Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
08.03.2008 1:20 am

Name the Cardinals’ All-Time 3 Stars

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

DOWNTOWN — Back in my early days at the P-D covering hockey, the selection of the “Three Stars” at each game was, loosely, my responsibility. Toward the end of the game, a quick straw poll was taken of the other writers in the box. Sometimes the selections were obvious. Sometimes they weren’t. Sometimes they drew compliments. A few times they sparked debate. My name was on the box score, so I took it seriously.

(Ask Chris Kerber about Jean-Sebastien Giguere sometime.)

Tonight ESPN takes hockey’s “Three Star” tradition and applies it to baseball, with a broader, historic range of candidates.

According to a paragraph in Saturday’s Cardinals’ games notes, ESPN’s Baseball Tonight’s panel of experts will begin a monthlong debate on the “top three players all-time for each francise.” The discussion begins tonight and as prelude to the Cardinals-Phillies telecast from Busch Stadium, the Cardinals are the first to get the three-star treatment.

A poll of fans conducted at ESPN.com will help augment the experts’ selections.

But why wait?

During Saturday’s game, we kicked around the three-star concept. Would Evan Longoria already rank in Tampa Bay’s Fab 3? Certainly Carl Crawford is No. 1. How do you pick three New York Yankees? I mean after Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig, that is. Is there a modern player who will crack the top-three lists of the historic franchises — the 18 who were around in 1961, for example? Two candidates: Barry Bonds, obviously, and, in LA, Mike Piazza.

To settle on a Cardinals’ “Three Stars”, we started on the wall.

Out in left field at Busch Stadium, there’s a good shortlist of candidates for the top-three list: They are the retired numbers. With Ducky Medwick and Albert Pujols as, arguably, the only exceptions, the retired numbers will provide the Cardinals’ top three. They are:

1 — Ozzie Smith … 2 — Red Schoendienst … 6 — Stan Musial … 9 — Enos Slaughter … 14 — Ken Boyer … 17 — Dizzy Dean … 20 — Lou Brock … 42 — Bruce Sutter … 45 — Bob Gibson. … STL — Rogers Hornsby.

This is the starting place for any ranking of the top three all-time players in Cardinals history. The online poll is likely to reflect its times, heavily weighing toward modern players or living legends. That said, as Hall of Famer  Rick Hummel and I discussed the “Three Stars” from Cardinals’ history and wondered who should skate away with those honors, there appeared to be two locks and a few candidates for No. 3.

Offer up yours in the comment area below. Mine? Mine:

  1. Musial
  2. Gibson
  3. Hornsby

-30-

136 comments

Comments are closed.

Those are the same three I’d choose. Good call DG…

— cardsrul
2:00 am August 3rd, 2008

1. Musial

2. Gibby

3. Albert (by the time he is done…does that count?)

— GForce9
4:03 am August 3rd, 2008

Answered my own question. I agree with you as well, DG. Though I want to put the Wizard in there, I know it is only because of my childhood.

— GForce9
4:05 am August 3rd, 2008

Couldn’t agree more as these guys had HUGE performance, influence on the game, or both –
1) Stan the Man - pure hitter
2) Gibby - pure power
3) El Hombre - hitter with power
Looking at retirees only, and looking performance and influence you’ve gotta go with add either Hornsby or Brock. Can we make it Top 4??

— George in London
5:49 am August 3rd, 2008

I think Albert belongs. My 3 are:
Stan Musial
Bob Gibson
Albert Pujols

Good arguments can be made for Rogers Hornsby and Ozzie Smith, but if confined to three picks, I take 6, 45 and 5. 6manfan

— 6man fan
6:27 am August 3rd, 2008

I agree. It’s too early to tell about Albert, but maybe he’ll take over the number three slot eventually. He might even be number two and push Gibby to number three. Stan the Man will always and forever be number one.

— Robert
6:42 am August 3rd, 2008

I agree with DG, Musial was easily the greatest Cardinal, Gibson was the greatest pitcher. Hornsby brought ST Louis their first World Series ever. He was also probably the greatest 2nd baseman. He hit for power in a time when there wasn’t much power. The man also batted over .400 multiple times, you can’t leave him out.

— emallory
6:44 am August 3rd, 2008

Can’t go wrong with your three DG…I really liked seeing Hornsby in there because I don’t believe he gets the overall notice he deserves in Cardinal history (more by the fans then anyone else). The Rajah is arguable the greatest righthanded hitter of all time.
One other name I want to throw out for consideration even though he isn’t in the group…Ted Simmons. I’m not saying he should be one of the three, but I think he deserves consideration in this group…and 23 should be retired!

— HighHeat23
7:16 am August 3rd, 2008

100% agreement.

— David
8:18 am August 3rd, 2008

1. Musial
2. Gibson
3. Brock

— Tom Roberts
8:21 am August 3rd, 2008

Top three has got to include Musial and Gibson and after that number three boils down to either Ozzie or Albert.

— Dave
8:34 am August 3rd, 2008

Musial, Hornsby, Gibson

— Leo Fontanella
8:47 am August 3rd, 2008

DG,

Hornsby, Musial and Gibby are the top selections (not in that order). I don’t think there is any question. To have seen 2 of the 3 greatest Cardinals play in 3 Busch Stadiums has been a privilege. Albert may earn his way onto this list but he has quite a few years to go.

— MTBleedRed18
8:49 am August 3rd, 2008

In a slam dunk I have to agree with you DG. The Players you picked came to mind when I first started reading your article. In fairness to the players of the dead ball era I had to cast a vote toward Hornsby for the third slot. He led the Cards to their first World Series title in 1926. He was Branch Ricky’s first defining gem of a player.

