Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
10.28.2008 12:43 am

Rain Reign? Why October Should Rule

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

TOWER GROVE — Baseball should thank Carlos Pena for rescuing the World Series from a faulty rule.

Sure the Series could end Tuesday night with a Philadelphia Phillies victory and it’s likely the Phillie that gets that tie-breaking hit won’t need to take a wallet when he goes out to eat on Broad Street. But no matter how many balls Ryan Howard pulps out of the ballpark in the rest of this Series, no matter how many singles B.J. Upton turns into doubles — or triples! — with his high-speed kleptomania, the biggest hit of the 2008 World Series came from Tampa Bay first baseman Pena.

With two outs in the top of the sixth inning.

In driving rain and dropping temperatures.

To save the game from going on.

It was quite clear as the rain intensified Monday at Citizens Bank Park that the game was going to continue until it was over or it was tied — because as commissioner Bud Selig told reporters later he wasn’t going to let the World Series end with a called game. “I would not have allowed a World Series to end this way,” Selig said. Yet, that was the situation facing the Phillies and Rays as they played through the slop. (Associated Press columnist Jim Litke has already chimed in.) Once they got through the top of the fifth inning, World Series Game 5 became an official game and there was the chance the rain would crown the Phillies.

That’s no way to win a World Series. That’s like tying an All-Star Game.

Oh, right …

Back in the winter of 2006, after the St. Louis Cardinals and Detroit had played in a rainy, slippy-slidey World Series (See: Curtis Granderson), Major League Baseball changed the rules on suspended games for the 2007 season and beyond. How Rule 4.12 (5) now reads:

Weather, if a regulation game is called while an inning is in progress and before the inning is completed, and the visiting team has scored one or more runs to take the lead, and the home team has not retaken the lead.

Had Game 5 been in the third inning or fourth inning or the like, the rain would have washed out whatever had happened so far and the game would, by rule, start over. Monday’s game drifted into the territory of “regulation game” once it got through 4 1/2 innings, even as the teams waded through the weather. And that triggered the above rule only because of Pena’s clutch RBI single. If the game is tied or the visiting team has just taken the lead without the home team having a chance to answer, then the game is considered “suspended” and will be picked up at a later date. (In this case, ASAP.)

The Rockwellian Rainout

The Rockwellian Rainout

When the weather clears, the World Series will continue in the bottom of the sixth.

If not for Pena’s single, they may have continued playing in that mess.

Selig’s comments after the game indicate that he and others were banking on the suspended game rule, were fingers crossed and hoping that the Rays would rally to tie or take the lead any … time … now … so that the game could be suspended instead of called. But why even have that worry? It’s the postseason. It’s the playoffs. Baseball is a game that is over after the visiting team has had nine innings at the plate, unless it is tied at the end of nine complete innings. The schedule and the grind of the regular season demands that a “regulation game” definition be in place. Sure after five innings a game in August is official. Swell. Move on. That April-rain game against the Pittsburgh Pirates that ended in sixth because of rain? Fine.

But come the playoffs, games should be played to their completion.

All of the game, every game. Until one team has 27 outs and the lead.

Weather, no matter how long-winded and grumpy, should not have a say. Not in the playoffs.

In hockey, there are rules in place to assure that a regular-season game ends as expediently as possible so that the team can get on the plane and play in Edmonton the next night. But come the postseason, those rules are rewritten. Games go until there is a victor. No 5-min overtime. No shootout. Just the game. Three overtimes — a whole other game of overtime — if needed. Why shouldn’t that be the rule in baseball? Why even risk having a World Series or a League Championship Series decided by a rain-shortened game that only goes five or six innings.

Write the rule to describe a “regulation playoff game” as one of at least 8 1/2 innings. Require that a game be played to its completion, even if delayed a day by rain — like Game 5. As baseball plays deeper and deeper into October (possibly November next year!), ugly weather becomes more of a player. The definitions of a “regulation game” should be modified to make sure a Series isn’t spoiled by a shortened game.

October rules. Rain shouldn’t.

***

With Cole Hamels’ second start suspended, care to take another stab at who should be MVP?

-30-

15 comments

Comments are closed.

Agreed… any weather postponement in the post-season should call for a suspended game. The weather forecast for Philly doesn’t look much better tonight; here’s hoping they get the (rest) of the game in!

