Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
01.28.2008 1:52 pm

More on fantasy for young adults, Hamilton, Part 1

Post-Dispatch Book Editor

I was trying to provoke discussion with my post about an upcoming young adult fantasy novel that reminded me of Laurell K. Hamilton’s Merry Gentry series. But the response has been not so much discussion as online bullying.

On the one hand it’s nice to have some passion associated with literature. On the other, most of the posts here don’t really address the questions I brought up. So I’m going to try to clarify some questions and thoughts here on what I was referring to by saying that “Ink Exchange” by Melissa Marr ’seems to take a page’ from the Hamilton series. Note: I never used the word plagiarize and I have read most of the book. Most of the folks ranting can’t say the same thing. Many of the comments seem to be by people who like to sound off, but who are not careful readers. This note is long, so I’m posting it in 2 parts.

1. First, in the title of the post I use a question mark. In other words, it asks a question about whether this young adult book is a knock-off of the Hamilton series rather than just state categorically that it is. However, I DO think the Marr cover does resemble the Hamilton series, which began in 2000. The series is fairly identifiable by the covers’ motif, which usually is a monotone, shadowy image of part of a sexy woman’s body (no full face), often with S-M overtones. Hamilton’s more recent Anita Blake books also have such covers; they too sometimes have tattoos, scant clothing.

Marr’s cover is less sexy, but also features a lovely woman or girl in a shadowy, monotone image that shows only part of the face. She has a tattoo and appears to be wearing a sleeveless, strapless, filmy top or dress. It is far less erotic, with no S-M overtones, thank heavens. Many people might think, though, that it does evoke a certain sensuality. It seems appropriate for older, teen readers.

What reminds me of Hamilton’s series is the monotone, shadowy picture of a young woman’s body, particularly from behind. Some comments have said that this image is common in young adult literature; I have not seen any, and I have been looking on the web at other young adult fantasy literature. I also receive about 300 books a week in my office and this is the first young adult book that I have noticed that struck me as having a cover similar to the Hamilton series. If someone knows of another book about urban fantasy, faery courts & mortals that sports a monotone image of a young woman, please send me the title. I see thousands of books and no young adult book  has ever reminded me of Hamilton’s series until this one. I know there are other books about faeries and sex.

2. When I ask - again in a question - when imitation ends and copyright infringement begins, I am being somewhat provocative. I know that it is very difficult to bring any kind of lawsuit regarding such things against a novel. (Remember the failure of the million-dollar suit against “The Da Vinci Code.” For many folks that suit seemed silly just because the authors in the suit had written a nonfiction book, not a novel.) In St. Louis, there was a complicated suit by a real-life person because a book’s character appeared to be based on him. I will research that suit to learn whether it is still in appeal.

Back to the blog post: I did not give my own thoughts about whether there was anything untoward happening - I’m not a lawyer, of course. I do think the young adult  book cover reminds me of the Hamilton series, which is longer-running and much more famous. The young adult book isn’t even out yet; an advance reader’s edition shows an image that could, conceivably, change before the final book is released.

Many books have covers that give a sense of a certain type of book or genre. This helps the reader, to some extent, know whether the book is a romance, a thriller, a cozy mystery, etc. The images convey information about how they may be similar to other books in a genre or type. I believe this is a reader service, to a large extent.  No laws are broken, particularly when there are many books in that genre that sport images that are similar.

A side note: I frequently have spoken to friends and readers who do NOT remember by looking at a book jacket whether they have read the book! Some series have similar images and titles. Only by reading a description of the plot or some of the book do they answer their own question about whether they have read that book in the past.

Another comment: with about 175,000-200,000 books being published just in the United States in a year, obviously some books and titles are going to look and sound similar. Sometimes titles are repeated, in fact.

3. Some comments imply that I know nothing about what is in Marr’s book. I have, in fact, read quite a bit of it, although not every word. And I have read some of Hamilton’s series, although far from all of it.

The Merry Gentry series refers to the traditional Seelie and Unseelie Courts of the faeries and the heroine is part mortal and part faerie. Marr uses the terms  Summer Court and Winter Court or Dark Court. In “Ink Exchange,” the heroine, Leslie, gets a unique tattoo (while she receives it she starts feeling euphoric and sort of “high”) and becomes attracted to a frightening but sexy faery. I don’t want to give away the plot. I hope it’s suffice to say that Leslie starts consorting with the faeries, who fight over her and caress her (”her eyes blurred at the pleasure at that casual touch - not anger, not fear - just want”). It is a long, LONG way from blatant erotica, and Marr is a good writer. But there are references to pot, rape, ‘hooking up,’  violence, dealing drugs, “selling” Leslie, etc. Which leads me to my next comment in part 2.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (13 votes, average: 1.85 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
10 comments

Comments are closed.

