Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.08.2008 6:49 am

Anglican identity is not merely cultural

Special to the Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

Last weekend I had the opportunity to worship at Christ Church Cathedral as part of the Flower Festival weekend. As the celebration of the Holy Eucharist came to a close, the presider, the Rt. Rev. George Wayne Smith, Bishop of Missouri, turned to the Most Rev. Daniel Deng Bul Yak, Archbishop of Sudan, and invited him to impart the final blessing on the congregation. The words he used to extend this invitation were something like, “Archbishop, my brother, would you bless us in the language of your birth?”

It was, for me, a powerful moment. The Archbishop spoke in what I am told was Dinka, an African language utterly unfamiliar to me (and, I would guess, to nearly everyone else in the Cathedral). And yet, at the moment when he raised his hand high to begin making the sign of the cross over us, every person in that church knew that we were being blessed “in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,” and it made no difference to us in what language the words were spoken. This was Anglicanism at its best: generous and welcoming, respectful of both liturgical tradition and cultural difference, joyfully making room at the table for all who feel called to respond to Christ’s invitation to reconciliation, fellowship, and transformation.

It was also a show of mutual respect Archbishop of Canterbury in Sudanand Christian charity between an American bishop and an African archbishop, something that news reports about the current state of the Anglican Communion might lead one to think would be impossible.

I bring this up in part because of the recent post on Faith and Cultural Identity by Sherry Tyree. In making the point that any religion that is used primarily to bolster cultural identity is doomed to failure, Ms. Tyree suggests that Anglicanism itself has failed, using the example of the shrinking attendance in the Church of England to support her claim. I would rather not re-fight the battles of the English Reformation by comparing and contrasting the way that politics, culture, and history have shaped both the Church of England and the Roman Catholic church, but I would like to clear up a little confusion that I think crept into the discussion due to her use of the word “Anglicanism.”

While the precipitous decline of church attendance in the United Kingdom (not to mention the decline of the faith in the rest of western Europe, including in countries where Roman Catholicism was the established church), is a sad and complex affair, it does not signal the failure of Anglicanism.

What needs to be made clear is that Anglicanism and the Church of England are not synonymous. This is not in any way intend to belittle the importance of the Church of England, but rather to explain that Anglicanism’s boundaries are not co-terminous with those of the British Isles.

Episcopalians, in the United States and elsewhere, are also Anglicans, both by virtue of our heritage (religious, not ethnic) and by the simple fact of being members of a church that is itself part of the Anglican Communion. The Anglican Communion is comprised of “over 80 million members in 44 regional and national member churches around the globe in over 160 countries,” according to its website. All of us who worship within this tradition are, in some sense, engaging in and with Anglicanism.

Anglicanism faces a number of challenges today. Culture and theology, as well as biblical interpretation and perhaps even in a lesser way national identity are all at play in the conflicts within the Anglican Communion that have become so painfully public these last few years. But all of that is a topic for another time.

I hope to blog more about Anglican theology and what it means to me personally to be Anglican, but in the mean time, if you’re curious about the Episcopal Church you can’t go wrong by taking a look at the Book of Common Prayer, and perhaps even flipping through the catechism it contains. Or, better yet, stop by an Episcopal church this weekend and experience our worship and fellowship for yourself.

More important links:

For a good article on What it Means to be an Anglican

For more on the Archbishop of Sudan’s visit to St. Louis, read Tims Townsend’s article or the article on the Diocese of Missouri’s website

For information on a resolution supporting Sudan’s progress toward peace

Photo is of the Archbishop of Canterbury and others at the dedication and consecration of the Cathedral of St. Matthew of the Diocese of Renk in the Episcopal Church of Sudan.

4 comments

Comments are closed.

What a great piece and an eloquent description of our Anglican identity! Anglicans are certainly not all white Englishmen. A majority of practicing Anglicans are people of color, and people from cultures and ways of life that are very different from England or America. If I were not an Anglican, after reading your article, I would consider visiting an Episcopal congregation.

— The Rev. Mifflin Dove Jr.
9:09 am May 8th, 2008

“Different is not Deficient” is a very appropriate truth concerning Christian religions that follow the teachings of Christ.

We should all be able to embrace and not be bothered by our differences. The only important factor is that Christians are all one in Christ. This must be true of all Christians according to scripture.

— D. Walker
2:54 pm May 8th, 2008

I pray daily for the unity of the Church, indeed the unity of all people everywhere. At the same time, I recognize that there are differences between our denominations, and that we can only truly engage with one another when we are honest and transparent about who and where and what we are, here and now.

My point in this post was not to explain why Anglicanism is better than any other way of following Christ, but rather to clear up what I think are some widely held misunderstandings about what Anglicanism is.

— Pamela Dolan
9:29 am May 9th, 2008

What I think this post so wonderfully expresses is Christianity’s cultural impulse toward the “vernacular,” that people down through history have been able to hear Good News in their own language. And, vice versa, can feel God’s presence spoken in the blessing of another’s language. I wish I could have been there if only to hear that moment of benediction in Dinka. Coincidentally, one of the most poignant moments of my ordination was when one of clergy there laid his hands on me and pronounced blessing in his native Spanish.

This to me is the church’s greatest cultural strength, where one’s own language is never seen as a barrier to faith, nor to God. Matter of fact, it is an acknowledgment that God is revealed in every language, and all our speaking holds the possibility to reveal God to another. How fitting to read about it in the week before the festival of Pentecost. Thanks, Pamela!

— Travis Scholl
3:09 pm May 9th, 2008