Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
07.08.2009 6:06 pm

Survey: We still want bigger houses, with less money down

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

The housing collapse appears to have done little to change the preferences of home buyers. We still want more house, without paying a lot up front.

Those are the findings of a new survey out this week from Zillow. The housing website commissioned Harris Interactive to run a poll on buyer sentiment, surveying people who plan to buy in the next two years. Some things, they found, never change.

The most popular reason to buy was “I want/need a bigger house.” 55 percent of respondents said that was a motivating factor. Second was affordability. 44 percent said: “Home prices are currently at a level I can afford.” Another 34 percent pointed to low mortgage rates. 20 percent said the first-time homebuyer tax credit was a factor and 17 percent pointed to the opportunity to buy a foreclosed or distressed home. Despite lots of talk about downsizing Baby Boomers, only 5 percent said they’d buy because they wanted a smaller home.

More than half - 59 percent - plan to be in their homes less than 10 years. 8 percent think they’ll buy for life, or at least 31 years or more.

And, despite the wave of subprime lending that has swamped the economy, 17 percent of buyers said they still plan to put no money down on a home purchase (the survey’s most surprising finding, according to Zillow). Another 36 percent plan to put 10 percent or less down. On the flip side, 22 percent plan to pay more than one-fifth of a home’s cost up front.

Anyway, check out the survey, and some commentary from Zillow, here.

P.S. Are you on Twitter? We are. Keep up with the latest in St. Louis area real estate and development by following here.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
8 comments

Comments are closed.

I believe that A certain percentage of cost should be a requirement for a home loan. If you can’t save a down payment, you probably lack the self-discipline to keep a house up.

— tictac
4:24 am July 9th, 2009

tictac, I’m with you. A home buyer with no down payment and a buying price that is more than they can afford to pay is a big reason why the housing market is the way it is. Sure, we can blame those banks for approving subprime loans also, but everyone needs to stop being spoon-fed and start taking on some personal responsibility.

— southside20
7:31 am July 9th, 2009

The idea of a down payment is a joke in the first place. What do you think the real reason for it is? This survey did not also take into account that people are probably in homes that were built in the 40s/50s (housing boom) and just two small to begin with. To all homeowners: make that 13th payment each year so your loan will be paid in half the time. A 30 year loan will be paid off in 15 years, if you make just one extra payment each year. Dont give the bank more money than you should.

— Super Mario
7:33 am July 9th, 2009

It all comes down to skin in the game. If the buyer doesn’t have to put much or any skin in the game, they are obviously more likely to default on their loan than a person who puts down 20%. Ask a person who is trying to sell their home if they would personally give a person a loan with no money down and see what the answer is.

— Dan S
8:05 am July 9th, 2009

Super Mario, I’m assuming the 13th payment doesn’t need to be all at one time, such as paying 1/12 of a monthly payment each month in addition to your standard payment?

— NorCo
8:09 am July 9th, 2009

There is blame to go around for the current mess, lenders being to creative to get people to qualify, borrowers signing the dotted line knowing they were completely stretching their budget but I can tell you from being in the business not much has changed. Yes subprime loans are basically gone but the “new” subprime is FHA. Borrowers who don’t qualify for a conventional loan are being directed to FHA loans. I have denied many a FHA loan since the subprime colapse and they just shop until they find a FHA underwriter who will approve it. Real estate agents know which lenders and their underwriters are likely to approve a borrower who shouldn’t be given a loan. The real problem here is that FHA does not have enough manpower on the back end to regulate/monitor lenders and underwriters and the lenders know it and when FHA does find loans that should have not been approved the lender/underwriter generally just has their hands slapped and does not have their HUD approval pulled. FHA needs to really cracked down on poor underwriting or we will have another big mess in a short while but I suspect from what I am seeing and hearing it might already be too late.

As far as a “significant” downpayment being required to buy a house: that really does not translate into a good paying borrower. A good paying borrower is determined by the 4 “C’s” of underwriting I was taught over 17 years ago, credit, capacity, collateral and character. If all of those are fine then generally the loan will perform. Yes, things that cannot be predicted such as job loss, death, medical issues etc. occur and a loan can go bad but if the loan is underwritten properly delinquencies and foreclosures should only be around 1% of a lenders portfolio.

— sylvester
8:26 am July 9th, 2009

If you make a “13th” P&I payment every 12 months, you will pay off a 30-year mortgage in 22 years, not 15.

Here’s a tip for next time: Don’t take financial advice from video-game characters.

— lonelypedant
8:44 am July 9th, 2009

And in other news…

-’pretty’ people get more dates

- life is not fair

- Sun rises in the east

and ‘heat and humidity’… a big part of a St Louis summer!

**yawn**

— tsquare
9:31 am July 9th, 2009