[…] the issues with less of an intention to stir up controversy with off the cuff remarks, “More on young adult fantasy, Hamilton” and “More on fantasy book, part 2” , and provided more discussion. And gee, […]

[…] More on Young adult fantasy, Hamilton - St. Louis Post-Dispatch […]

— that hamilton woman | News of course
11:10 pm January 28th, 2008

Ms Henderson,

You said, “What reminds me of Hamilton’s series is the monotone, shadowy picture of a young woman’s body, particularly from behind.”

Let’s ignore the fact that Hamilton’s books don’t feature teenage models on them like Marr’s books do. Here are some examples of Young Adult novels featuring young female cover models shot from behind/behind profile: TATTOO, by Jennifer Lynn Barnes, A GREAT AND TERRIBLE BEAUTY, by Libba Bray, SWEET THING, by Libba Bray, THE LUXE, by Anna Godbersen, GOSSIP GIRL, IT HAD TO BE YOU, by Cecily von Ziegesar, and BETRAYED, by PC Cast, [links embedded in my prior post that is still “awaiting moderation”]. I found these examples after only five minutes of browsing on Amazon under the “teens” category. If you want to see more examples of covers showing “pictures of a young woman’s body, particularly from behind”, they’re not hard to find. I could go link crazy showing you *adult* novels with females pictured from behind/behind in profile, with tattoos to boot - which would be a better example of covers similar to Hamitlon’s, since at least those are in the same readership - but I don’t want my post to be pages long.

You also said, “The Merry Gentry series refers to the traditional Seelie and Unseelie Courts of the faeries…Marr uses the terms Summer Court and Winter Court or Dark Court.”

Seelie and Unseelie courts come from ancient Scottish folklore, not from Laurell K Hamilton. In fact, if you look at Wikipedia, you’ll note Wiki references use of these courts in LKH’s books, as well as books by authors who’ve utilized this same mythology in books that have pre (and post) dated Hamilton’s series.

And then you said, “Some comments imply that I know nothing about what is in Marr’s book. I have, in fact, read quite a bit of it, although not every word.”

Well, I have read every word of INK EXCHANGE, and I’ve also read the first three books in the Merry Gentry series. INK EXCHANGE is the story of a 17 year old human girl who gets pulled into a conflict between faery courts after getting a tattoo with supernatural consequences. The Merry Gentry series (in the first few books, at least) features an adult faery princess who keeps a harem of faery men in order to try to become pregnant as soon as possible, or risk death if she fails to conceive. In INK EXCHANGE, there is the off-page suggestion of sex between the heroine and one man. In the Merry Gentry series, there are numerous detailed sex scenes between Merry and multiple different partners. Sometimes Merry has sex with several men at once, all on-page for the reader to see.

Now, I’m not knocking LKH’s storyline; I’m just pointing out that the two are similar only on the basis of both books having female heroines and faeries in them. To say more is like calling the Harry Potter series a “knock off” or “copyright infringement” of Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings saga. Why? Well, both those series have troubled boy heroes - both with dark hair! They both have magic! Wizards! Enchanted forests! Spectacular creatures! A Greater Evil to Defeat with the help of Motley Friends! And the Greater Evil in both series features…wait for it…antagonists who were once destroyed in body but yet their spirits lived on!!

So then, to apply the same standards you used with Marr and Hamilton, JK Rowling has some SERIOUS ’splaining to do. I, of course, think both series are completely different despite those superficial similarities, but if the world lived by your rules, Rowling would be in court with the Tolkien estate today.

Furthermore, if you don’t like the fact that the range for Young Adult novels is twelve and up, then by all means, write to publishing companies. As with movies, where there’s PG-13, and then right to an R rating, there is no “PG-16″ rating for books. But comparing Marr’s INK EXCHANGE to Hamilton’s Merry Gentry series in terms of sensual content is much like comparing the teen movie 10 THINGS I HATE ABOUT YOU to Kubrick’s EYES WIDE SHUT. In short, it’s misleading at best.

If you want to do an article on how young women are being cast in sensual lights at an early age, then more power to you. But you may want to better research your source choices in order to prove your point more effectively.

Finally, you said, “But the response has been not so much discussion as online bullying.”