Musial has to be number one for so many reasons. But to make this brief how about the well known fact that Stan the Man was a Cardinal his entire career and played in 24 ALLSTAR games during his HOF 22 year career.

I cast my second vote for Bob Gibson. He also played his entire career in St. Louis. His Hall of Fame feats are many also. But my gosh we BIRD LAND birds all should know what a fearsome competitor Gibby was. I loved his attitude with ball players from the other team. He treated them as an enemy. No fraternizing with the other side. Also, when he took the ball he was not looking for bullpen help to get him a win. He planned on pitching NINE every game. Another era gone by. I miss that era so much. The love of money has taken much of the flavor out of the game.

But here they are in Bird Land pecking order:

Stan “the Man” Musial
Bob Gibson
Rogers Hornsby

Very special mention to Lou Brock AND Ozzie Smith. We’ll see where Pujols lands when his career is over. Hopefully the HOF will have number 5 landing in it one day wearing the Birds on the Bat also.

— drelboc
9:14 am August 3rd, 2008

There are clearly five players on this list. Musial is automatic. Gibson, Hornsby, Ozzie and Pujols are the other four. It’s a tough cut down to three. Gibby seems obvious, but you can make a case for Hornsby and Pujols instead. It’s the impossible argument of pitchers vs. hitters. Ozzie is probably the easiest (yet difficult) cut of the five, which tells you what a tough list it is.

Even without projecting anything, in a career of eight season, I think you have to include Albert. He already brings almost everything to the table that the other top candidates have.

– Leader of the team in an era that includes a World Championship and post season in five of seven seasons.
– Offensive monster. No need to preach to the choir on this one.
– Gold glover. Won the award in only his third full season at first base, which must be something close to unprecedented. (Aside: Thinking of otheres winning GGs at new positions, Mark Grudzielanek won it in KC in his seventh season at 2B.)
– Highly decorated career. 1 MVP (should be two, maybe three), 1 GG, rookie of the year, batting title.

The only thing lacking for Albert is longevity, if eight years isn’t good enough for you. Hornsby had “only” 11 full seasons in St. Louis, leaving at age 30. It’s no knock on the Rajah, but he only played part of his best seasons in St. Louis, so that’s one reason to favor the others. I would rather list five, but if it has to be three:

Musial
Pujols
Gibson

— Fuhrig
9:16 am August 3rd, 2008

1. Musial
2. Gibson
3. Ozzie
3A. Brock

— Dan
9:18 am August 3rd, 2008

Right now is has to be:

Musial Gibson Hornsby

You can’t put Albert on their just yet. He will likely end up on their and may crack into the top two, or even the top. But we have to wait until his numbers flesh out.

Hornsby was player/manager of our first World Title team. He hit over .400 a few times. He was the inspiration for Ted Williams hitting style.

I think you also have to take championships into account. Part of what makes Musial so fantastic is not that he was our best hitter, but that he had the most successful run as our star player. Let’s hope Albert will give Stan a run for his money ;-)

— RCJ
9:26 am August 3rd, 2008

It is difficult, indeed, to pick only three. Musial is a lock, of course, and it would be impossible to argue with Gibson. But who is number 3? A case can be made for most of those others have chosen, so it is more a matter of deciding who to leave off. In my list, I drop Hornsby and Ozzie as they both had part of their career elsewhere. If Carlton had stayed longer with the Cardinals, he would fit that description as well. One name I haven’t seen but who, I believe, deserves mention is Curt Flood. He remains my all-time favorite Cardinal center fielder, but doesn’t make my top three. Only injury keeps Dizzy off the list. My pick for right now is Lou Brock at number 3. But my prediction is that in another 10 years, number three will go to big number 5, Albert Pujols. So:

1. Musial
2. Gibson
3. Brock (until 2018, then Pujols)

— E. C. Walker
9:33 am August 3rd, 2008

Musial and Gibson are the obvious top two. Not counting Albert yet, the number 3 slot is a bit tougher and more open to personal choice. The 80’s were my favorite Cardinal era and Ozzie was my favorite player so I am going with him for the number 3 slot. Hard for me to leave out Lou as he was my favorite 70’s era player.

— LandShark
9:43 am August 3rd, 2008

Who else could it be. Gibby is one of the best pitchers ever. And Stan the Man, Mr. Cardinal. Hornsby is the name anyone who knows Cardinal Baseball would name. Good call

— Janice Holland
9:46 am August 3rd, 2008

The 2 obvious are Musial and Hornsby, who hit .400 3 times as a Cardinal, unbelieveable numbers by todays standards. The third I am not quite so sure about, mayber its Ozzie

— 10XCHP
9:47 am August 3rd, 2008

agreed - funny you mentioned how many would lean toward living legends, only to have so many comments picking others over Rogers Hornsby, one of the greatest baseball players of all time. If Pujols ends his career with a .358 average like Hornsby, then he’ll get the nod.

Now - what about the Phillies??

1) Schmidt
2) Carlton
3) Ashburn?

— matt
9:50 am August 3rd, 2008

Pujols
Gibson
Musial

No Brainer

— EZManstl
9:57 am August 3rd, 2008

Musial, Gibson, and Hornsby are absolutely correct. Nobody else even close. Albert isn’t in the top five(Ozzie and Brock)

— toadman777
9:58 am August 3rd, 2008

Hornsby HAS to be in there - he AVERAGE .400 over FIVE seasons….FIVE SEASONs!!! STAN has to be in there - no justification required…..

