Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
12.03.2008 9:05 am

Braden Looper’s worth to the St. Louis Cardinals

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

WEST COUNTY — The St. Louis Cardinals decision not to offer Braden Looper arbitration by this week’s deadline can be measured in the innings they have to prove they can fill, the dollars they may have saved, and the years of security he may gain.

But don’t forget to count the prospect the Cardinals won’t get.

As a Type B free agent, Looper offered the Cardinals the opportunity to assure a supplemental (i.e., sandwich) round pick in the 2009 draft if Looper signed with another major-league team. Type A free agents tend to be viewed as the bigger windfall because, of course, offering one arbitration could score a first-round pick and a supplemental round. Milwaukee, for example, will get those two picks when/if CC Sabathia signs elsewhere, and the Brewers could net a second tandem of picks if Ben Sheets tries for a multi-year deal somewhere. That potentially could be two top-50 picks, but it’s the first-round pick that really has the sizzle.

Don’t ignore the value of a supplemental pick. Include that in the value of Looper’s arbitration.

In the Cardinals’ Top 30 prospects from last year, according to Baseball America, three of the top 10 were recent supplement picks. The Cardinals supplemental picks since 1999 are:

  • Lance Lynn, RHP, 2008 (39th overall)
  • Clayton Mortensen, RHP, 2007 (36th overall)
  • Chris Perez, RHP, 2006 (42nd overall)
  • Mark McCormick, RHP, 2005 (43rd overall)
  • Tyler Herron, RHP, 2005 (46th overall)
  • Chris Duncan, OF, 1999 (46th overall)
MLB.com)

RHP Chris Perez, closer-in-training, was a supplemental pick in 2006, for Matt Morris. (Source: MLB.com)

There is a possibility that all six of those players will reach the major leagues, with McCormick and his control/health issues being really the only uncertainty. The Cardinals are hardly alone in the success of the supplemental picks. Mitch Canham, the catcher out of Oregon State the Cardinals tried to sign a year too early, was a sandwich pick in 2007. Joba Chamberlain went a pick ahead of Perez in 2006. Huston Street was a sandwich pick, 40th overall, in 2004. And in 2003 Adam Miller, Matt Murton, Jarrod Saltalamacchia and Adam Jones went in supplemental picks awarded for free agents Jim Thome, Cliff Floyd, Tom Glavine and Mike Remlinger, respectively.

In the hearty draft of 2005, the Cardinals picked Colby Rasmus with a first-round pick they got from Boston for Edgar Renteria. Sure. The supplemental round was also rich with talent. The Cardinals got McCormick and young rising pitcher Herron, but consider the haul Boston scored with its sandwich picks: RHP Clay Buchholz, 42nd overall, and SS/2B Jed Lowrie, 45th overall. Lowrie overtook Julio Lugo this past season to win playing time at shortstop for the Red Sox. He went 30 picks before Yunel Escobar — who has gotten a smidge of attention recently — and Escobar went five after the Cardinals selected Josh Wilson, a righthanded in Quad Cities last season.

It was a heckuva draft. The supplemental round can land a heckuva talent.

So why would the Cardinals pass on offering Looper arbitration? If they had sent Looper, who made $5.5 million this past season, an offer of arbitration by Monday’s deadline, the two possible outcomes of that move would be:

  • HE ACCEPTS: This apparently was the most likely outcome. Cardinals are locked in to a one-year contract with Looper, he is added to the 40-man roster and his salary will be determined by arbitration, though negotiations can continue until the beginning of the hearing later this offseason.
  • HE DECLINES, SIGNS ELSEWHERE: Cardinals get a supplemental-round pick.

Clearly the fear of the salary he could get through arbitration was enough to chill the Cardinals’ interest in getting that draft pick or gambling that Looper would decline arbitration to get a multi-year deal elsewhere. The supplemental-round pick, as discussed, is usually no slouch. It has a tremendous value. So, what kind of salary would the Cardinals expect Looper to get that would make the pick unappetizing or paying that much for his innings unappealing? It must be some salary.

