Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
03.26.2008 5:13 pm

Ludwick’s wicked case of deja vu

JUPITER, Fla. — Back in 2005, Ryan Ludwick had his best shot yet at the big-league club. He was on the team coming out of spring training, had survived the surge of a young turk named Grady Sizemore and was going to get a chance to hit into more playing time and see where more playing time took him.

And then, after 41 at-bats with Cleveland, the following transactions took place on May 31:

CLE – Activated OF JUAN GONZALEZ from the 15-day disabled list; designated OF RYAN LUDWICK for assignment.

Things were never the same for Ludwick.

“He blew out his hamstring in his first at-bat, but I didn’t get to be the guy that came back,” Ludwick said earlier this spring. “I cleared waivers and I stayed down. That’s how it goes. Then I had the worst three months of my career. I was so flustered that I probably just let that get to me mentally. It was awful.”

Ludwick spun into a couple years slowed by injury and happenstance before finally surfacing with the Cardinals in 2007. He came into spring training this year having established himself as a viable bench player in the National League with a chance to force a platoon at one of the corner outfield positions. In the first week of camp he told me that he finally felt like he was “finally getting over that label of injury-prone.” But don’t think he didn’t look across the clubhouse and notice who was back in his life:

Gonzalez.

What had the chance at being a tricky clash for the Cardinals this spring fizzled quickly. Gonzalez couldn’t get healthy. Ludwick, though slow at the start, couldn’t be denied a spot. The Cardinals made their move with Gonzalez (abdominal strain) official Wednesday, placing the two-time MVP — who entranced some members of the organization with his swing and his history — on the temporarily inactive list. Ludwick will, as expected, be going north with the club and could be eyeing a opening day against Colorado lefty Jeff Francis.

Ludwick elevated his spring average to .313 on Thursday with a couple hits and a couple RBIs in the Cardinals 8-2 victory against Baltimore. He did what he can do: Smoke the ball for extra bases (his hits were both doubles) and handle deftly all three outfield positions (after entering the game as a pinch runner he played left, right, left again and center field).

The righthanded-hitting, lefthanded-throwing Ludwick came to spring training with a tighter, more compact swing. He rejected the characterization that he “changed his swing”, but his description of how he “improved” his swing seemed more than a minor tweak. He altered his hands and shortened how he cocks the bat back before he swing — all to get a swing that could better handle inside pitches, better connect with what those lefties were offering him.

“It’s not a drastic change, though,” he said. ”It’s very, very minor adjustment. So fastballs in you can drive. I felt like lefthanders with good cutters, like a guy like Ted Lilly, when he threw fastballs in, I’d get long around it instead of staying inside it. It’s not the same swing.”

That was the conundrum of Ludwick last season.

He had reverse splits. Righthanders — particularly ones who threw hard — he hammered. He struggled against lefties. It did not make him a natural platoon for any of the many lefthanded hitters the Cardinals had last summer, nor any of the lefties they had competing for jobs this spring. Hard to pair Ludwick with, say, Skip Schumaker if both had troubles with lefties. Even today, manager Tony La Russa did not know what to make of Ludwick’s swings against lefties this spring.

Better, yes. But not yet enough to say he’s prime for a platoon.

And that is where this spring could have been dicey, but wasn’t. Gonzalez comes in with a tremendous history against lefthanded pitchers. He has a career .602 slugging percentage and a .977 OPS against lefties, and that would have been the role La Russa eyed for him. He could come of the bench as a power threat or he could see controlled time as a starter when a lefty was on the mound. Had Gonzalez been healthy — and hitting like he was early in the came when one official said “he excited us all” — and Brian Barton put on the game display he did, there would have been a squeeze.

“We would have had to confront some decisions,” La Russa said.

Those decisions could have been a serious case of deja vu for Ludwick.

His play made sure it wasn’t. No abdominal strain necessary.

“I was telling my wife this offseason that I feel like I’m 7-years old-again,” Ludwick said. “I haven’t been this excited about being here in a along time. There’s an extra excitement.”

***

Barton was fine after being clocked in the nose by a breaking pitch during Wednesday’s game. The outfielder took a pitch to the face and had to be helped off the field, but afterward he barely showed any welt whatsoever from the shot. Once the bleeding from his nose stopped, he said, it was clear that the ball didn’t connect with any bone.

***

For the numerologists out there: Barton will wear No. 54 when he arrives at Busch Stadium as a big leaguer Monday. Kyle McClellan will wear No. 46.