I love Gibby - but Dizzy was Gibby before Gibby so I am torn on # 3…

the good news is there is a number of these guys to choose from…:)

What about Frankie Frisch? Marty Marion? Jesse Haines (19 years - 210 wins), Jim Bottomley?? Steve Carton - oh wait…..nevermind…

Speaking of Bottomley - How bout the BROWNIES - prior to O’s???

— Sheckmen
10:43 am August 3rd, 2008

1.

— ron meyer
11:02 am August 3rd, 2008

1. Musial 2. McGwire 3. Hornsby

— ron meyer
11:08 am August 3rd, 2008

This is a hard choice, only 3? Well here goes; Every St. Louis boy from my generation grew up on the stories of Stan “The Man” Musial. My father saw him play and as a child, I attended his last home game at the old Busch on Grand. His records are those others wish to attain. In fact, if Stan had played in any other city than St. Louis, i.e., New York, no one would have ever heard of DiMaggio. In fact the only thing Joe D. accomplished was a 56 game hitting streak. So CArdinal #1 is #6.

I have to agree with Bob Gibson. I live in Central Illinois now, CArdinal Country over the hated Cubbies, and the concensus is that when you needed one game, had to have that game, Gibby was the man. He backed down from no hitter, in fact, unlike todays prima donnas, he refused to let a hitter get comfortable in the batter’s box. He would associate with other pitchers during All-Star competition, and focussed on the opposing players as the enemy. The best of a CArdinals nation in pitching.

I’m tied up over the 3rd member, I can see Dizzy, Rogers, Lou and Enos, but I go towards the Wizzard. Ozzie was the man on defense, became an offensive threat and was the thread that kept the Cardinals as a perennial threat and World Series Champion during the 80’s. Forget the flip on opening day, look at the only homer he ever hit left handed agfainst the Dodgers in the 85 playoffs. The Wizzard.

— mhammer1958
11:30 am August 3rd, 2008

I think Musial & Gibson as numbers 1 & 2, respectively, are no-brainers. As for #3, I’m not sure how Derrick gave Hornsby the nod over Brock, because estimating the value of each against the other is something of an apples-to oranges comparison. And no numbers cruncher could better measure the importance of Brock than my Cardinal red soul! The same sentiment, I’m sure, goes for those who witnessed Hornsby. To me, these two share the number 3 slot…for now. As many have suggested (and presumably hope), Pujols may well eventually have to be listed in the top 3. If the Yankees don’t lure him away, Albert may even challenge for the near-sacred top spot, don’t you think?

— MedallionV283
11:38 am August 3rd, 2008

I agree, DG. Musial was the greatest, Gibby the best competitor and Raja was the most balanced in a tough era.

— Lee in Hazelwood
11:51 am August 3rd, 2008

Wheres the love for Lou? Stan, Bob, and Lou. Brocks base burglars, Brock’s 3000 hit club, Brockabrellas, this guy was Mr. Cardinal for 2 decades along with Gibby.

— Craig
11:54 am August 3rd, 2008

1.Gibson 2.Pujols 3.Musial

— mm61533
12:05 pm August 3rd, 2008

I completely agree on the top two picks…. I would have to say that I am not too familiar with Hornsby, perhaps a P-D columnist can expand on this subject with a feature on him. My #3 would be Lou Brock. He was such a impact player in 1964 (and again in ‘67 & ‘68, though overshadowed by Cepeda and Gibson in those years) that the Cardinals would have not won the World Championship without him. Of course, it helped that Ken Boyer carried the team in the first half and was the NL MVP that season too. Despite the individual accomplishments, the intrinsic beauty of baseball is that it is a ultimate team sport. It is very interesting that when players sacrifice their stats for the sake of only winning, what an effect it has on a baseball team.

— joe
12:11 pm August 3rd, 2008

I don’t understand how Ozzie cracks the top three. Fantastic defense is a given. But so so on offense by comparison. Brock and Pujols are above Ozzie.

I’ve got a better questions for you, All Time starting lineup:

Brock (CF), Hornsby (2B), Pujols (1B, Musial (LF), Medwick (RF), Simmons(C), Boyer (3B), Smith (SS), Gibson (P)

— RCJ
12:33 pm August 3rd, 2008

Here is a brief quote from “Wikipedia” that will shed some light on Rogers Hornsby’s career. This brief speaks volumes of his deserving standing for the top three.

“Until Barry Bonds reached the peak of his career in 2001, Hornsby was without a serious rival as the best hitter in the history of the National League. He is the only player to win the National League Triple Crown twice. His career batting average of .358 is the highest in National League history, and also the highest in major league history for any right-handed hitter. His batting average for the 1924 season was .424, a mark that no player since has matched. The Baseball Hall of Fame elected Hornsby in 1942. He has also been given a star on the St. Louis Walk of Fame”.

— drelboc
12:36 pm August 3rd, 2008

Is this survey only for people over 65? Believe it or not, there are Cardinals fans that are younger than that. To me, Rogers Hornsby, Stan Musial, Enos Slaughter and Dizzy dean, are about as remote as Andrew Jackson, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, and Copernicus.

— Tony
12:55 pm August 3rd, 2008

Lou Brock is a HOFer and an all-time great Cardinal. But there is no way in Hades that he can make the top three list, and certainly not ahead of Hornsby. The Rajah led the NL in batting six times in 11 full seasons in St. Louis. (He won another batting crown in 1928, after leaving the Cardinals.)

— Fuhrig
1:07 pm August 3rd, 2008

1 Gibson-Power
2 Brock-Speed
3 Ozzie-Grace

— MR
1:28 pm August 3rd, 2008

I guess Tonys list of smartest people ever would only include the guy that invented viagra, the guy that won so many times on Jeopardy, and the guy that invented compact discs.

