Probably deserved more at-bats in 2007, a fact La Russa admitted recently when he said Kennedy got the benefit of the doubt even when there were others playing better.  Not the polished glove that others are, or the upside hitter others are, but has played the best when given the opportunity. Why delay the inevitable and just vote now for this starting second baseman. 

Miles campaign button

BRENDAN RYAN (From the Right): Stepped out of the prospect label last season and played well enough for the Cardinals to accept some of his unpolished attributes and attitudes. Was mentored by Scott Rolen and David Eckstein in the ways of being a big leaguer — from tipping the clubbies, to when to show up for groundball practice — and was famously yanked from a game after swinging at a 3-0 pitch. That kind of green won’t win the position, but his athleticism could. Adept at both middle infield positions, though most of his amateur experience (i.e., college) was at second base. Strong arm. Quick feet. Has been more a more consistent glove each season. Speed is a plus. Bat could be. Hit .354/.407/.456 in 79 at-bats against lefthanders. Plenty of promise. Will have to overcome perception he needs another year of Triple-A seasoning to be the starting second baseman.

Ryan, No. 13, campaign button

JARRETT HOFFPAUIR (From the Right): An underdog candidate who could play John Edwards* in this mix, reminding everyone: “This isn’t a two-person race.” Hoffpauir had his breakout minor-league season in 2007, hitting .300 or better at stops in Double-A and Triple-A. As a Springfield Cardinal, the second baseman had an OPS of .938, was the league’s batting average leader at the time of his promotion and was an All-Star. Remember the Prospect SATs? Hoffpauir: Bo Hart: Kinsler, which is to say at his high end he could add a low-order, line-drive punch. Has the best strike-zone judgment in the organization (fewer Ks than walks in every pro season) and could take some swings at leadoff sometime this season. His defense is average, but his bat got him drafted and his bat carries his candidacy to be the starting second baseman.

Hoffpauir, the underdog, campaign button

(* Not to be confused with Jon Edwards, the rocket-arm right fielder.)  

D’ANGELO JIMENEZ (Swing voter): First of the non-roster candidates who enter the fray. Has been with three other teams since his heyday as the second baseman for the Cincinnati Reds. In 2004, he hit .270/.364/.394 with 12 home runs, 99 strikeouts (!) and 67 RBIs. Bounced around and landed with Washington in 2007 before being outrighted at the end of the year. Signed to a minor-league free agent deal but cut from the mold of the experienced infielder who can play a lot of positions. Edges Miles with a 0.00 ERA in 1 1/3 innings of mopup, which might be enough to make him the starting second baseman.

Jimenez campaign license plate

BRIAN BARDEN (From the Right): Plucked off waivers last season from Arizona, Barden won college’s equivalent of the Gold Glove for his work at third base for Oregon State. Shortly after he arrived as a Cardinal, he explained how he saw his calling: It wasn’t at third base. Though he cracked 31 home runs in 2005 and 2006 combined at Triple-A, Barden said he didn’t have the pop to stay at third. He’d have to roam and increase his versatility. Second base could be the calling. Gifted with the glove, Barden is a career .296 hitter in the minors, and his past two full seasons in Triple-A he hit steady — .298/.361/.478 and .307/.363/.483. There’s a lot to like about his reliability and his potential, but spring may not be enough time for him to win the starting job at second base.

For kicks.

Next primaries Monday: Former Cardinals. 

-30-

51 comments

Comments are closed.

Interesting point that Kevin Wheeler makes about Kennedy’s uppercut (in the link with the Kennedy entry). A co-worker from LA, who is a die-hard Angels fan and very knowledgeable baseball guy, was just talking last week about Kennedy’s weird swing. Good point.

— Fuhrig
12:06 am February 3rd, 2008

Enough with this “needs more seasoning” baloney. If the Cards were smart, they’d start Ryan at short and Hoffpauir at second. Get some youth, quickness and pop in the lineup for crying out loud. Energize this stale team. Kennedy, Miles, Izturis and Jimenez are retreads who are serviceable as backups at best. But my money says these mediocre vets start and the youngsters will be the ones hitting the bricks.

— John Homan
9:02 am February 3rd, 2008

I was a little surprised with the disagreement over comment #19… I couldn’t agree more with those sentiments as they currently stand.

I’d like to see Barden stand out in ST and win a roster spot but am optimistic he’ll clear waivers and scrape together some playing time at AAA with Ryan, Hoff, and Martinez. That is to say, I expect the 2008 opening day Cardinals middle infield to be Izturis at short, Kennedy at 2B, and Miles backing them up.

— Liam
2:01 pm February 3rd, 2008

Barden is a slick fielder, but he has yet to translate his hitting at AAA into the majors. I think he needs to do that before he beats out Kennedy and/or Ryan. Same thing goes for Hoffpauir, although I look forward to his getting a fair shot at second.

— hugeCardfan
12:24 am February 4th, 2008

This probably sounds naive, but is Edgar Gonzalez completely out of the picture in St. Louis? Will he at least be invited to spring training? He’s been an extremely successful minor-league hitter. He’s seems to have a bit of pop for a middle infielder and can at least steal a few bases, too. Is his defense that bad? Of course, he’s already 29, but that’s just the age when LaRussa seems to warm up to a player.

How do you pronounce Luhnow? Hoffpauir?

— Fuhrig
12:54 pm February 4th, 2008

Completely agree with clevy328 in post No. 28. This supposed “youth movement” will never take place with TLR as manager. There will always be some castoff retread that will be signed and played ahead of younger guys with promise like Ryan, Barden, whomever.

I would start with Ryan at short and Kennedy at second, but I’d have Kennedy on a short leash. And yes, I’d look to trade Kennedy, althought I doubt you could get much. However, I know Miles will be in the mix because TLR is in love with him. To me, Miles isn’t even a good utility option because 1) he’s really only capable of playing 2B reasonably well, he doesn’t play 3B or OF, and he is scary at SS, and 2) he ’s slow afoot. It would be nice if we had some speed on this team, and the only real potential source is going to be in the middle infield positions and off the bench.

— Mike
1:18 pm February 4th, 2008

DG,

The current #19 is a sincere, gushing, complementary comment written by a woman to you. Not initially understanding that you replaced the original, vulgar, #19, I couldn’t figure out why everyone found her compliment so revolting. Funny stuff.

— Joe G
2:37 pm February 4th, 2008

RYAN ANYWHERE, GIVE ‘em A SHOT

— Cardiger
10:38 pm February 4th, 2008

Play the young guys. Miles stinks, Kennedy’s HGH wore off, and a Red’s scrub are not recipes for success. It doesn’t matter anyway this team isn’t going anywhere. If they are lucky they will win 75-80 games.

— LaRussa stinks
9:42 pm February 5th, 2008

DG,

I may be alone in believing that the younger Cardinals would be better off if they were mixed into the grind with a group of veterans. But having said that, it seems to me that the payroll is really shifting around. Dropping X, Rolen and Edmonds and picking up Glaus (still less than Rolen) and a bunch of ‘may-bees’ and ‘wanna-bees’ certainly creates a financial windfall for ownership.

While I agree that it doesn’t make sense to pursue pitching that is over priced, what player isn’t over priced? And to that end, who is on the Pricing Committee? It certainly appears as if the Cardinals pricing formula may be biased on the low side and doesn’t include a factor for ‘change in LLC income’ to keep up with the revenue inflation that all the other members of MLB seem to have recognized.

— Joe G
3:02 pm February 6th, 2008

Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 » Show All