Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
08.27.2009 3:52 pm

St. Charles apartment plan moves forward as mayor returns legislation unsigned

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

(UPDATED)

St. Charles Mayor Patti York today returned unsigned two recently-passed ordinances allowing the construction of a controversial 252-unit, multi-building apartment complex near the Family Arena.

That means the bills will go into effect. The project, at the northern corner of the intersection of Arena Parkway and Friedens and South River roads, is one of the few building projects to come before local governments in St. Charles County during the current recession.

The project, which has been opposed for months by nearby residents fearing traffic congestion and the development’s density, was approved last week on a 6-4 vote by the City Council.

York

York

York, in an e-mail to Councilwoman Laurie Feldman, said she disagreed with critics’ concerns that the development “will bring all the problems” and hurt neighboring property values.

“It has not borne out to be true with the last apartment development we had in the city; the Boulders at Katy Trail,” the mayor said in the letter to Feldman, a leading opponent of the new project.

York pointed out that the Boulders units - also in the city’s south end - ”were so successful that they converted into condominiums.”

The new plan, by Michigan-based Edward Rose Properties, calls for three two-story buildings and 10 three-story buildings.

An earlier version of the proposal was narrowly rejected in April by the council. On that vote, five council members were in favor, four were against and one was absent. Six “yes” votes are needed for passage.

Timothy Huff, an attorney for nearby resident Cordelia Stumberg, had alleged in June that the changes in the plan proposed by the developer were not substantial enough to allow it to be voted on again in a one-year period.

He pointed out in a letter to city officials that a city ordinance prevents an application “or one substantially similar” from being reconsidered sooner than one year after a council decision.

Asked today if he would go to court using that argument in an attempt to block the project, Huff said he had yet to discuss that with his client.

York in the e-mail to Feldman, whose 3rd Ward includes the Rose Properties project site, didn’t explain why she let the legislation become law without her signature instead of simply signing the measures. Feldman had asked York to veto the project, the mayor said.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
5 comments

Comments are closed.

This council and Mayor are not a reflection of the city that just celebrated their 200 year anniversary. Congestion, water issues, crime and long term tax revenue were not considered…rather a short term view of revenue short falls was fixed. Hoosiers.

— RC
8:21 pm August 27th, 2009

…also, the City has approved this rezoning in a newly mapped Flood Zone per FEMA…nice one guys.

— RC
8:29 pm August 27th, 2009

This is probably a “tax” based decision. Apartment complexes today, typically house “undesirables”. The residents nearby (and their concerns) were cast off in favor of money…typical of politics today.

— A. Patriot
6:21 am August 28th, 2009

Just what St. Charles needs, more happy construction companies to donate cash to campaign funds.

— Enough
7:28 am August 28th, 2009

Wonder why the Mayor didn’t sign it???????????????????????????????

— RC
10:17 pm August 28th, 2009