He also probably lists Justin Timberlake, Snoop Dogg and Kelly Clarkson as the best “musicians” ever.

As a note Tony, I’m 28 and would argue long for the Rajah. If you’re going to appreciate baseball then you have to know its history. Otherwise you’re just another ignorant baseball fan, like Cub fans.

— RCJ
1:29 pm August 3rd, 2008

I am impressed, and can only say I agree with one-three.

Add a fourth, Lew Brock, maybe Albert Pujols for a fifth maybe fourth. But then he is a career still in the making…I mean so is Chris Carpenter such a career.

But, for sure…a quality post, with three top quality selections

— w s eddy
1:43 pm August 3rd, 2008

According to career OPS:

Pujols
Hornsby
Musial

— sdiver23
1:53 pm August 3rd, 2008

If El Hombre does not count since he is still playing these are my picks.

1. Stan
2. Bob Gibson
3. Red

— juice
1:54 pm August 3rd, 2008

I don’t think an every 4th/5th day player can be in your top three all time (And Dizzy was as good as Gibby anyway), so mine are:

1. Musial
2. Hornsby
3. Brock

(With Albert moving up fast)

— ptd
2:27 pm August 3rd, 2008

My votes go to Musial, Gibson and Pujols. Or possibly Musial, Gibson and Hornsby. Or Musial, Gibson and Cardinal Richeleux (sp?).
How about the three greatest Pirates? I guess Clemente, Wagner and Stargell. Or Clemente, Wagner and Traynor. Or Clemente, Wagner and Jean LaFitte.
As you can see, it’s easier to name two rather than three.
Yankees? Ruth, Gehrig and Mantle. Mantle, Maris and Whitey Ford. Ruth, Gehrig and Abe Lincoln.
Mets? Gotta be Seaver, Staub and Gooden, with a bow to Beverly Sills.
And for the bonus round —
Royals? Brett, White and Saberhagen. Or Brett, White and Princess Diana.
Rays? Boggs, Evan Longoria and whoever that good starter is they’ve got now. Also Ray Bolger.

— Bob Kelly
3:06 pm August 3rd, 2008

Commish,

I whole-heartedly agree with your three selections and you also got them in the correct order. There may be a day when Albert Pujols may join the company of these three gentlemen and super-stars, but he is not yet in their class as of yet.

— Thom Schamberger
3:10 pm August 3rd, 2008

I only disagree with the order.
1.) Musial
2.) Hornsby
3.) Gibson

I wanted to include Brock and Pujols may find himself on the list one day soon, but the top 3 are gold for now.

— b_hern39
3:14 pm August 3rd, 2008

I agree..

Musial…
Gibson…
Hornsby

— Gary Clouser
4:23 pm August 3rd, 2008

1. Gibson
2. Musial
3. Smith
If there were a fourth place, it would be Hornsby

— Jerry Finney
4:42 pm August 3rd, 2008

1. Musial
2. Gibson
3. Dean/Pujols — Dean is clearly the best/most famous from a spectacular era of Cardinal baseball that is largely overlooked by this generation, though without the Gas House gang, Cardinal baseball doesn’t nearly the tradition that it currently enjoys. Pujols is clearly the best of this era.

— jymmyz
4:44 pm August 3rd, 2008

I agree too: Musial, Gibson, Hornsby

— john gustafson
4:50 pm August 3rd, 2008

1. Musial
2. Gibson
3. Pujols

— jerky
5:10 pm August 3rd, 2008

1) Musial
2) Gibson
3) Brock

— Kevin
5:28 pm August 3rd, 2008

1. Musial
2. Brock
3. Gibson

I cannot judge prior to 1958. I saw my first Cardinal game at age 7. Hornsby et al can all be honorable mention, I guess.

— Pat S
5:32 pm August 3rd, 2008

1. Stan the Man

2. Gibson

3. El Hombre

— emc2013
5:38 pm August 3rd, 2008

1. Musial
2. Gibson
3. Hornsby

As good as Albert will be when it is all said and done, he ain’t done yet.

— Brad "Doc" Beckwith
5:54 pm August 3rd, 2008

1. Musial
2. Gibson
3. Schoendienst

I’ll throw in a vote for Red in the top three based on his overall accomplishments as a player, coach and manager for a half century! But I expect it will be Hornsby - a can’t-lose scenario.

— chillicards
6:11 pm August 3rd, 2008

Pujols, Hornsby, Gibson. All due respect to Mr. Stan.

— Sunil
7:43 pm August 3rd, 2008

My top 3 are:

1. Musial

2. Hornsby

3. Gibson

— Bruce Moon
8:24 pm August 3rd, 2008

Musial Gibson Hornsby

Great Time watching as young kid Gibson, Brock and Bill White

— psjamiller1990@att.net
8:27 pm August 3rd, 2008

1. Stan Musial
2. Bob Gibson
3. Albert Pujols
4. Ozzie Smith
5. Lou Brock

— Nick Danneberger
8:38 pm August 3rd, 2008

1. Willie McGee

2. Albert Pujols

3. Ted Simmons

— Sean
9:18 pm August 3rd, 2008

Royals???

1. Don Denkinger
2. Don Denkinger
3. Don Denkinger

— Sean
9:26 pm August 3rd, 2008

Can’t argue with the picks or the order.
1. Stan
2. Gibby
3. Hornsby
Lou would be fourth and Boyer fifth.
Ozzie was a nice player and a great SS I loved watching, but in my eyes is over-loved in STL and I wouldn’t have put him in the HOF or even consider him for this list.

— Doodahday
10:55 pm August 3rd, 2008

When I read the headline, I made two quick decisions, then came time for the third name. After the strange feeling of not including Ozzie Smith, Brock, and the others, Hornsby was the obvious choice.

