Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
08.15.2008 2:48 am

Wainwright’s best role — Closer? or Starter?

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

FORT LAUDERDALE — The Cardinals’ reluctance to “anoint” Chris Perez as closer seems downright quaint compared to the seesaw Adam Wainwright is riding as he prepares this weekend for his third, and possibly last, rehab appearance.

To start, or not to start, that is the question.

Whether ’tis nobler in the ninth to close and take up an arm against a sea of troubles or … Oh, I’ll stop there before the allusion goes too far afield. But this is the quandary that will preoccupy the Cardinals in the coming days. On Saturday, Wainwright will throw 65-70 pitches for Class AA Springfield. He has already had his rehab program altered twice to react to the Cardinals’ latest plan — to prepare him for either a late-inning relief role (read: closer) or a spot in the rotation. The decision somewhat rests on Chris Carpenter’s health. The decision somewhat rests on Chris Perez’s success. The decision more than somewhat rests on Wainwright’s readiness.

The decision tests where the Cardinals fit on a pitcher’s value spectrum:

QUANTITY OF INNINGS

vs.

GRAVITY OF INNINGS

The Cardinals sent Wainwright off on his rehab assignment last weekend with the instructions that he was being “groomed” as a reliever. He was going to have short outings every few days and be ready to join the bullpen as early as this weekend.

That changed when Carpenter’s, ahem, posterior shoulder barked.

The guiding principle for the Cardinals now is need. If Wainwright is needed as a starter, then he will be ready to start. If Wainwright is needed to pin-down leads in the late innings — as was the original plan — then he’ll be ready to hold.

The case for Wainwright being a starter has several pillars, including:

  • It’s his role, the one he prefers, the one he started the season doing.

  • It allows him to make the largest impact on the team, when weighed in total innings.

  • Perez, et. al., are doing quite fine as closer and committee, thank you.

  • Having Wainwright, Carpenter, Kyle Lohse/Todd Wellemeyer/Braden Looper/Joel Pineiro as a rotation gives the Cardinals the horsepower to contend and possible stun in a playoff series.

The case for Wainwright being the late-inning reliever (read: closer) also some obvious and compelling arguments, including:

  • He could be back in the majors earlier as a reliever.

  • He won’t pitch as many innings, but the importance of the innings he will pitch are magnified because a good outing by him means a win; a good outing by him as a starter with a jumbled, erratic bullpen won’t always mean a win.

  • Wainwright is weather-tested in the role.

  • The need for a starter isn’t as glaring as the need for a reliever because of the recent run by pitchers like Looper (five cons. superb outings) and Wellemeyer (sharp vs. Cubs and Marlins). Throw in Pineiro and that trio pitched 21 2/3 innings this week against the Marlins and allowed two earned runs. All went at least seven innings.

All things being equal, it’s likely a team would side with using a pitcher who can be a frontline starter as a starter. As one baseball official said, a team would also consider the pitcher’s peak potential — great closer? good starter? good closer? great closer? The contract the Cardinals offered Wainwright answers that question.

Things are not equal, so the Cardinals are likely to side with, as mentioned above, need.

If Wainwright throws well Saturday and, say, the Cardinals move him immediately into the rotation, he would have time for about eight starts this season. If he goes five innings in his first start but counterbalances that with a couple eight-inning starts, he can probably average six, seven innings and throw 48 to 56 innings. Assuming Wainwright  is healthy, it’s safe to say he will also be effective.

From the 2007 All-Star break through June 7 this season — the day his finger popped – Wainwright was in elite company.

Of the 39 pitchers in the majors to throw at least 163 innings in that span, Wainwright was one of five who had an ERA lower than 3.00. Three of the other pitchers in this group have won a Cy Young Award:

  1. Brandon Webb, AZ … 2.57 ERA … 196 ip

  2. Adam Wainwright, STL … 2.92 ERA … 191 1/3 ip

  3. Jake Peavy, SD … 2.93 ERA … 163 ip

  4. Tim Hudson, ATL … 2.97 ERA … 193 2/3  

  5. Roy Halladay, TOR … 2.98 ERA … 211 1/3 ip

As a closer, Wainwright has as many regular-season saves as … Perez. That’s right: three. Wainwright’s resume — “track record,” as manager Tony La Russa calls it — comes from the postseason. In describing some of the reasons why the worst thing for Perez is for the team to “anoint” him closer, La Russa said it’s because he hasn’t done some of the things closer have to do. Wainwright had the preferred build up. He got placed in jams, got into jams and pitched out of jams before inheriting the ninth inning for the playoffs.

In October ‘06, Wainwright got four saves, closed out all three series clincher, and he did not allow a run in 9 2/3 innings.

The same assignment for the rest of this season would be based on the Cardinals’ wish to earmark one pitcher for the ninth inning and maximize the number of appearances (if not innings) in pivotal situations for Wainwright. The performance of the other starters also tilts the pitcher’s value spectrum toward relief. A few weeks ago the best way to use Wainwright might have yielded a different answer.

The timing would have been different. The need would have been different.

Case closed? What’s your call?

-30-

40 comments

Comments are closed.

STARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTERSTARTER!!

Total waste of resources to put Wainwright in the bullpen.

— Nick
9:33 am August 15th, 2008

I would re-frame this a bit and think about it this way: are you better off substituting Wainwright for Piniero in the rotation or Wainwright for Perez in save situations (I know you would technically be moving the last right hand reliever off the roster (Thompson? Izzy???)but the real impact is the difference in high leverage save situation performance).

I think your argument is that recent improved performance by Looper, Welley and Piniero reduces the “need” for AW in that role. However, the only one that matters is the guy he would replace (5th guy assuming we stick w/ a 5 man rotation) and I hope we’ve learned by now not to rely on very small sample sizes to judge Piniero’s performance (see his albatross contract for illumination). Clearly, AW should give us a significantly better chance to win those 8 remaining starts. How many more we should expect to win is a complicated question…I’ll say 2-3 (say, 70% win rate for AW and 40% for JP).

Would he be likely to add more than 2-3 wins over CP as your closer? We have 38 games left. A dedicated, durable closer on a winning team might have, say, 16 save opps over the this span (42% of games played, which is a K-Rod’s % for a very winning team–none of this matters if the Card’s can’t put up save opportunities at a high rate). Let’s say AW is K-Rod (90% save conversion rate) and CP is just a tad better than Franklin (say 75% compared to RF’s 67%). I don’t think AW would be this good or CP this bad (my belief is that CP would be at least as good as AW), but let’s assume some extremes to make the point. This 15% difference in save conversion would result in about 1-2 more wins (2 blown saves but these don’t equal losses).

I realize a proper analysis would be much more complicated (and include factors such as impact on overall bullpen performance from lighter load from AW’s higher average innings per start) but this is a start…

— molon labe
9:47 am August 15th, 2008

When Adam comes back he should resume his #1 starter role. He is our best pitcher right now. If they do anything with him other than start then someone in the front office should lose their job. It’s a no brainer.

— John
10:27 am August 15th, 2008

agreed - wainwright has proven his effectiveness in pressure packed situations. since izzy can’t go, waino is the only pitcher on staff with those kind of credentials. a HUGE part of a closer’s effectiveness is his reputation he brings to the mound. almost all mlb players remember his performance two years ago. it’s the same effect as the “big bat” behind pujlos. even though ludwick is having a better year than those big names, he doesn’t yet carry the reputation. alot of baseball is mental.

— roger from lake tahoe
10:36 am August 15th, 2008

mh,

Saw the curve in Memphis and it should be fine. He was able to locate it, and it reportedly had improved bite during his second appearance. While I understand the argument that a fastball/slider/cutter combition is plenty for a reliever, you also want your closer to have his best weapon because, unlike a starter, there’s no compensation, no setting hitters up, no grinding with what you got without trouble. Wainwright’s curve is a trump card in the ninth, maybe even more so than when he’s starting.

molon,

That is a good way to frame the argument. Don’t make the case for what’s best from Wainwright; look at how much of an upgrade he is over the player in that position. In other words, his value over his replacement.

Not sure it makes the decision any more clear, but that’s an excellent way to come to a decision.

dg

— Derrick Goold
10:55 am August 15th, 2008

He needs to be a starter, period. He was a reliever in his rookie year, 2006, becuase he was a rookie, and Izzy was awful. However, while Izzy is awful again, we didn’t have Chris Perez in 2006. I mean, tonight (August 15th), we have Brad Thompson going tonight against the reds. Can we say we Anthony Reyes anyone?

So yeah, Wainwright is a starter. And back to Izzy… he’s making $7.5 million this season; he should donate that to 100 needy families in the St. Louis area. That’s $75,000 per family. That would be 100 saves for Izzy, the easy way. When’s Izzy’s retirement party, cause I’m there!

— Daniel James
11:03 am August 15th, 2008

The way to strengthen the bullpen is to make Wainwright a Starter!

Sounds backwards, but what I have not heard talked about is the fact that as a starter, he could eat up a lot more innings than as a closer. Those innings reduce the load on the bullpen, making them stronger.

— Bruce Livingston
11:39 am August 15th, 2008

I’ve read all these comments and there are some very insightful ones to be sure, the best being the value over replacement approach. AW value over the any starter he might replace is greater than the value re represents over the potential closers. If we can also go to 4 man rotation in August the bullpen might also be significantly impacted by the addition of Welly or Loop (not both).

— b_hern39
11:55 am August 15th, 2008

If the Cardinals are trying to win a pennant, then Wainwright needs to be the closer to end this season since he’s actually building up innings right now anyway and not ready to pitch 7-9 innings he would be if middle of full season health. Perez can occasionally be available to close if Wainwright is needed too often. Perez can learn & prove pressure role in the 7th 8th or 9th. Since the Cardinal ownership didn’t improve 5th starter or another offensive player, I don’t think they expect to or care if the catch Milwaukee or not. So most of his is not about this year anyway

— Jon J
1:18 pm August 15th, 2008

Waino should start. Carp should close.

— texasredbird
1:31 pm August 15th, 2008

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 » Show All