***

The Cardinals made their roster moves official this afternoon, sending out relievers Hugo Castellanos, Cliff Politte and Chris Perez. As mentioned before in the blog, Castellanos will continue to travel with the team as a backup.

***

The Cardinals are in the market for a bona fide lefty specialist that could bump Ron Villone back to the innings role he was originally signed to provide. The availability of Steve Kline does not interest the club as they’d like find someone who has an option remaining or that would not be a brief rental. A core concern in this search is how long will take Tyler Johnson to recover from a strained rotator cuff.

***

From the Job Security File. Here’s when you know a player has been around the team awhile, earned some cred with the coaches and quite possibly has won a World Series ring with the manager: Aaron Miles pops his head into La Russa’s office the other day and says, “Hey, Tone, what time do we report tomorrow.”

Once the infield leaves, a report asks La Russa: “Tone?”

La Russa looked befuddled.

“How many players get away with calling you ‘Tone’?” I asked.

“He’s a player-coach,” La Russa said.

-30-

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (18 votes, average: 4.67 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
20 comments

Comments are closed.

Regarding Miles.

LaRussa has a serious soft spot for the little fella.

Slappy McMiles should be very happy Tony didn’t call it quits. The best he could have gotten elsehwere was a minor league contract and a spring invite.

— Kevin
6:01 pm March 26th, 2008

Would it have been better to say…..

He could have kicked his dog and got away with it

— Kevin
6:08 pm March 26th, 2008

Kevin,

Had to tidy up the reference a little bit, if you don’t mind. Still, your point is a valid opinion — La Russa did lobby for Miles’ return to the club. That said, he would have done just fine on the open market. He’d have gotten a big-league contract. No prob.

dg
-30-

— Derrick Goold
6:17 pm March 26th, 2008

Kevin,

Maybe. Yes, that would have been better.

dg

— Derrick Goold
6:17 pm March 26th, 2008

54? what kind of number is that? that is definitely not a position player number. i would have stuck with 66.

— fewgoodcards
6:40 pm March 26th, 2008

DG,

Don’t mind the tidying up at all. It came off a little more rough around the edges than I intended.

On to Miles, I guess I’ll just have to disagree. I can’t think of many teams that would be beating down the door of a bench player who can only play one position (effectively) and only has one tool (contact). I don’t remember hearing about anyone being interested. You would know better than me, so if I’m wrong please correct me.

Nowhere near good enough to be a starter, not enough versatility to be on the bench. I think TLR sees a little bit of him self in Miles. I seriously doubt he could have gotten anything more than an invite to ST. He’s the type of guy that gets 600 AB’s in AAA, and is called up only if there is an injury to a starter that won’t require a long DL stint.

— Kevin
6:50 pm March 26th, 2008

DG,

Had one question for you, but my distaste for Miles got in the way :)

Regarding Mather, Do you know if the club plans to give him some innings at 3B? Seems like that might be his best way here. As a utility guy that can back up both the corner IF, and OF spots with some pop. Kinda like Spiezio.

— Kevin
7:07 pm March 26th, 2008

not to quibble too much w/you Kevin, as we are largely on the same page, (minus the animal abuse reference :) )

but are you giving Miles–bless his Bo Heart–the benefit of the doubt by rounding up to one?

— HoosierCardFan
7:55 pm March 26th, 2008

It is encouraging to hear a guy like Ludwick taking the initiative to improve his swing. I thought he was a very good role player last year, but the Cards are dying for an OF that can hit LHP.

DG, How many AB has he had against LHP this spring, and how has he looked? Does he look less vulnerable to the strikeout with the shorter swing? Do you think it will cost him any power?

Thanks in advance.

— Elliott
8:31 pm March 26th, 2008

If Miles were to get a bit more disciplined at the plate, he would make a pretty darn good pinch hitter off the bench. He can be a pain in the butt with runners on at times.

I fight for the underdog, and like the way Miles and Ludwick battle. They will either be useful off the bench in St. Louis or potentially as part of a package trade.

— Cardsballhawk
10:05 pm March 26th, 2008

Big league contract in Japan, maybe. But the Cardinals are the only one in NA that would take him and Izturis and put them on the active roster. At least Miles can hit .300, which is more than Izturis can do. But neither can do anything else, like hit for power or get on base or field more than adequately.

