Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
06.27.2008 5:32 am

A-B to cut $1B in ‘08, ‘09, offer buyouts, in plan to fend off InBev’s bid

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

One last update: In his closing words on the call, Busch said A-B will fight InBev’s lawsuit, filed Thursday, hoping to unseat board members.

 ”We will challenge InBev’s claim in their lawsuit that they can remove directors without cause,” Busch said.

************ 

There’d been some speculation in recent weeks that A-B might try to sell its amusement parks or bottling and packaging facilities as part of a restructuring. That’s not on the table, Busch and Baker just said. Given the market, and the company’s plans, they wouldn’t make enough money doing it.

“A sale after tax would not be of benefit to our shareholders,” Busch said.

They think the entertainment division will grow at least 9 percent each of the next few years, and exposes new customers to the Anheuser-Busch brand. And owning their own packaging plants helps the company keep costs in line.

“There’s no financial case for selling those two,” Baker said. “The value estimated in our plan is better than we’d get from selling them.

************ 

Now we’re in the question and answer part of the call, and analysts are trying to pin down Busch and Baker on A-B’s price. The executives are being cagy, not saying they won’t sell, but not naming a price, either.

 “We’re not putting a price on the company,” Baker said. “We’re outlining a case for you today on what our strategic plan can deliver and we’re quite optimistic that it will deliver greater value than the $65-a-share offer.”

When another analyst followed up with a question if the board is still willing to negotiate with InBev, Baker referred him to the statement issued yesterday, which says the board “will continue to consider any strategic alternatives that would be in the best interests of Anheuser-Busch shareholders.”

********** 

Baker and Busch both indicated that A-B is willing to continue talking with InBev, but said that the current offer “clearly undervalues” their company.

“Paying $65 a share would be an excellent deal for InBev shareholders,” Baker said. “But $65 a share is clearly inadequate and would represent a transfer in value from A-B shareholders to InBev shareholders.”

They both spoke several times about A-B’s “iconic” brands and dominant position in the profitable U.S. market as key assets that InBev was undervaluing.

 “Anheuser-Busch is a truly unique brewing asset and the acquisition of A-B would be unlike any other brewing acquisition given our iconic brands and our substantial market share in the most profitable beer market in the world,” Baker said.

Baker said the new strategic plan will give A-B “double-digit” earnings per share growth starting next year.

******* 

A-B will offer “early retirement packages to” some older employees in the third quarter, with the hopes that 10 to 15 of roughly 1,300 eligible employees take them, CFO Randy Baker just said. He gave few details, but indicated the company hopes to cut roughly $300 million in labor and selling/general/administrative costs.

It also plans to cut the costs of the goods it sells by roughly $700 million through efficiencies and through its supply chain.

******* 

More from Busch, on brands and on an expanded “Blue Ocean” cost-cutting plan.

“Our business is built on brands,” Busch said. “Our brands were built through years of investment and ingenuity,” he said. “Today we continue to increase the value of these brands through marketing and innovation.”

He also said the company will step up its “Blue Ocean” cost-cutting plan, which was planned to slice more than $400 million from the company’s spending over the next four years. Now, Busch said, the target will be “over $1 billion in savings, with the majority this year and next.”

They can do this, he said, because of the hard work of employees.

“Our more than 30,000 employees are truly acting like owners,” he said.

The company also expects to increase beer prices, gaining 4 percent per barrel this year and next.

***** 

In his opening statement, August Busch IV, Anheuser-Busch CEO, says InBev’s offer of $65 a share is too low, “too low relative to the value compared to other transactions in the beer industry and involving iconic brands.”

He also says the cost reductions planned by InBev at $65 a share “assume cost reductions Anheuser-Busch can achieve independently.”

Then he moved on to discuss the qualifications of the board, which includes current and former executives from companies like global companies like AT&T, IKON, JP Morgan.

“This is a board composed of some of America’s top business leaders,” he said.

For more details and background, here’s our story from this morning’s paper on yesterday’s announcement that it will turn down InBev’s $65-a-share takeover bid for the brewer.

Return to this blog to read highlights from the conference call. Or you can listen in to the call yourself by clicking here.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (10 votes, average: 4.6 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
23 comments

Comments are closed.

Good for them! Hopefully it works. Lights fight for A-B and our beer!

