Being a Cardinal “made my career happen,” says Aaron Miles
TOWER GROVE — In a few days, newly-minted Chicago Cubs infielder Aaron Miles will have a reunion of sorts at a charity event with the manager that made him a millionaire. He expects the worst.
“I just talked to him, and Tony said,” Miles said, pausing for effect, “that he’s really going to give it to me.”
Miles, fresh from signing a two-year, $4.9-million deal with the Cubs, will attend an Animal Rescue Foundation benefit in California later this week as a guest of Tony — St. Louis Cardinals manager Tony La Russa, that is, the foundation’s creator. When Miles called La Russa to tell him he had decided to take the more lucrative offer and more lucrative opportunity with the Cubs, the manager understood and then offered a warning. Miles’ defection to the North Side was not going to go without ridicule at the ARF function. Oh, this won’t be Jim Edmonds Revisited. This all so So Taguchi. The humor will be on purpose.
Miles will welcome a shared laugh.
“I beat myself up for a good day or two (before calling La Russa), and I didn’t really feel good about signing elsewhere until even then,” Miles said Friday morning. “Understanding that in the end it was more money, and it seems like the same opportunity — a chance to start at second base, be a good utility guy. What I did in St. Louis — spot starter, quasi-starter, coming off the bench. I’ll be doing the same job, playing as much and maybe even playing more.
“But it was still the toughest decision I’ve had to make because St. Louis was the greatest experience I’ve ever had in baseball,” Miles concluded. “Being with the Cardinals made my career happen. I started in Colorado, but I made a name for myself in St. Louis.”

Former Cardinals utility infielder Aaron Miles handles the pivot during the 2006 World Series. (Source: Getty Images)
After catching wind of how some of his comments to Chicago baseball writers this week played in the message boards and radio studios of St. Louis and keenly aware of the David Eckstein Debacle of last winter, Miles called me on Friday morning to offer some farewell thoughts. Those included his views on how he became the latest in a parade of infielders to leave. Miles had carved out quite a niche with the Cardinals — a utility infielder who played almost as much as a regular and regularly won the starting job at second base despite the Cardinals’ best efforts to put somebody else in the position. Roll call: Junior Spivey. Ronnie Belliard. Adam Kennedy. Felipe Lopez.
Through all of it, Miles remained a favorite of La Russa’s … remains a favorite.
On KSLG/1380 this past Friday, La Russa repeated to baseball writer Joe Strauss an admission he made late last season: Miles earned more playing time than he got. Columnist Bernie Miklasz, whose show had La Russa as a guest, quoted from that interview in this morning’s paper, capturing La Russa’s opinion on Miles’ departure: “We took a big hit with Miles.” Miles set career highs in 2008 across his hitting line, batting .317, slugging .398 and reaching base with a .355 on-base percentage. More telling than his .300 average, Miles personified an essential piece of La Russa’s lineup — a movable beast, so to speak, and more correctly an insurance policy at multiple positions. Shortstop injured? Start Miles. Second baseman struggling? Start Miles.
Utility fielder released? Good thing there’s Miles around.
La Russa was not alone in his fondness for Miles as a scrapper and person. La Russa’s view of Miles as a player, however, was not universally shared by the Cardinals’ brain trust, specifically not at the price of a starter. And certainly not landlocked like they are now with Kennedy under contract for 2009.
“St. Louis was the best time I could have had playing baseball, and it’s the best time I’ve had in my career playing baseball,” Miles said. “I really felt like I had a part of the team there, and that I was a part of the family. I loved playing for Tony La Russa. I understand the finances of it. I know what they have to consider. I know why they non-tendered me each year. I really considered taking less money to go back, even though I knew I wouldn’t be guaranteed to play a lot. It felt like there was always a move to bring in somebody besides me.
“And that’s the business, that’s the game, so it didn’t bother me,” Miles concluded. “But to be non-tendered again, that made me feel so expendable.”
Said his agent: “As excited as he is for the opportunity with the Cubs, he was very melancholy about leaving St. Louis.”
