Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
10.02.2008 12:58 pm

What if … Wainwright hadn’t felt a pop?

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

TOWER GROVE — Adam Wainwright’s final start of the season did more than give him a 5-0 dash to the end of the season since his return from the disabled list. It rounded out a tidy total of starts for the young righthander, a group of performances that when put together not only illustrate what a full season from Wainwright might look like but also the company he keeps.

He has an elite peer group.

Since the 2007 All-Star break, Wainwright has made 35 starts, about the target for a complete season by a staff ace. He has thrown 231 2/3 innings in those starts, gone 18-8, struck out 168 batters and posted a 2.99 ERA. Of the starting pitchers with at least 200 innings and 30 starts in that same span, Wainwright is one of six with an ERA less than 3.00. Four of the five have won a Cy Young Award in their career, and the fifth is the favorite to win his first this season, San Francisco’s Tim Lincecum. The top 10, ranked by ERA in that span (* Cy Young winner):

  1. CC Sabathia*, MIL/CLE … 24-14, 2.72 ERA, 360 2/3 ip, 50 games/50 starts
  2. Tim Lincecum, SF … 21-8, 2.81 ERA, 301 1/3 ip, 46 games/45 starts
  3. Roy Halladay*, TOR … 26-15, 2.86 ERA, 362 1/3 ip, 49 games/48 starts
  4. Jake Peavy*, SD … 20-14, 2.88 ERA, 278 ip, 43 games/43 starts
  5. Johan Santana*, MN-NY … 21-14, 2.98 ERA, 332 1/3 ip, 49 games/49 starts
  6. Adam Wainwright, STL … 18-8, 2.99 ERA, 231 2/3 ip, 35 games/35 starts
  7. Cole Hamels, PHI … 19-11, 3.02 ERA, 292 ip, 43 games/43 starts
  8. Brandon Webb*, AZ … 32-11, 3.06 ERA, 332 ip, 49 games/49 starts
  9. Scott Kazmir, TB … 20-11, 3.06 ERA, 246 2/3 ip, 42 games/42 starts
  10. Tim Hudson, ATL … 19-12, 3.13 ERA, 244 1/3 ip, 38 games/37 starts

But, then, Wainwright is missing a few starts.

It’s safe to argue that the Cardinals’ 2008 season shifted on a curveball, literally and figuratively.

While warming up for a start on June 7 at Houston, Wainwright felt an odd sensation in a finger on his right hand. He described it later that night as a pop, or a small crack. He cracked his knuckles and the sensation vanished — until the sixth inning of that game. Wainwright tried to snap off a curveball. Couldn’t. He shook off the call for another curveball, and then he couldn’t locate a fastball. His pressure finger had failed him. The tendon pulley in it had ruptured.

The Cardinals went the next 2 1/2 months without their ace.

That begs the question: What If Wainwright Had Not Felt that Pop?

Unlike the previous What Ifs this week, gauging exactly how Wainwright would have pitched in his missed starts and what that would mean for the team is tricky. Do you go game by game and try to replace the pitching the Cardinals got with the pitching Wainwright might have provided? Do you pull out the PlayStation 2 or the Dynasty League Baseball dice and see where a Wainwright takes the Cardinals? There’s no real concrete way to splice Wainwright’s would-be starts into the actual starts. So, it takes a leap of statistical faith.

Pull out a Cardinals calendar it is possible to figure that Wainwright would have made 13 starts.

A rough, though educated, guess of those starts and what happened in them:

June 12, at CIN … LOSS … Joel Pineiro goes 5 innings, 2 ER

June 17, KC … LOSS … Joel Pineiro goes 7 innings, 1 ER

June 22, at BOS … LOSS … Joel Pineiro goes 7 innings, 2 ER

June 28, at KC … WIN … Mitchell Boggs goes 6 innings, 1 ER

July 3, NYM … LOSS … Mitchell Boggs goes 6 innings, 10 ER

July 8, at PHI … WIN … Joel Pineiro goes 6 1/3 innings, 0 ER

July 13, at PIT … WIN … Joel Pineiro goes 5 2/3 innings, 6 ER

July 19, SD … WIN … Todd Wellemeyer goes 6 1/3 innings, 5 ER

July 24, MIL … LOSS … Todd Wellemeyer goes 5 innings, 2 ER

July 29, at ATL …WIN … Todd Wellemeyer goes 6 innings, 2 ER

Aug 3, PHI … LOSS … Todd Wellemeyer goes 6 innings, 1 ER

Aug 9, at CHI … WIN… Todd Wellemeyer goes 6 2/3 innings, 3 ER

Aug 14, at FLA … WIN … Todd Wellemeyer goes 7 2/3 innings, 0 ER

TOTALS … 7-6 … TW 6, JP 5, Boggs 2 … 80 2/3 innings … 3.90 ERA

The Cardinals got representative starts in those games, mainly because Pineiro pitched well and Wellemeyer fell on the same date after the All-Star break. Obviously, both would have still made their starts — especially Wellemeyer — had Wainwright remained healthy, so maybe it’s better to look at the cameo starters, the Boggs of the equation, who got starts in place of starters. Combined Boggs, Mike Parisi and Jaime Garcia made nine starts. And in those nine starts they went 3-3 with a 8.86 ERA.

How much better would Wainwright have been in those starts? Here’s the leap.

Wainwright had 13 starts before he felt the pop in his finger, and it’s possible just to double his first 13 starts and call it a blog. Say he repeated his first 13 starts of the season in his second 13 starts of the season and then finished with the same 5-0 push, this would have been his line:

17-6, 3.18 ERA, 223 2/3 innings, 202 H, 54 BB, 153 K

It’s a good season, and not an unrealistic season.