While any of the retired numbered players could make the list, isn’t it great that the Cardinals have such a strong history that the choices are difficult because so many past players were at such a high level?

— sccworlds
12:05 am August 4th, 2008

1. Musial
2. Pujols
3. Hornsby

Gibson and Ozzie would be tied for fourth. I stumbled onto ‘60 Minutes’ last night and they interviewed statistical guru Bill James, who stated that Albert is the best player in the game today.

Quite frankly, I’m surprised that Hornsby’s feats are well-known enough in the Cardinals blogosphere to have him included by so many people. Often, I feel people’s knowledge of history only begins the year they were born…and I doubt most bloggers are ninety years old (!)

— John C
4:48 am August 4th, 2008

Stan “The Man” Musial is number 1, Rogers Hornsby is 2, Albert Pujols is 3 on my list.

— Peter Brown
5:48 am August 4th, 2008

By the way I voted “Three Finger” Brown as number 1 for the Cubs on ESPN, because he is the only one on the list to have ever worn a Cub uniform for a World Series Championship, all be it a 100 years ago.

— Peter Brown
5:51 am August 4th, 2008

Based on Star Power.

1. Gibby
2. Ozzie
3. Big Mac

Based on the best!

1. Stan the Man
2. Gibby
3. Ozzie

— Ryan
7:28 am August 4th, 2008

Sorry all, Brock was great, but he wasn’t half the player Albert is. Hornsby is a tough omission, but Albert is that good.

1. Musial
2. Pujols
3. Gibson

— Bert
7:34 am August 4th, 2008

You have it right. Albert may one day be on the list, but Musial, Gibson and Hornsby cannot be challenged at this point in time.

— Thom
7:51 am August 4th, 2008

1. Stan
2. Bobby
3. Rogers
Lou, Albert, OZ

Minneapolis Redbird Crew

— RIG
8:00 am August 4th, 2008

Stan
Gibby
Ozzie

Albert is climbing the ranks though.

— Joel Carboni
8:20 am August 4th, 2008

1. Musial, 2. Pujols, 3. Gibson.
Anyone that does not include Musial cannot possibly know anything about Cardinal baseball or baseball period for that matter. He is not only the best Cardinal ever, but one of the 5 best players ever. If he would have played in New York he would be remembered as the best player to ever step on the field.

— Chuck Fairbanks
8:53 am August 4th, 2008

Musial
Gibson
McGwire

— Nancy Schierding
8:56 am August 4th, 2008

Showing my age I have to go for Musial Hornsby and Gibson. If ’Big Albert continues his performance level for the remainder of his career, it would be a real tough call on who would comprise the top three.

— gary meade
9:13 am August 4th, 2008

My three picks would be:

1. Musial
2. Gibson
3. Schoendienst
with Lou Brock a close fourth.

— Phil Franke
9:17 am August 4th, 2008

1) Mulder
2) Clemente
3) Chris Duncan

Because if these players would have been healthy. We be in the playoff.

Just kidding. :)

— John Mozeliak
10:19 am August 4th, 2008

I agree with Phil

“1. Musial
2. Gibson
3. Schoendienst
with Lou Brock a close fourth.”

— John Mozeliak
10:23 am August 4th, 2008

Musial and Gibson for sure. The third one is tough, it could be Albert. I would put Hornsby or Medwick before Ozzie. This drill makes you remember all the great players that we had the pleasure of seeing over the years.

— scals
10:30 am August 4th, 2008

1. Musial
2. Gibson
3. Hornsby

I believe in Albert remains in the bat and birds for another 5 years and continues his current hitting dominance, he will easily supplant Hornsby in this list. Ozzie just doesn’t quite have enough juice, although he and Gibson each revolutionized the game in their own way.

— kez
10:34 am August 4th, 2008

I’m a little surprised that Dizzy Dean hasn’t gotten more mention, but I completely understand where the Mozart reference comes from. Sure, there are fans younger than 65. Heck, I imagine Cardinals eNation is a majority of fans age tween to baby boom, with most probably right around my age.

That said, I never shared a year with JFK, Martin Luther King or Ernest Hemingway or F. Scott Fitzgerald or, heck, Chaucer, but I can appreciate them. Mozart’s music may be from another time, but it is timeless. Same with historically significant leaders or supreme writers … and exceptional baseball players.

I may not have seen Hornsby play. Heck, my grandfather only read about the second baseman for the Cardinals. But there’s reason we know his name.

Just like we still know Mozart’s music.

Or Chaucer’s tales.

dg
-30-

— Derrick Goold
10:54 am August 4th, 2008

Gibson,Brock,Musial (Pujols will make the list when he is finished playing)

— Kate
11:06 am August 4th, 2008

I completely agree with your selections, they are mine as well

1. Stan Musial

2. Bob Gibson

3. Rogers Hornsby

— bstory
11:13 am August 4th, 2008

I agree with BG’s selection, and in the same order. Pujols is worthy of consideration, but needs more years of the same productivity.

— Ed Schwab
11:13 am August 4th, 2008

I agree –

Musial
Gibson
Hornsby

A modern 3 –

Brock
Ozzie
Flood

Sorry, Albert does not qualify as great yet

— DL
11:56 am August 4th, 2008

I’d agree with GForce (for the future). It’s an exciting time for Cardinals fans. How many more years of doing his thing will it take Albert to become a no-brainer selection for the Cards’ top 3? For so long, Stan Musial was (and still is) without question the greatest of all Cardinals. I think, though that the time will come eventually when El Hombre makes us think twice.