Or, and here’s the elephant in the decision, the Cardinals are playing thriftier than has been reported.

Baltimore OF Adam Jones = reward for Mike Remlinger.

Baltimore OF Adam Jones = reward for Mike Remlinger.

If the possibility that Looper would accept arbitration and the one-year deal was real — and it likely was — then the Cardinals shrank from what a 33-start, 199-inning starting pitcher could get in arbitration. (One scenario has Looper comparing favorably to a pitcher like Carlos Silva, and getting an arbitration reward of $10 million or more.) The Cardinals weren’t alone. There were 12 free agent starting pitchers who were either Type A or Type B free agents and all had at least 30 starts and 180 innings pitched last season. Seven were offered arbitration. Of those seven, only two were Type B — Paul Byrd in Boston and Jon Garland with the Los Angeles Angels. Looper, as a Type B not offered arbitration, joins the likes of Randy Johnson, Greg Maddux and Randy Wolf. Andy Pettitte, a Type A free agent, was not offered arbitration by the New York Yankees. They simply don’t want him back at $16 million.

What pressure could be on players like Looper to accept one-year deal via arbitration even if they seek a multi-year deal? It’s the same pressure on teams that leads them to not offer arbitration at all.

The economic downturn has reached baseball.

Yahoo! Sports Jeff Passan explores the issue through the Adam Dunn prism in his recent article, “Economy Model”. He concurs: Clubs are reluctant to offer arbitration out of the sheer terror that a player will accept it. Arbitration means the free-market won’t set the salary, a hearing and all of the rules of that hearing will. Arbitration is a lifeboat from the economic Titanic — it offers the guarantee of a good raise, at least. The free market this year could be hairy. Looper, who may draw interest from Cincinnati, may not find the salary in the open market because of the economic chill that he could lock in with arbitration.

Passan also suggests that some teams were even trying to avoid the signing bonuses they’d have to use on draft picks next season. Seems a little penny-pinching. But it also seems like teams are pinching their pennies in this glacial free agent market. The Cardinals love their picks. They point to the number of picks they had early in 2005 as the turnaround for their farm system. But when it came to Looper, the hinge of their decision is obvious. When it came to choosing a 30-start pitcher at a TBD salary or a supplemental pick, the Cardinals felt in this climate neither was worth the risk of that TBD.

Even the potential of the pick didn’t outweigh the probable cost.

RIFFS

Over at Seamheads.com, Mike Lynch has a forgotten tale from the Cardinals’ past about Austin McHenry, a comet who streaked into the majors and then suddenly, rapidly lost his ability to play before dying at 27. The reason why will surprise you. It’s quite an article: “The Promising Life and Sudden Death of Austin McHenry”. … Having become hesitant to meet the asking price for Rafael Furcal, the San Francisco Giants have apparently made Edgar Renteria their priority at shortstop, and his price could quickly climb out of the Cardinals neighborhood, if it hasn’t already. … Cincinnati general manager Walt Jocketty, in a rush of candor, acknowledges his offer to Arthur Rhodes, saying in this John Fay blog that the lefty has “quite a lot of interest in him.” Rhodes is said to have mutual interest in the Cardinals.

The new web site design for Tony La Russa’s Animal Rescue Foundation debuted Tuesday. Check it out here: www.arf.net. … La Russa also has his annual charity concert set for Jan. 18, 2009, at Chaifetz Arena on the Saint Louis University campus. Vince Gill is scheduled to appear, as is Huey Lewis. But I’d go for the rant: Lewis Black is one of the comedians booked for the gig.

-30-

13 comments

Comments are closed.