— JeremyR
5:10 am March 27th, 2008

Saw some questions, and one wacky statement, so some answers and one rebuttal:

– Mather will play outfield and first base in Memphis. If he appears at third base it will be out of need because of injury or illness. There is no plan — today — to groom him as a utility player at all the corners. That kind of thing would happen next spring or out of necessity. (It is something to note that going into the season the Cardinals do not have a true backup if Troy Glaus is out for the long time; his replacement would be Brendan Ryan.)

– Not sure how AB Ludwick has had against lefties this spring. It’s been enough that the mgr brought up Ludwick’s continued reverse splits yesterday. It baffles La Russa. And, nope, it won’t cost him any power. That would have been a bad change to make to his swing.

– You lost me when you said Izturis cannot “field more than adequately.” Look, the infielder has had a rough spring and his career offense isn’t anything to build a marketing campaign around. But he can field. Yes, the errors this spring. But Izturis can field. Your comment on March 27th about his fielding will be different come April 27th.

dg
-30-

— Derrick Goold
7:29 am March 27th, 2008

DG,

Isn’t Ryan at 3B at least what you had a few years ago with Nunez there? From the sound of it, his defense has been pretty good over there.

I agree with you on Izturis. Guys, stop looking at box scores, and actually watch the guy play. He is not only “more than adequate,” but I contend that he is better defensively than Renteria. He reminds me very much of Royce Clayton. Exceptional range, soft hands, a very quick release, and a better than average arm. He isn’t going to hit much; but if Kennedy, Duncan, Schumaker, Molina, and Ankiel all produce at even a conservative estimate of what they are capable then it won’t matter what Izturis hits.

— Elliott
8:07 am March 27th, 2008

Hey Derr,

If you and Bern and Gord aren’t doing anything for lunch, I’m free.

t

— tdanlaw
8:33 am March 27th, 2008

If the Cards are looking for a “bone fide lefty specialist,” how about a guy who has held left-handed batters to .215/.282/.292 so far in his career? That’s Ron Flores. Smallish sample size, yes. But, yowza, what a line.

— Bob
9:14 am March 27th, 2008

FWIW, Miles walked 37 times in 846 AB\’s with the Rockies in 2004 and 2005.

With the Cards in 2006 and 2007, he’s walked 63 times in 840 AB\’s.

That\’s a 70% increase in his walk rate. Not bad.

Also FWIW, he also cut his K rate a little bit… 91 K\’s in 2004/5, 82 K in 2006/7.

I don\’t know why it is, but the fans always seem to take out their frustrations on our utility players - I remember all the flak guys like David Howard, Shawon Dunston, Mike Gallego, and Craig Paquette took when *they* were here. The Miles-hate is just more of the same.

— Jerry Modene
11:31 am March 27th, 2008

It’s probably a fair comparison between Nunez and Ryan, with Ryan being a better overall player. But don’t make that statement in hindsight. When the Cardinals were left with Abraham Nunez at third, did you think that was going to work as well as it did?

Also when you look at those walk totals, sure they’re improved (vastly), but also keep in mind Miles has been hitting plenty in front of the pitcher as a Cardinal and spent a long time at leadoff as a Rockie.

dg
-30-

— Derrick Goold
11:37 am March 27th, 2008

DG:

Thanks for the piece on Ludwick. I had no idea there was a previous connection to Ludwick and Jaun Gone.

As for Barton’s choice of 54 being “definitely not a position player’s number” wasn’t wille McGee’s number somewhere in the 50’s?

Hey guys, if were going to keep referencing kicking small furry animals can we at least leave the puppies alone and go after some bear cubs insead? ( allowing we do not come btween them and their mothers)

— garden gnome
11:58 am March 27th, 2008

Not sure a Garden Gnome should be talking about doing any damage to small furry animals. These are dangerous times in the shrubbery.

— Derrick Goold
12:29 pm March 27th, 2008

Elliott,

I spent a week watching Iz2 field and I was not at all impressed. Brendan Ryan has significantly more range, is quicker on the turn and has better hands. Iz2 was very lucky not to have 4 or 5 more errors than he was given by the scorekeepers, just in that one week, and he wasn’t any better in the fielding practice on the backfields.

He may have gotten fixed in the 2 weeks since then, but I’ll require a lot of convincing. There seems to be a coordinated disinformation campaign going on, starting with the front office and reaching out to the sportswriters, to cast izturis as a “great” fielder, but at best he’s average. Average won’t make up for his offensive ineptitude.

FWIW, renteria wasn’t very good either, and eckstein was awful.

— SleepyCA
12:55 pm March 27th, 2008
Derrick Goold