My 3 (for now)
1. Musial
2. Gibson
3. Schoendienst (Player & Manager)

— Bill
12:15 pm August 4th, 2008

I have to agree with you on your choices. I can see folks wanting to add Ozzie and Albert but how do you displace any of these three.. you can’t. There are so many true stars that have come through the ranks of the St. Louis Cardinals that I can see it being difficult and no matter what you think of him you have to add MaGwire to the list. I’m still of the thought that the three you put up are were they should be

— ShamrockJim
12:23 pm August 4th, 2008

1 - Dizzy Dean 2 - Mark McGwire 3 - Pepper Martin

— tommy r
12:57 pm August 4th, 2008

1 McGwire 2 Dean 3 Brock

— jesus perez
1:07 pm August 4th, 2008

I think Albert HAS to be included in the top three - equal to Gibson.

Obviously, he’s still active and he’s played less than eight years, but I think even his first 7 1/2 years in the bigs would put him on the list. EVERY single year of his career has been an MVP caliber performance. Musial, of course, displayed that same ability from the beginning through the late ’50’s; in other words, Albert’s career - times two…(!)

Gibson (along with Koufax, Marichal, Drysdale) was a dominant pitcher of his generation, and the Cardinals’ best, but he didn’t become a successful pitcher until 1963 and tapered off after 1970. He, of course, was a powerhouse during those years with 1968 being the BEST performance by ANY pitcher in the 20th Century. Yet, his won/lost record after 1970 was 61-57 and his era hovered around 3.40 - good, but certainly not spectacular.

So, I’ll put Albert’s first 7.5 years against Gibson’s 7.5 year run from 1963 through 1970 (Gibby was injured for 1/2 of 1967).

1. Stan-The-Man
2. The Rajah
3. Phat Albert or Hoot Gibson (toss-up)

— John C
1:11 pm August 4th, 2008

McGwire? Seriously? On lists that didn’t include Pujols … please explain. Though, McGwire did help build the Cardinals of the 2000s by walking away from a salary the Cardinals then used elsewhere.

— Derrick Goold
1:17 pm August 4th, 2008

HORNSBY WAS THE GREATEST HITTER IN CARDINAL HISTORY.
SO ITS:
MUSIAL
HORNSBY
GIBSON

— PAUL B
1:21 pm August 4th, 2008

You have to go with the late 90s outfield:
1. Brian Jordan
2. Ron Gant
3. Ray Lankford

— gocards
2:26 pm August 4th, 2008

I nominate:
1. Stan The Man Musial (The Number One Cardinal of all time)
2. Bob Gibson (One of the toughest pitchers ever)
3. Rogers Hornsby ( Never saw him, but my dad told me a lot about him)

— prestanfan
2:42 pm August 4th, 2008

Wonder why Mark Mcquire hasn’t been mentioned? People shure do hold a grudge for a long time.

— chester
2:56 pm August 4th, 2008

1.) Musial (Top ten player of all time)
2.) Hornsby (Greatest 2b of all time)
3.) Ozzie ( Greatest defensive player of all time)

— Steve
3:00 pm August 4th, 2008

Now…who are the three in the OTHER direction?

1. Juan Agosto
2. Al Santorini
3. Jeff Brantley

— John C
3:16 pm August 4th, 2008

Top 3 Cardinals

1. Stan-he is Mr. Cardinal
2. Gibby-I will argue til the day I die that Bob Gibson is the best right-handed pitcher in baseball’s modern era
3. Ozzie-The Wizard was probably the greatest defensive shortstop of all time

— Mike
3:19 pm August 4th, 2008

I still like Mark McGuire. I like Albert Pujols. I like Lou Brock.

— honabe
3:19 pm August 4th, 2008

Pujols??? No doubt that if he keeps on his current pace he’ll be an all-time Cardinal great and an all-time MLB great too. Of course that is also assuming he remains a Redbird for a large part of his career. This is an all-time list, not a “he’s gonna be an all-timer some day in the future” list. The top 3 have to be:

1. Musial
2. Gibson
3. Brock (with Hornsby a close 4th.)

Hey maybe we should put Jim Edmonds on this list, oh wait he’s a Cub so now we can’t even acknowledge how great and valuable he was in St. Louis, right Bernie? Dopey Cardinal “Nation”.

— FirstPlaceCubs
4:03 pm August 4th, 2008

1) Musial
2) Gibson
3) Pujols

— MaryAnnT
4:08 pm August 4th, 2008

Musial
Schoendienst
Gibson
Ken Boyer
Lou Brock
Rogers Hornsby

The list could go on and on but with “the Captain” at 3rd Base, Gibby on the mound and Lou on base there could be a definite tie for third place. With Hornsby the stories I have been told about his greatness we could have a forth member of the third place voting. I appreciate what Albert has been doing over his career but he just doesn’t hit the top three list just yet he is close. I think that this could lead to some interesting arguments, especially with the die-heart Cardinal fans in St. Louis. We forgot Enos with his mad dash. So let’s just say every one in Cardinal Nation will have their own top three.

— Jim Sanders
4:14 pm August 4th, 2008

Folks, Pujols doesn’t qualify yet. I’ve seen Pujols. I’ve met him before. I’ve talked to him before. He’s a good guy and a fantastic player but The Cardinals have a very long and storied history that has numerous legendary players through out that history. When and if Pujols reaches the status of a legend then I could see an arguement for including him but that hasn’t happened yet.

Admittedly being a baby boomer I have a tendancy to gravitate towards such players as Musial, Gibson and Brock. Stan the man was a fantastic player who was a huge contributer to too many world series wins to not be on the list. Gibson, besides from being on two world series winners, was a pitcher that was feared through out the league during his era. He dominated his position and was the best at it. Brock, same world series issues as well as being a fantastic outfielder and the quintisential stolen base king. He revolutionized stealing bases and was the picture of the 1960’s Cardinal teams that were built for speed. The Busch stadium of old was huge before they moved in the walls and the Cardinals dominated that stadium through their use of speed.

