The World for Colby Rasmus
TOWER GROVE — A chorus of sources in the past couple weeks have all belted the same tune when it comes to the Cardinals: Any discussion with the local club about possible trades starts with the understanding Colby Rasmus ain’t going anywhere.
Scouts have said it. Other beat writers have heard it. We’ve reported it.
When reports in Pittsburgh — including this one from the Post-Gazette’s beat writer Dejan Kovacevic – surfaced yesterday that Jason Bay “could be had”, the Cardinals were linked to the outfielder because of several years of courtship. Their interest came with a caveat: Rasmus was untouchable. Colleague Joe Strauss hit chairman Bill DeWitt Jr. for his definition of untouchable during a Q&A session at the All-Star break. You’ve all read it (here), to be sure, but here’s the germane excerpt:
Strauss: Is there a chance that Rasmus could play his first major-league game in another uniform?
BDJ: I don’t anticipate that. No.
That’s the message that has gotten around baseball. Despite a slow start, despite a knee injury, the Cardinals perceive Rasmus’ value as much — and probably far more so — as Baseball America’s recent midseason re-ranking of the prospect.
The publication put him as fourth-best in baseball, three behind Matt LaPorta, the prospect that landed Milwaukee C.C. Sabathia.
The chance to land Sabathia (and their depth of minor-league talent) led the Brewers to consider trading their “top” prospect, and there are all sorts of deals that lead teams to redefine the word “untouchable.” Recently, one of the finer and most-established baseball blogs out there — Athletics Nation — pondered the kind of package of players it would take to get the Cardinals to reconsider “untouchable.”
In an entry from July 20, Athletics Nation suggests a mega-package of major-league players to land one minor leaguer: Rasmus. Check out the proposal here:
“The Final Sell-Off: How the A’s Can Land an Elite Hitter”
The breakdown of the deal presented: The Cardinals send Rasmus to Oakland for 2B Mark Ellis, SS Bobby Crosby, RHP Justin Duchscherer, LHP Alan Embree and closer Huston Street. Hard to imagine a package of players who could fill — best-case situation — many of the Cardinals’ needs.
Even harder to imagine it happening.
But it’s a fascinating mental exercise on both ends. How do the Cardinals hold on to the organizational philosophy of building from within for the good of the future when a package like that could so radically change the immediate future? How much are the A’s willing to give up for one bat?
With an hour to go before the trade deadline, thought it would be a good debate on just what ”untouchable” means this time of year, and if there is an another team out there that could offer a package that would change the definition of Rasmus or, for that matter, Kyle Lohse? A few months of Sabathia isn’t enough in exchange for Rasmus. True. Bay and one of those Pirates pitchers? A few months of Brian Fuentes? Several seasons of … George Sherrill?
Five-for-one is an unrealistic haul, bordering on one made for baseball cards not baseball players. But it’s a fascinating what-if scenario.
-30-


Derrick Goold said he was going to Mizzou for capital-J journalism, but after growing up in the Time Zone Baseball Forgot he was really drawn to MU sitting between two major-league cities. Goold joined the Post-Dispatch in 2001 after working for The Times-Picayune and Rocky Mountain News, covering sports from LSU to NHL and every level of baseball in between.
I haven’t heard his name mentioned in any trade talks todate, but what is the value of SS Brian Barden at Memphis/USA Olympic team? Could he be packaged, along with say Chris Perez for the O’s lefty closer Sherrill?
Unfortunately for whatever reason Rasmus is an untouchable. Here’s a question though.
What if he turns out to be injury prone like J.D. Drew????
Considering the Cards got Barden late last season by claiming him off waivers, I doubt MLB teams see him, yet, as having a lot of value or being worth picking up. As good a year as he’s had, I have a feeling the Cards may even let him go minor-league FA this winter by not putting him on the 40-man roster (he *was* on the 40-man roster after we picked him up from the D’backs, but took him off over the winter).
Mike,
An interesting question, but one that offers instant context. The Mets’ starter Saturday, Brandon Knight, is also an Olympian. Also, every team in baseball had their shot at Barden earlier this season — and many have had two shots at him in the past 12 months. The Cardinals got him off waivers last season and they got him through waivers at the start of this season.
Not sure Olympian automatically equals desirable.
dg
-30-
Untouchable…hmmm. What does it mean to me from a fans standpoint? Yes, I believe their is a “reasonable” package out there to be had for Rasmus. The question is; is the Cardinal upper management being “unreasonable”? That is my definition of UNTOUCHABLE.
Please excuse me for my grammer error. It should “there” instead of their after the word “believe”…sorry.
Drelboc,
How dare you! For shame! Grammar errors. Tsk. Tsk.
I kid. Happens to the best.
dg
Rich - it is equally as fair to ask “What if Rasmus turns out to be Grady Sizemore”
I see no difference in those two questions: each are equally as hard to project.
Derrick,
Just because every team passed on him this past spring, doesn’t mean he has no value. 29 teams passed on Ryan Ludwick at the end of the 2006 season and look at where he is today.
And 29 teams passed 12 times on Albert Pujols. (Thank God for clueless baseball people.)
-Mike
Apples meeting oranges, especially in the Pujols comparison. The Ludwick comparison is a little more plausible. But Barden was a known quantity when the Cardinals picked him up. He’s a quality glove with a good enough bat to make him a utility player in the major leagues. He would draw interest from teams who need that kind of player, but the Olympic stamp doesn’t add to his value, nor does it suddenly reveal it.