St. Louis Cardinals Community Top 30: Runoff for 21
SOUTH GRAND — Already the closest vote in two years of doing the (Bird Land) Community Top 30, the poll for No. 21 produced something even more remarkable while, numbed by baseball’s sputtering hot stove, we caught up on Christmas shopping this weekend.
After more than 530 voters clicked in, No. 21 is a virtual tie.
Pitcher Fernando Salas and outfielder Shane Robinson each received 25 percent of the vote. At the time I checked this morning, Salas had 134 votes and Robinson had 133. Hardly enough to determine a victor because it could change while I write this. So, we’ll solve this with a runoff. Consider the previous entry (”Best Bang for the Biggest Bonus“) a primary and today’s poll an election. The winner will be the 21st-best prospect in the St. Louis Cardinals system according to the community here.
The loser … Well, here’s why this poll continues to intrigue. Not too far behind the leading two is third-place Roberto De La Cruz, who isn’t far enough behind to assume that he won’t win No. 22.
So, the runoff first. Then on to No. 22. Some scouting info on the two in the runoff is available below, after the poll:
OF SHANE ROBINSON: Hit .410/.451/.615 in April and probably could have won the Texas League batting title if not for a promotion to Triple-A. Robinson changed his swing during spring training and became more of a contact hitter, using an improved sense of the strike zone and his speed to morph into a productive leadoff hitter and a No. 4-outfielder type with promise. Robinson was Collegiate Baseball’s National Player of the Year in 2005. He had a 40-game hitting streak in college and he reached base in 57 consecutive games for Florida State. From the scouting report I submitted to Baseball America: Robinson “turned every hit into a track meet.” Manager Pop Warner told him during spring that he had to change his swing because trying to conjure power wasn’t his best way to the majors, flat hitting and running was. “You find a place for a guy who is hitting .380,” Warner said.
RHP FERNANDO SALAS: The Cardinals wooed him from the Mexican League in 2007 and installed him as a member of the piggyback rotation* in High-A Palm Beach. He struggled, going 2-3, 5.26 in 16 games. The Cardinals returned him to his Mexican League team to finish the season. When he returned to the club for 2008, the Cardinals used him exclusively as a reliever and he became the team’s Futures Game rep. He throws a 91-92 mph fastball and a quality curve. His best trait his command and his ability to fire that fastball to four corners of the strike zone. He became one of the finest relievers in the Texas League with, as scouts said, “among the best ability to just throw strikes.” He struck out 100 against 16 walks in 74 innings. In his final 59 games, he walked just 10. He led the Texas League with 25 saves, though his immediate future could be as a setup man in Triple-A, depending on how the major-league bullpen shakes down.
* Piggyback Rotation (noun): Where pitchers are paired off and alternate starts every four games. The idea is to cram eight starters into the rotation while also stressing low pitch counts between-game preparation. The drawback is pitchers have to buy into having their season judged on more than just wins because rarely does the starter last long enough to grab the win. Palm Beach broke from the tandem rotation later in the season, thought the Cardinals have used it successfully in Quad Cities and at several other lower levels.
-30-


Derrick Goold said he was going to Mizzou for capital-J journalism, but after growing up in the Time Zone Baseball Forgot he was really drawn to MU sitting between two major-league cities. Goold joined the Post-Dispatch in 2001 after working for The Times-Picayune and Rocky Mountain News, covering sports from LSU to NHL and every level of baseball in between.
I realize that there has been considerable talk about Schumacher being on the trade block. My suggestion is that he and Robinson could platoon to be a very good lead off and defensive option, considering that there does not seem to be another good lead off option amongst the current players.
I’m confused about your remarks re: the “piggyback” starter system. I thought the plan, for both Quad Cities and Palm Beach anyway, was very specifically to have a piggyback rotation for the first 6-8 weeks of the season, then switch to a conventional rotation for the remainder of the year–thereby limiting the innings somewhat for the younger arms, and also allowing the first several weeks of the season to serve as a defacto audition for rotation spots during the rest of the year. Is that inaccurate?
When you talk about what Shane R. did in AA, it would probably be useful to also mention how completely overmatched he was in AAA. (Many of your readers don’t follow the minors all that closely, and might find that info valuable when voting, DG.)
Bob,
I am always hesitant to repeat over and over and over again information about these prospects who have been in the poll for several entries in a row. Robinson’s struggles at Triple-A were mentioned earlier. This time I tried to go with new stuff. Obviously some stuff has to be repeated, but I tried not to rehash and rehash and rehash. Things would get stale, right?
The piggyback rotation was set up for that to be an option. When they first installed it at Quad Cities, the piggyback was supposed to last the entire season, as long as there were enough starters to fill the eighth spots. At Palm Beach, the hope was that five pitchers would eventually emerge and a more traditional rotation would develop. At the short-season levels, the Cardinals used the tandem rotation to get more innings for more pitchers and didn’t set it up as a competition. Though, they appear to have always left that option open if two, three pitchers emerge.
Several times the pitchers who were ready for a traditional rotation were just promoted to the next level.
Leadoff hitter? There “does not seem to be another good lead off option amongst current players.” Indiana, allow me to introduce you to Colby Rasmus. Colby, Indiana. Indiana, Colby. He’s a fine lead-off option.
dg
-30-
DG,
Colby being a good leadoff option is debatable at best. To me using him at leadoff would negate some of the value from his power. I think he is the ideal #2 hitter for LaRussa. He can potentially hit for power and get on base. I’m not saying he would not do well at leadoff, Pujols would be a great leadoff hitter, but I don’t think its optimal.
It may not be (long-term) optimal, but it is (short-term) realistic. I agree with the No. 2 fit, but his ability to walk, run and his extra-base threat makes him a viable option at leadoff, even as a rookie.
DG: Thanks for your work throughout the year. Always enjoy your insight/opinions. Any chance Colby can play second? (Sorry. Just my sick humor!)
Allen