My thought is that, as I understood it, there used to be “gentleman’s agreements” between teams and players such that it was understood that the team would offer arbitration and the player would decline it. If that is true, it would seem like this would have been a perfect case for it, unless it was absolutely certain that Looper was going to accept arbitration and the potential for getting the draft pick was moot. I wouldn’t think that being a Type B FA who was offered, and declined, arbitration would have decreased Looper’s free market value at all, since the signing team wouldn’t actually lose a pick to the Cards - the Cards would just benefit by getting a sandwich pick.

— Matt Mitchell
10:56 am December 3rd, 2008

Since the Cards overpaid Looper the first two years of his contract (Thanks Walt), I don’t think they wanted to get stuck with a 8 - 10 million dollar one year contact for him. He’s no better than Suppan. Maybe good one start and then bad for the next two starts. If he signs with any other sub-500 team he will end up at 9-16. Too many times his out pitch (sinker) didn’t seem to get it done.

— Dave
11:16 am December 3rd, 2008

The McHenry article was excellent. It underscored how fleeting fame can be.

— b_hern
11:20 am December 3rd, 2008

If you haven’t read the Austin McHenry article, you are missing out. Tragic but very enjoyable.

— Cleanholio
11:21 am December 3rd, 2008

One factor that you are ignoring in your analysis is that the Arbitration salary is not guaranteed. If the club cuts the player 45 days before spring training, the club only has to pay the player 1/6 of their salary. That would undercut the risks you describe in offering Looper arbitration tremendously.

— Scott
12:07 pm December 3rd, 2008

The Looper situation makes absolutely no sense to me.

The one thing I like about Looper is the stability he would have provided to the Cards rotation. Since he made the move from bullpen to rotation, he has shown that he can give you a good amount of innings and 30+ starts.

Nobody was asking that Looper win 15 games. I would’ve accepted a 10-12 wins, 199 innings pitched, and 30 starts from Looper for the 2009 season. That is pretty solid production from a #4 starter, and you could have him at a one year deal for a reasonable price. Looking at the current SP on the Cards roster, I can put a question mark by a number of them, due to past injury history. with Looper you knew there was a good chance you would get 30 starts and solid amount of innings.

— emc2013
12:22 pm December 3rd, 2008

I thought, the way he pitched, Looper should have had about eighteen wins last year. Yes, he did have his occassional horrid game but they were less frequent than 2007. My opinion is that he is really beginning to get the hang of the starting gig. I hope he will not be missed sometime around September 2009.

— royearl
1:36 pm December 3rd, 2008

If I were Braden Looper, I would be trying to get paid in a big way. He has been the ultimate team player. He has shown a lot of progress in these past 2 years as a starting pitcher and this will probably be his last shot at a sizeable contract in his career.

Some team will pay 3 years 24 million for a 4.14 era over 200 innings.

— Brian White
1:50 pm December 3rd, 2008

I would suggest that we see what develops. At the moment I like the flexibilty that the Cards have. If a better pitcher becomes available for the 5/6 starter, or even if there is a 2/3 starter available, they can make the move as opposed to being tied up for a currently unknown arbitration amount to Looper. If Looper does not get a better deal elsewhere, and the Cards still need a starting pitcher in January, they can try to bring him back. There are going to be pitchers with Looper’s abilities that are going to be without a musical chair at the end of free agency. Don’t forget that is how the Cards got Lohse.

— Indiana Cardinal
2:43 pm December 3rd, 2008

I honestly think the problem with Looper is that the club believes that the pitcher has no upside. If they look in the dictionary under ‘.500 pitcher’ there is a photo of Braden’s evil, toothy grimace.

There are a lot of .500 pitchers in the world that teams run after, but it is in the hopes of being able to grow them into .600 pitchers. Or because “four years ago with the Dodgers” they were a .600 pitcher. BL doesn’t have either of those going for him. At his age he isn’t growing into anything and he doesn’t have that phenominal year as a starter because he wasn’t one.

— Joepa
4:32 pm December 3rd, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All