Pujols is a great player, a fantastic slugger, and a driving force with the team but do you think his defensive play at first base yet qualifies him as the best first baseman in the league? Each of the players I listed were often listed as the best at their position. Before I would consider Pujols, I’d place Ozzie in the top three. The 70’s were lost years for the cardinals. Ozzie was a huge part in reviving the team and giving us the exciting play of the 80’s Cardinals. Pujols is well on his way to getting there but he’s not there yet.

— Mark
4:18 pm August 4th, 2008

This is just an “if” and a “hopefully”. In this order.

1. Pujols
2. Musial
3. Gibson

“If” El Hombre makes it 20 healthy years in a Redbird uniform, imagine what his all time numbers will look like.

Average .330+
Homers 700-800
RBI’s 2000-2500
Runs 2000ish
Slugging % .600+
OPB .450+
Gold Gloves & MVP’s hopefully 5+ each
Worlds Series Hopefully over 1

As great a storied tradion as the Cardinals have had, these numbers would rank at the top, and near the top of the all time greats of the game. Let’s hope we see this happen and hope The Man also sees this happen. We really have something special in this guy. Albert and A-Rod are easily the top 2 in baseball right now.

BTW Who did ESPN pick as their top 3?

— Reap
4:50 pm August 4th, 2008

1. Musial
2. Brock
3. Gibson

— wubie
7:32 pm August 4th, 2008

Ozzie Smith (my idol)
Bob Gibson
Dizzy Dean

— Boone
7:40 pm August 4th, 2008

No man was prouder to be a Cardinal or a greater competitor than Enos “Country” Slaughter. I’d want him on my team and I’d bet that my boyhood idol Stan Musial would too!

— Jim Frisina
9:28 pm August 4th, 2008

Pujols over Hornsby assuming he remains a career Cardinal as were Musial and Gibson, but not Hornsby. Otherwise Brock I think. He and Gibson highlighted the Cards of the 60s. Hard to leave Ozzie out.

— Bill Rogers
10:45 pm August 4th, 2008

I concur, Hornsby, Musial and Gibby are impossible to argue with as the top three in Cards history. That only begs the question of batting order. I say, on basebal merits alone, Hornsby, Musial and then Gibby(though that’s a bit unfair comparing a pitcher to field players).

Stan Musial is in a stratosphere all by himself, simply because he may be one of the truly finest gentlemen that has ever graced the planet, much less a Cards uniform. He is the best case I can think of for cloning.

Pretty good chance Albert will nudge one of those three out as he reaches - and then shatters - various milestones and Cards records. Another World Series championship or two would cinch his place in the pantheon of Redbird gods.

I hate to mention the guys above without at least a tip-of-the-cap to Joe Medwick, Kenny Boyer, Dizzy Dean, Ozzie Smith and, particularly, Lou Brock. Not in the top three, or even top ten, is a sentimental favorite, Bob Forsch, who just flat made himself dependable starting pitcher and could swing the bat remarkably well.

Of course those names bring even more to mind. How about a nod to two other guys associated with the Cards. Harry Caray and Jack Buck could make even the dullest game sound like the 7th game of the World Series. Not many like those two come around, especially in these days of mochachino mass media sports extravaganzas and pretty boy talking heads who are not, at heart, artists who paint larger-than-life pictures one well-placed word at a time.

— Monroe
10:48 pm August 4th, 2008

1. Gibson
2. Musial
3. Hornsby

— doffner
4:15 am August 5th, 2008

Lou Brock
Albert Pujols
Stan )The Man) Musial

— Danny Cartner
6:56 am August 5th, 2008

Just to be different…

Musial
Hornsby
Dean

Mostly because I don’t think Diz is getting the attention he deserves. :)
Dizzy’s career ERA: 3.02 — Gibby: 2.91
Dizzy’s SO/BB ratio: 2.57:1 — Gibby: 2.33:1
1 MVP each
They didn’t have Gold Gloves back then. Tough call, but I gotta go with Diz…

— Don
8:12 am August 5th, 2008

I agree whole-heartedly. Those are the 3 that came immediately to mind. Of course, it might be that it’s because I can remember all three. I’m proud to cheer on a club with so many “superstars” in its history!
Ebbysmom

— Debby Eichenberger
9:01 am August 5th, 2008

1. Mark McGwire
2. Mark McGwire
3. Mark McGwire

— Don Mays
12:52 pm August 5th, 2008

Agree on Dean, Slaughter and several others from the 30’s-50’s. Never saw them play but heard many stories from my Dad. Just watching the old film clips shows their desire and dedication to the game. Watching some of the current Cardinal ”stars” make you wonder.

— DL
1:06 pm August 5th, 2008

Top Three

1. Stan the Man
2. Bob Gibson
3. Ozzie Smith

Ozzie defined the Cards in the 80’s and was the face of that franchise. Who doesn’t know the flip and that silky smooth glove? Go crazy folks, go crazy!

— Ross
1:51 pm August 5th, 2008

Good call! Musial and Gibson are #1 and #2. Hornsby, Pujols, Schoendienst, Brock, Ozzie Smith, Slaughter would all be qualified as #3.

— Roger Myers
5:08 pm August 5th, 2008

Ozzie, Willie McGee, Vince Coleman.