— The Ol Goaler
8:20 am October 28th, 2008

That looks a lot like the rule that was in the books in the 1990s. However, if the home team completed their inning and retied the score, the game may have been ruled a tie in those days–not anymore. Consider Baltimore at the ChiSox from this past April. Baltimore scored in the rain in the 11th; the Sox tied it in their half. The inning was completed, but the game was still suspended. If it had been rained out, they could have made it up in Chicago on an off day. But since it was suspended, it had to be made up in Baltimore before the next scheduled game (no more games scheduled in Chicago). Baltimore won in the top of the 14th at Camden Yards in August.

Why can’t baseball play by their own rules? There is a rule in there stating that any ballpark completed, or modified inward, after June 1, 1958, must be at least 400 feet to centerfield and 330 feet down the lines (or 325?). Both parks in this series violate that rule on the left field line. I say the asterisk for Barry Bonds’s 73-homerun season should be based on the illegal ballpark he played in, without taking a position on the steroid enhancement.

This game also shows a problem with the lack of the DH rule. In the bottom of the 4th inning, in the rain, Cole Hamels had to run the bases, after bunting a pitch off his hands. He was running with the pitch at least 6 times I remember counting. If the game had continued, what effect would that have had on his pitching? (And should the Cardinals have walked Roger Clemens intentionally to make him run the bases in the NLCS?)

— Geoff [not Blum]
9:03 am October 28th, 2008

The DH is an abomination! The effect that running the bases would have on a pitcher is PART OF THE GAME - if he can’t deal with it, he shouldn’t be playing baseball!

— DH worst invention EVER
10:02 am October 28th, 2008

While they’re at it, change the first round to 7 games instead of 5 so that a wild-card team with 2 dominating pitchers won’t have the advantage over some division winners whose talent depth may be a little more spread out. Two more games can easily be fit into the same time frame, if they’re willing to compromise on having virtually every playoff game be prime time. After all, the trade-off is potentially two more playoff games in each 1st round series, right?

— steve
10:27 am October 28th, 2008

I don’t read anything in the portion of rule 4.12(5) cited that applies to last night’s game. Tampa Bay did not take the lead, they merely tied the game.

I do agree that postseason baseball games should be played in their entirity.

— DizzyDean17
10:28 am October 28th, 2008

I agree, DG. I’ll see your rule change and raise you: playoff games that are rained out at any point in the game should be resumed from the same point. For example, a game that is rained out after only 3 innings of play should be resumed in the top of the 4th rather than re-played from the top of the 1st. It’s annoying enough when actual performance is erased during the regular season but I don’t see a reason to do so in the playoffs. Thoughts?

— molon labe
11:38 am October 28th, 2008

The rule may need some tweaking now, but it is a heck of a lot better than what would have happened before 2007. As the rule worked then, the WS would be over right now with the Phillies winning Game 5 2-1. How is that possible you ask? Because, the old rule stated that if a game was longer than 5 innings, then the game was official and you took the score of the game from the last completed inning. Therefore, under the old rule, the top of the 6th would have been wiped out and the Phillies would have won a 5 inning game 2-1.

Now that truly would have been a horrid result.

— Brent
2:52 pm October 28th, 2008

So true, Brent. So true.

I think Molon has a good idea. I’ve always had a problem with performances being washed out entirely: See the Musial Lost Homer Project on the right, and click the link.

Baseball sure does seem to operate by the seat of its pants a lot.

Shame on us for not seeing this scenario sooner.

— Derrick Goold
3:03 pm October 28th, 2008

Gotta second Molon Labe here. What a joke it would have been if by starting the game when the weather didn’t really allow it and calling it in the third, therefor completely making Hamels’ start null and void.

— NoSteroidsHere
3:23 pm October 28th, 2008

Derrick you make a great point. Is this really such a far fetched situation we are in that MLB couldn’t see this coming? The fact that MLB was sweating through this last All-Star game about a tie now that it does count is a joke. Deja vu all over again and MLB still couldn’t see a tie in an ASG coming.

If baseball is all about being prepared for any situation (managers come up with them, why can’t the commish?), why isn’t MLB taking a page from baseball strategy and preparing for anything? Maybe we need an old manager as the next commish…

— NoSteroidsHere
3:28 pm October 28th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All