— Bob
8:23 am June 27th, 2008

Well I have supported AB standing their ground until now. It makes me angry that they will stick it to the little guy (workers)by laying them off, so they can keep daddy’s company that they did not safeguard. Remember AB what goes around, comes around.

— DG
8:33 am June 27th, 2008

This seems to be a dog and pony show, no real substance. As a stock holder when are these changes going to be implemented, and when can we expect to see the trading value to exceed $65 a share?
Again I love the statement that the $65 offer is “too low relative to the value compared to other transactions in the beer industry and involving iconic brands.” when the stock has not seen $55 or better in a long time.
I always go by the rule something is only worth what someone will pay for it, and prior to this offer that value was rather stagnant at around $50 a share.

— Andrew
8:38 am June 27th, 2008

what a bunch of double talk. wonder who wrote simpleton IV’s comments. looks like they are going to stick it to the rank and file just like all of you said inbev will do. the fat asses will keep their jobs.

— waldo
8:50 am June 27th, 2008

I work for AB and I am all for them doing anything to keep InBev out of the states. You think laying off a few people now is bad, wait until InBev gets here and decides that they really don’t want to keep the corp offices in St Louis and move them to the east coast. Yes the owners made a mistake to safeguarding the company, but again, wait until InBev takes over. All the people that said AB has ths coming will be crying in your foreign owned beer. If InBev takes over, that will leave Sam Adams as the largest US owned brewery…what a sad day that will be for America.

— Chris
8:58 am June 27th, 2008

If anyone thinks the Board or the Busch’s wont stick it to the worker or the shareholder to stay in control, or put dollars in their pockets are living in a fantasy land.
This just kicks off the who’s gonna buy AB sweepstakes, and InBev is the first contestant. I would guess that if InBev backs out the stock is going to crater, and it will end up with someone like Kirk Kerkorian or Carl Ichan owning it. Didnt St. Louis used to have a airline that Carl Ichan owned? how did that go………..

— Let the games begin
9:06 am June 27th, 2008

This was expected. InBev is now going the hostile route, which in all reality is going to make them show their true colors as to what the future of the AB brands will be.

One thing I find interesting though, since the rumors of the buy-out started the AB stock (NYSE: BUD) has jumped around the $62/share mark. But at the same time the InBev stock has dropped to $45/share on the Euromarket. They peaked at……. $65/share in 9/2007 and have yet to recover. For more fun facts, check the InBev total shares and market value (stock symbol INB).

— Sam
9:24 am June 27th, 2008

There are two factors at work here - a takeover bid by a potential foreign owner, and today’s market’s pulse. They’re not interdependent - AB, like most companies, will have to go on a diet or begin to drown. Just ask yourself who you would prefer to prescribe that diet - AB or InBev. Budweiser is iconic, even if not the best quality beer out there. What is the point of letting a Belgian company take it over if it’s not even going to be Belgian beer, anyway?

— Joseph
9:31 am June 27th, 2008

I think some of you are jumping the gun here… they don’t actually mention layoffs in this article and people are assuming… and we all know what assuming does. Sure they plan on cutting $300 million dollars in labor but notice that includes other costs as well. They may do some layoffs, but I don’t think it will be on any sort of grand scale as it would be with InBev taking over. Besides, regardless of whether InBev had made an offer or not, these cost cutting strategies needed to happen eventually to help keep the company profitable in the faltering American economy and dominant in the huge beer market. It’s business.

All-in-all, I think A-B is just pushing for a higher bid from InBev, not necessarily trying to fight out of it.

— Matt
9:37 am June 27th, 2008

The drop in stock value of a purchasing company usually does drop as the dividends will be lower in the short term as more profits go to pay for the purchase. So, short term investors dump and run.

We don’t get the full story here either from the board or the Post. My inside sources have told me there is much more going on then what they told stockholders, which really isn’t a surprise.

One thing I really find ironic is that a large number of shares of the stock is held by hedge funds (see your 401K), pension plans etc. They seem to be the ones who are really pushing to cash in (see no tax consequences). What I find ironic is that they depend on the working public to exist…lets force companies to lay off thousands of employees… seems like cutting your nose off to spite your face. The first lawsuit files was by a New Jersey Pension plan that represents union workers. Both those unions really look out for one another don’t they??? It all depends on whose ox is being gored.

— kdunlap
9:54 am June 27th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All