You asked for thoughts at the end of your original post. People emailed you with their thoughts. The fact that many of them did not agree with you shouldn’t put them in the “bullying” category. It only puts them in the “viewers with opinions” category.

— Jeaniene Frost
9:18 am January 29th, 2008

[…] the fur really starts to fly *g*, back at the original post.  Then yesterday, Henderson posts “More on young adult fantasy, Hamilton” and “More on fantasy book, part 2” and mucks things up […]

[…] the fur really starts to fly *g*, back at the original post.  Then yesterday, Henderson posts “More on young adult fantasy, Hamilton” and “More on fantasy book, part 2” and mucks things up again. I will be keeping up with the […]

— Where Does It Go From Here? « Urban Fantasy Land
10:17 am January 29th, 2008

Regarding the list of books purported to have similar covers. The only one that seems similar to me in that it has a monotone image of girl from back is the one on “Betrayed.” But that series apparently is about vampires, not faeries, so again, there are no other series that I know of that are so evocative of Hamilton’s faeries series.
I do know about the Scottish faerie courts - that is why I called the Seelie court ‘traditional.’ Sorry if that was unclear.

Melissa Marr’s website discusses the fact that she is often asked if her books are appropriate for younger readers and she gives a very good answer. She also admits that a friend found that the new book, “Ink Exchange,” was a bit too sexy for his 12-year-old. As Marr says, the best thing is for parents to read the books the younger readers are reading if they have concerns about what kind of entertainment the kids are exposed to. If they don’t think it matters, then that’s up to them. No one is suggesting censorship of any kind.

Publishers can label books as appropriate for ages 15 and up if they chose. I would imagine that they try to get as wide a range of readers as possible to increase the profit margin.

— Jane Henderson
11:10 am January 29th, 2008

And yes, all the attention to this subject makes me think I should do a newspaper article on these young adult series for girls, not just fantasy but the the reality ‘gossip girls’-type.

I know a lot of librarians will be interested in talking about how they group the books and whether parents are concerned at all about any of them.

Many of the young girls I know who are avid readers may be drawn to the light relationship/school/clique stories with some sexual innuendo. As a parent, if my daughter was and she had no significant problems in the real life aspects that these novels deal with - i.e. casual sex, family relationships, drugs, drinking, etc. - I don’t think I’d care at all if she were reading them. If my daughter was troubled or easily influenced by peers, etc., I might want to talk to her more about how the girls in the books are portrayed. and how they do - or should - deal with these issues.

— Jane Henderson
11:20 am January 29th, 2008

“But that series apparently is about vampires, not faeries, so again, there are no other series that I know of that are so evocative of Hamilton’s faeries series.”

I showed you several similar YA covers. In your opinion, only one was close, but that doesn’t count because it was about vampires, not faeries? Similar cover art is similar cover art! It baffles me to the extreme that you can say, ” In the romance genre, it’s sometimes hard to tell one author from the next,” thus generalizing an ENTIRE GENRE OF BOOKS, but yet when I show you -admittedly - a similar cover to Hamilton’s, it doesn’t count because the creature inside is a vampire versus a faery?? Do you know how many different creatures/worlds/storylines/contemporary/historical/futuristic books are in romance, yet to you, they’re “hard to tell one author from the next.” But when it comes to LKH, you’re dogfighting over faeries versus vampires. How is that even close to logical?

The main premise of INK EXCHANGE is that a teenage girl gets a supernatural tattoo (on her back!) and then is unwillingly drawn into the faery world. What does INK’s cover show? A young girl with an obviously paranormal tattoo on her back. But to you, instead of that being a good image of the book’s main plot, it’s only a “knock off” of another author’s series that just so happens to also feature faeries. By your same logic, then, any author who writes about faeries is being “evocative” of Hamilton. And in that instance, it seems to be a case of “I’ve made up my mind, don’t confuse me with the facts” when it comes to your reporting.

— Jeaniene Frost
11:59 am January 29th, 2008

[…] Cover Debate — Covered Here’s what Jane Henderson is looking for: What reminds me of Hamilton’s series is the monotone, shadowy picture of a young woman’s body, […]

— The Cover Debate — Covered « Urban Fantasy Land
3:09 pm January 29th, 2008

davinci bridal…

I love posting comments to websites like yours; this is one that I’ll bookmark for future visits. I’ll be looking for some creative future content, and I’ll pass you along to friends and others!…

— davinci bridal
11:20 pm May 28th, 2008