The Cubs pursuit of Miles intensified the weekend after Christmas, and the entire deal hinged around the Cubs being able to deal second baseman/super utility fielder Mark DeRosa. When they completed that swap with Cleveland, they made their offer to Miles formal. The Cardinals entered at the 11th hour, and Miles said the offer was both a surprise and a complication. He spent many hours laboring over the decision. Miles said the offer from the Cardinals was a two-year deal and that the difference between it and the Cubs’ offer could have been $1 million. Several sources described the Cardinals’ offer as worth a total of around $4.3 million, or $600,000 less guaranteed than the Cubs’ contract.
Though neither side is saying it, that seems like the kind of deal that could have been offered and agreed to before the non-tender day. The Cardinals, however, had more moving pieces — namely Kennedy — in play.

Aaron Miles, shown here in the July game he drove in five runs against Pittsburgh, didn't get as much playing time as he deserved, Tony La Russa said. (Source: USAToday)
This was, technically, the third consecutive year that the Cardinals non-tendered Miles, but this was different. For the first time the non-tender notice did not come with an offer, Miles said. In seasons past the Cardinals non-tendered Miles to avoid arbitration with the switch-hitter. A few sources estimated the salary he could get through arbitration at approximately $2.5 million, though there are scenarios where arbitration — which by rule is immune to the market and economic conditions — could set a salary above that estimate.
Eight teams had shown interest in Miles leading up to the Cardinals becoming the ninth on the day he signed with the Cubs, his agent said. Of those eight teams, the two best opportunities for playing time were with the Cardinals (where he knew he had the track record of winning at-bats) and the Cubs (who were going to clear a spot for him in the lineup). He may play multiple positions for the Cubs, but he’ll get those at-bats.
He was, after all, a .392 hitter during days games in 2008, and .321 during the day since 2006.
As he stewed over his decision, Miles’ decision broke along simple lines: Stick with the team that made him the player who was now drawing interest in a soft market or go to the team that showed the most interest in signing him.
“It was a tough choice, no question,” Miles said. “But it felt like I was really wanted more by the Cubs. I may only have one crack at making this kind of money in this game. I spent nine years in the minors and now I’ve got six years in the big leagues. I’ve clawed for every inch I can get, and … my earning potential is very, very, very short in this game. I like the security of the deal and that I’m playing for a team that has a chance to win the World Series. I could say the same thing about the Cardinals. I was going to be a Cub because I didn’t have an offer from the Cardinals. When I got one, it made things tougher because of what I was a part of there. The Cardinals made me as a player.
“In the end, I know I went with the team that wanted me more,” he concluded. “I’m sure of that.”
-30-


Derrick Goold said he was going to Mizzou for capital-J journalism, but after growing up in the Time Zone Baseball Forgot he was really drawn to MU sitting between two major-league cities. Goold joined the Post-Dispatch in 2001 after working for The Times-Picayune and Rocky Mountain News, covering sports from LSU to NHL and every level of baseball in between.
People’s feelings about the Cardinals’ fans notwithstanding, I’m a little perplexed about some takes on comments made by Aaron Miles. First, I don’t particularly see backpedaling, waffling or contradiction . . . just clarification. Most of us have been misunderstood or just had our comments take on a different tone than we would’ve liked–even without being misquoted. And most of us have had to weigh multiple options, realizing that any choice will come with a cost. After hearing guys that are all about being P.C. and offending no one, or (on the other extreme) guys who say things just to raise people’s ire, I was glad to hear miles speak with neither a script nor an agenda.
And on CardsNation–the forum claims it has standards for content, but the comment remains about 18 hours after being posted . . . and it was posted for no other reason than to offend. C’mon, P-D online, live up to your standards.