The better way would be to go game by game and consider Wainwright’s performances against said team, and also to consider that his final seven starts would have been slightly shifted. (Note: In the guess schedule above, Wainwright would have been on target to start three times against the Cubs, a team he just beat for the first time in his career on Sept. 19.) That would be labor intensive and not as rewarding for the hours of input. But there is another way to look at the Missing 13.

Start by taking a look at the Missing 13’s schedule above.

Of that group, eight were scheduled to be road games, and five were scheduled to be at pitcher-friendly Busch Stadium. Applying Wainwright’s home-road splits to those games and refiguring how he and the Cardinals would have done in those games, it’s possible to get a cleaner, more refined estimate of Wainwright’s Missing 13 starts.

This is what his 2008 statistics actually were:

11-3, 3.20 ERA, 132 innings, 122 H, 34 BB, 91 K

As modified in the what-if scenario described above (and re-recalculated to be sure):

17-7, 3.29 ERA, 216 1/3 inninngs, 199 H, 57 BB, 161 K

Not too unrealistic. Not too shabby. But the truth of what Wainwright would have done in his Missing 13 starts and, then, what it would have meant to the Cardinals to have 33 starts from Wainwright is somewhere in between. There wouldn’t have been the early exposure for the rookies — but there might not have been a Boggs-like performance at Fenway Park, either. The real benefit would have been the certainties of Wainwright’s presence. Not only wins. Not only that ERA. No. It would have meant less of a rotation scramble late in the season to cover starts. And if there had never been a pop, there would have been less innings left to an unsettled and eventually fried bullpen.

***

Joining the legion of Post-Dispatch reporters and baseball writers on Twitter. Click here.

-30-

11 comments

Comments are closed.

DG: Thanks for the “what ifs”. I believe you nail it when you also reference a fried bullpen. I’ve thought all along that the bullpen failures are difficult to gauge because of the impact starters have on their potential use.
In the “what if” re Albert: one of the issues in trying to quantify his impact are runners advanced through Albert’s at bat that do not reflect directly on Albert’s stats: i.e. RBIs– but who eventually scored because he singled them to third, etc. Anyway, thanks– it’s fun to think about….

— bullera
1:51 pm October 2nd, 2008

Great stuff. Sabathia has thrown a TON of innings. And of those top pitchers, I think Wainwright fits in. Suprised to see Hudson that high. It’s a shame he’s out next season.

— Bert
2:56 pm October 2nd, 2008

I hope Wainwright can stay healthy for a full season, with an improved club playing around him. 20 wins is never a lock for anyone, but he’ll have a shot. His mold as a pitcher reminds me of a combo of Andy Benes/Daryl Kile.

— Cardsballhawk
3:59 pm October 2nd, 2008

In a word, the difference would have been ‘playoffs’.

— Joepa
5:23 pm October 2nd, 2008

I’m not sure having Waino healthy for the full 162 game season would result in a playoff birth. Waino can only due his part every fifth day, the reason the Cards didn’t make the playoffs was the bullpen. If TLR had not been so stubborn and had not continued to throw bullpen members into situations where they could not succeed then this team would have challenged for the Wildcard.

— emc2013
5:56 pm October 2nd, 2008

Considering the Cards finished 4 games out of the wild card, I agree they would have made the playoffs….but with a team limping to the end of the season, I doubt they would have done much. Ankiel out, Duncan out, Molina questionable, Albert hurting elbow, Glaus tired shoulder and no Carp. I know injuries are a part of every team, but it seems like every year they’ve made the playoffs (except W.S. Winners of 82 and 06 and an overachieving team in 96) they’ve had significant injuries for the post-season. 85 Coleman, 87 Pendleton and McGee, 2000 Matheny and Ankiel’s mental health, 2001 McGwire’s knee, 02′ Rolen injured in first round, 04′ Carp but Suppan did more than his share to make-up) 05 Rolen still. I think this year’s post-season would have been just another what-if due to multiple injuries.

— dmony
6:52 pm October 2nd, 2008

All due respect, I don’t think Waino looked like the same pitcher after he came back.

Also — what the hell is a Twitter?

Is this some private club for Internet hipsters?

-B

— Bernie Miklasz
4:04 pm October 3rd, 2008

Bernie,

I think for the most part the numbers and the eyeballs prove your opinion. Sure he finished on a rush with the 5-0 record, but he didn’t pitch well in Chicago and got the win and he slogged through a few others and still got the win. He clearly was not working with his best stuff in his second- and third-to-last starts.

That’s fact. It’s included in the fictional re-enactment above.

What is a Twitter? Heck if I know, bub. I’ve heard it described as a micro-blog, a mini-blog and a newsfeed. It’s the newsfeed element of that I’ve come to understand the power of. It’s like those old AP tickers that used to just wheel out the news items. That’s how I’ve got my “Twitter” set up. Feeds me stories from the NY Times, from the BBC, from The Sun-Times, from The Times-Picayune … And from Jake Wagman.

And really, when is there ever enough Jake Wagman.

I’ll send you the link, big man. You’re better with descriptions.

dg
-30-

— Derrick Goold
6:16 pm October 3rd, 2008

Wouldn’t another valid method be to look at the difference in win-shares compared to the pitchers that replaced him? You could even come up with a “best case” and “worst case” guess at who you think would have replaced him, then just pro-rate based on the missing 13 games.

— thad
11:59 am October 6th, 2008

Thad,

That would be a way to do it. Not sure how accessible Win Shares are to the usual fan. I tip-toe into that realm more often than some readers would like, and not enough for others. But I’d welcome anybody who take a crack at using Win Shares to define an absence …

dg
-30-

— Derrick Goold
12:04 pm October 6th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All