The Cards’ Mitchell Quotient
JUPITER, Fla. — In the fallout of baseball’s nuclear winter of steroid revelations, apologies and denials, spring training has added a new tradition.
It’s the Mitchell moment.
During the first weeks of spring training, a handful of teams have had a player mentioned in the Mitchell Report arrive and answer a salvo of questions about being cited in the record of baseball’s Steroid Era. If it appears like more of those stories are coming out of Cardinals camp than others, that’s because they are.
An audit of 89 players mentioned in the Mitchell Report as allegedly purchasing, possessing or using banned substances revealed that most are retired or out of organized baseball. Five are at Cardinals’ major-league spring training.
That’s more than the NL East teams have combined and almost as many as the six players at the other NL Central spring trainings. By this count, the five Mitchell-named players in Cardinals’ camp are more than twice as many at any other spring training.
Several of the Cardinals in camp had already answered questions about the report before this spring: Ryan Franklin (suspended for 10-days in 2005), Troy Glaus (at the presser announcing the trade), Rick Ankiel (last September). Franklin and Ankiel have been the most direct with their answers, while Glaus has acknowledged he met with the commissioner’s office and not been suspended, but declines to offer a public explanation for the report that linked him to steroids.
The two others — Juan Gonzalez and Ron Villone – arrived on the same day this spring and spent about 10 minutes each addressing the report.
Gonzalez rejected its allegations — which are reprints of a New York Daily News article that described a border patrol inquiry into a bag that contained steroids and allegedly belong to Gonzalez or his trainer. On his first day back in a big-league camp, Gonzalez said he “never used” and was “clear.”
Villone said the report has “inaccuracies.” But he plans no legal action.
Then there is the article in today’s newspaper that the Cardinals, namely manager Tony La Russa, suggested the team pursue Barry Bonds this past winter. The suggestion was quickly rejected. One reason: The Cardinals spent the winter professing a wish to get younger, broaden the number of in-house prospects invited to spring and send up a flare of the direction the club was headed. There was internal hand-wringing that signing Gonzalez, even on a minor-league deal, ran contrary to that plan.
When asked if Bonds’ off-field events were a concern, La Russa told us Sunday that that his eye focuses on how a player “fits” the team’s need between the lines and in the clubhouse.
The Cardinals had a similar answer about adding Villone.
It became a baseball decision, they said.
(Aside: If MLB does continue to look into the allegations of the Mitchell Report, it’s been reported that suspensions could follow. The commissioner’s office has already released a statement that Glaus and Ankiel would not face punishment. The Cardinals received no assurances on Villone or others.)
The Mitchell Report is careful to point out that no team was untouched by the steroid culture and every team had a representative. The spectrum ran from four to 23 former/current players. The Cardinals were in the middle, with 11 former/current players mentioned when the report came out in December.
Before the reports publication, ownership said it would not guide their decisions. Chairman Bill DeWitt told colleague Joe Strauss:
“When we’re considering acquiring players, it’s not really something on our radar unless someone has knowledge of it. And we don’t have that knowledge at this point. There are some rumors and innuendoes out there, but without facts you can’t base decisions on what you don’t know.”
This spring, it’s been something the Cardinals have considered, something they’ve looked into, something they’ve assessed on a case-by-case basis (the amount of info and time to research Glaus was different than that on, say, Villone). Officials have repeatedly said that even after the publication of the Mitchell Report access to a full spectrum of information is limited.
But need or intrigue has also guided the team’s choices.
“When you are dealing with players who are named in that, you do have to look into it,” GM John Mozeliak said. “You are limited to the amount of information you can get, but we did our due diligence, as much as we could. … Hearing the different sides of it it is something we can put behind us and move forward.”
-30-



Derrick Goold told everyone he was going to Mizzou for capital-J journalism, but really after growing up in the Time Zone Baseball Forgot he was drawn to MU's primo location between two major-league cities. Goold joined the Post-Dispatch in 2001 after working for The Times-Picayune and Rocky Mountain News, covering sports from LSU to NHL and every level of baseball inbetween.
Why do you have to rehash the same nonsense about Cardinals players and steroid allegations? We know all this stuff already and it’s getting old. I look forward to your blog updates from spring training… I check them religiously. However, what we look for in those updates is news about spring training (as you’ve been doing every day). So unless there is another blog update forthcoming that details today’s activities, I will be very disaapointed.