“We took a big hit with Miles,” La Russa said. “I never had a teammate any better than Aaron Miles, in all of the years I’ve managed. This guy deserves every bit of credit, recognition, respect for his three years with us that you could give him. This guy was really good for us. It was paining for him to leave us, and he left, and that’s a tough loss.” This quote from TLR says it all regarding Miles. What Tony felt about him is shared by many wise fans in the Cardinal Nation. What’s really disturbing is that apparently Tony’s opinions on players no longer carry a lot of weight with the front office. If Tony really felt that strongly about Miles, than he should have been re-signed weeks ago, period!!!! I can’t see TLR putting up with this lack of respect much longer. I’d be shocked if he still wants to manage this team after 2009.
who is going to be our utility player now? Ryan is good defensively but his batting is best termed as couldnt hit water if he fell out of a boat. Miles, though just giving lip service, was exactly what we needed and by letting him go we not only lost his service but allowed the cubs to set themselves up for something else
There was a vile comment made by CardinalsNation — an trust me when I say the ugly nature of the comment actually went beyond what was seen publicly. It slipped through the net here, and for that I apologize. I deleted it as soon as I saw it.
The rest of the comments seem to cover the spectrum of the Miles Decision. Interesting takes abound. And I amazed by the chatter this move — or non-move — has stirred. Could be because it’s Miles. Could be because it’s the Cub. Could be because it plays into all of the preconceptions Cardinals Nation has of Cardinals Management. Probably is all of those things …
dg
-30-
Hey Derrick. KaKa happens. Why a few alleged sports fans post such trash is beyond me - let’s however, be thankful they are in the vast minority. You hit the nail on the head, Seems to be a three way split, Miles fans, Anti-Cubs posts and Anti- Cards management posts. I’ll repeat my earlier feeling on this, Card management didn’t cover its rear end. If you want someone on your club - you make sure they know it. And, you don’t do it by putting that player at YOUT mercy by non tnedering him. Be fair. This guy wasn’t gonna break the bank. We USED to have a hockey team here in Chicago where ownership was under some misguided impression that it was such an HONOR to wear the indian head sweater that star players should play for half of what they got elsewhere. As I also said, Card fans are good fans, I hope for their sake Card management/ownership isn’t following that same line of thinking.
A Miles…Mighty Mite…will be sorly missed in a STL uniform…He definately is a CLASS ACT..and one heck of a baseball player.
I’m glad for the time we had and that he got his payday.
I’m not looking forward to the day he burns us!
On the other hand he’s going to play for the Flubs…I hope he is prepared to handle disappointment and failure. Do they have a pill for that?
Good luck Mighty Mite, thanks for the memories.
anybody got Polonco’s phone number?
Yeah, DG. It has been a bit surprising to here all the reactions to this story. I think all the reasons that you listed are strong reasons as to why this move has created so much “chatter”.
True, it probably has been discussed a little bit more heavily because Miles signed with the rival Cubs. True, it is Aaron Miles a fan favorite, and it is true that it “plays into all the preconceptions Cardinal Nation has of Cardinals Management”.
However, I think more than anything though is that it is just something to talk about in what, with the exclusion of the Khalil Greene trade and Miller signing, has a been a very slow and dull offseason for Cardinal Nation.
The bullpen also takes a minor hit with his departure. Two or three times Miles pitched late inning relief in blowout games. Also it was one of his foul balls that cost Juan Encarnacion his vision and career. I know that was a freak and unfortunate accident. Miles was a scrappy player though and I liked him.
C’mon the guy obviously did it for the only reason that anyone goes to the Cubs. Thats the money. He obviously was beat up leaving a team that has a reputation as a scrappy team just like him as a player. He fit in well with Stl. besides who wants to play for a team that has all that pressure unless they are being overpaid.
THANK YOU DERRICK!! I was very ‘vocal’ in expressing my displeasure to Bernie on his blog after carelessely characterizing Aaron Miles as a ’smack’ talker for (god forbid) being honest in expressing his disappointment with the Cardinals. Bernie should have contacted Aaron and asked for clarification, but chose to be a columnist instead of a journalist. Aaron deserved better, and your story showed what a class act this guy was and always will be. It remains to be seen what kind of player he will be if allowed to claim a daily roster spot, but I guarantee that even if his average drops as a result, we’ll still wish he were here when our overpaid regulars are sitting out with blisters and sore feet. So again, thank you for giving Aaron the stage he deserved to talk to his fans in a clear and definitive way. You’re a class act.