— Cardguy
12:13 am August 6th, 2008

I really don’t understand the Ozzie love fest by some folks. He was a really fun player to watch who benefited from playing during one of the most exciting periods of Cardinal baseball. However, to win a game on any given day, I would prefer the combination of offensive AND defensive performance Edgar Rentaria displayed during his time in STL. Edgars crime was in leaving, but is that worse than the “all about me” way that Ozzie bowed out.
Alot of great Cards over the years.
Non better than the three listed:
Stan, Gibson, Hornsby…In a few years we can make our own Mt. Rushmore by adding Albert!

— Doodahday
6:59 am August 6th, 2008

Hornsby became a Cub later, inexcusable and it prevents him from this list. Gotta move Albert up there. Brock, Edmonds and Lynn McGlothen are eliminated for the same reasons.

Musial, Gibby and Albert.

— Michael Martin
10:39 am August 6th, 2008

1. Musial 2. Slaughter 3. Pujols

A cardinal fan since 1946

— Daniel Sarko
11:23 am August 6th, 2008

anyone who doesn’t see why Hornsby belongs in the top 3 has no sense of history. How about some perspective here. Look up his stats - he might be the best right-handed hitter of all-time. Two triple crowns, folks!

Top three:

1) Musial
2) Hornsby
3) Gibson

— Johnny One-tyme
1:25 pm August 6th, 2008

1.Stan Musial(Stan “The Man” One of the best ever. For any team.)

2.Bob Gipson(Filthy,Nasty,Winner,& Intimidating come to mind. With a little more run support they may have called the Cy Young award the Bob Gipson award.)

3.Albert Pujols (I think Albert will be #1 on this list when he is done. Albert is on pace to being one of the top ten players of all-time, maybe top five.)

— Tim
3:21 pm August 6th, 2008

Jim Bottomley

Joe Medwick

Stan the Man

— Al Polis
4:12 pm August 6th, 2008

Orlando Cepeda is my #1 star. Have to put Hornsby next [admit that Hornsby was better, but he's at least in my top three]. Gibson is probably the better pitcher [although you have to give Cooper and Brecheen a nod, maybe Tudor, and now Carpenter], but Dean was probably a bigger star, so I’ll go with Dean for #3.

— Bill
5:19 pm August 6th, 2008

I agree DG. In fact even before reading the article I had them as my top 3. However, as I was growing up Ozzie was who I idolized, being a SS myself in Little League and high school. There was no one else I enjoyed watching play more than “The Wizard.” I wish I had the honor and pleasure to see Stan, Gibby and Rajah play. So, it’s very difficult for me to leave Ozzie off the list. As for Albert, he’s who I enjoy watching these days, so it’s equally hard for me to leave him off. Just imagine, Albert has time to collect more batting titles, HR titles, RBI titles, Gold Gloves, MVPs and rings. Where will he fall in 10 years? He could take over the top spot even. And I hope he does, due to his ring collection. The fact of the matter is, that all these guys we’ve named are and were tremendous players and without a doubt some of the best that ever played.
>Cardinal fan in TX<

— David
8:24 pm August 6th, 2008

“Too early to tell about Albert”
????????????????????????????????
I feel sorry for you Robert. You have either been in a como or your head has been lodged somewhere for the last 8 years!

Are you still waiting for the sophomore slump?

— THO
10:33 pm August 6th, 2008

DG: Can’t fault your three. My hope is that Albert makes it a career with the Cardinals. In three years, he bumps Rajah from the list. Gibby was from my (boyhood) era– so he’ll always belong there for me. Stan is simply “the Man.”

— Allen
9:28 am August 7th, 2008

I’d put Wally Moon as no. one, Joe Cunningham as no.2, for those great stretches alone, and Don Blasingame as no. 3. He really knew how to “manufacture” runs.

— Hutch
10:35 am August 7th, 2008

It’s between Pujols and Lou Brock. Lou really impacted the games he played. Albert is going to be the best with a few more years, but Lou already did it. Every time he got on base, the game was controlled by him. I sure enjoyed listening to him play. He put Carey and Buck in the hall of fame. Just my opinion, but I loved it.

— Jim
12:18 pm August 7th, 2008

My only comment would be………….name three that are better than the three you have chosen………two prolific hitters and one of the most dominant pitchers of all tiime………..are we witnessing the second coming of Stan………Ankiel seems real enough to believe he can be

— old school
12:41 pm August 7th, 2008

agree 100%

After pujols has retired though, i believe he will be on that list.

— cardinals15edmonds
1:09 pm August 7th, 2008

Charlie “Machine Man” Lefton is the best. Probably second would be Barry “Four Eyes” Needle, followed by Donny “the Don” Makovsky.

— morris shenker
11:58 pm August 7th, 2008

1 Bobby Del Greco 2 Probably a tie here between Willard Schmidt and Vinegar Bend Mizell. I guess I’ll go with old unassuming Willard, although Mizell was a bigger name. 3 Same problem here as for 2. Either Del Ennis, Eddie Kasko (”the Vacuum Cleaner”, per Harry Caray) or Lonnie Smith. I like Del, but I’ll choose Lonnie, the heart of the 82 World Series champs.

— Menachem Goldman
11:51 am August 8th, 2008

Make mine

1. Musial
2. Gibson
3. Smith

Albert still has to prove it and Hornsby was way before my time.

— milehighcardsfan
3:18 pm August 8th, 2008

When rating the all-time best, one has to choose everyday position players even though I think Gibby was the greatest pitcher of his era and one of the greatest of all time. My choices are Stan the Man, Pujols and Hornsby. Certainly, the Wizard and Brock were great players who changed the game as did Gibson but I have to stick with my three even though Albert’s career has been shorter than the others.

— cdrhagan
10:37 am August 11th, 2008