Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
10.23.2009 4:33 pm

Another DWI checkpoint planned in St. Charles County Saturday

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

Officers from the St. Charles County Sheriff’s Department, St. Peters Police Department and O’Fallon Police Department will man a “blood only, no-refusal” DWI checkpoint sometime Saturday.

O'Fallon, Mo., police officer Larry Blunt administers a field sobriety test at a checkpoint in St. Charles in April. | Elie Gardner, Post-Dispatch

O'Fallon, Mo., officer Larry Blunt administers a field sobriety test at a checkpoint in St. Charles in April. | Elie Gardner, Post-Dispatch

Fellow reporter Joel Currier tells me police are not releasing the time of day or specific location.

A “blood only, no-refusal” checkpoint means:

  • A driver suspected of drinking will be asked to perform field sobriety tests.
  • Drivers who fail the field sobriety tests will be asked to provide blood samples to test their blood-alcohol level. The legal limit in Missouri is 0.08 percent.
  • Drivers who refuse to submit to the blood tests will have their licenses suspended immediately, and officers will seek warrants to draw blood.

Officers also will look for other violations during the checkpoint. Typically, the checkpoints are paid for through state grant money. A deputy estimated that a recent checkpoint cost $1,000 to $2,000.

Checkpoints and stepped up traffic enforcement have received a lot of attention lately, particularly when officers added the “no-refusal” tactic for the first time this year.

I spoke in May with Chris Luebbert of the Missouri Department of Transportation’s Highway Safety Division. He said MoDOT received about $6 million in federal funding this year from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. That money can be spent on police and prosecutor training, equipment and enforcement efforts and public education campaigns.

Not every enforcement effort involves a checkpoint or road block. For example, the Missouri Highway Patrol had 14 troopers monitoring traffic on  Oct. 13 near Highway 40 and Callahan Road in St. Charles County. They stopped 65 vehicles between 6 a.m. and 2 p.m. and issued 63 summonses and 44 warnings.

Of the citations, 62 were for speeding and one was for failing to wear a seat belt.

The Highway Patrol stepped up enforcement in St. Charles County again during an overnight operation on Oct. 17 and 18. That operation resulted in 48 stopped vehicles, six DWI arrests, 11 tickets for speeding, eight tickets for driver’s license violations and five seat belt violations.

The most recent checkpoint in St. Charles County netted six arrests out of 2,020 vehicles stopped.

Both types of increased traffic enforcement have drawn critics and supporters. Some say extra patrols are more effective and don’t force drivers who are obeying traffic laws to stop. Some say the checkpoints deter drunken drivers from getting behind the wheel.

Fatalities on Missouri roads dropped below 1,000 last year, but state officials have said they want the number to drop even lower. As of Oct. 19, 679 people had died in crashes, a 10.3 percent drop compared to the same time last year. Nationally, fatalities have dropped, too, although some experts attribute the drop to sour economic times.

So, here are a couple of polls — not scientific, of course — to see how our readers feel about the different types of enforcement efforts. Do you support both methods? Dislike both? Prefer one over the other? Vote, and let us know in the comments.

Checkpoints — Good Idea or Bad Idea?

View Results

Loading ... Loading …

Extra patrols — Good Idea or Bad Idea?

View Results

Loading ... Loading …
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
24 comments

Is this an every weekend affair now? I guess they bring in some good money. got a whopping 6 of them. I think they could catch six by just driving around patrolling as normal instead of causing traffic problems for everyone. Yavol

— larry
4:46 pm October 23rd, 2009

i dont care about these things anymore. i am offended that only 6 people out of over 2000 were arrested. doesnt seem worth the hassle to the other 1980 or so drivers who werent doing anything wrong

— steve
6:14 pm October 23rd, 2009

6 people out of 2000 stopped!? $1,000 to $2,000 for a check point? This estimate is only plus or minus 100%, maybe the officer should go into weather forecasting.

— volunteer2uch
9:07 am October 24th, 2009

scariest part of article?

“Officers also will look for other violations during the checkpoint”

Police can pull you over and justify it for any reason.

— Dan
9:17 am October 24th, 2009

volunteer - it’s not a good use of money to get 6 drunks off the road? Would it be a better use of money to have the county paying for the extra time it takes officers to investigate a fatal accident that they might have caused? Or would it be an better use of money to have the ambulance district pay the extra expense of airlifting them to a hospital where they would have to have doctors and nurses take time away from people who were sick so that they could operate on the person in the accident? How about those things being a good use of money?

— deadpoet
9:32 am October 24th, 2009

Hope everyone who works at the wineries and the bars in Defiance & Augusta have other employment plans

— Bud
9:37 am October 24th, 2009

The wineries have 7 weeks of peak season in the fall,the cop’s have 7 weeks of checkpoints those same 7 weeks,won’t have to worry next year after all the checkpoints there will be no wineries,who needed those 50-100 jobs

— Bud
9:48 am October 24th, 2009

Land of the free, whoever told you that is your enemy…….

— Dude
11:39 am October 24th, 2009

I don’t have a problem with the checkpoints. The fact that there were ‘only 6′ arrests is an indication that they have done a good job of communicating ahead of time that there was going to be checkpoints.

— barney
12:48 pm October 24th, 2009

Don’t misunderstand DUI, DWI is dumb. These extrraordinary measures to combat DUI are draconian. This is about public relations and money. The legal system is being battered in newspapers about repeat DUI, alleged DUI people given less punishment, etc. More importantly it is about money. Tax revenue is down, sales and property. Government budgets are full of holes and deficits. Government workers are not getting raises, some are getting pink slips. How do you generate more money? Through more fines from people. Was there this many DUI checkpoints two, three years ago when the economy was fine?

— Watchin.....Listening
8:39 am October 25th, 2009

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All