Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.12.2008 10:03 am

Defining Motherhood — a Latter-day Saint (LDS)view

SPECIAL TO THE POST-DISPATCH

I work in a furniture store. This past weekend we were giving mothers flowers in celebration of Mother’s Day. I am sure our approach would make Anna Jarvis spin in her grave, as Khaled Hamid pointed out in his post.

Our sales team discussed how we might present these flowers. The question was asked: “How do we know who is a mother?”

My first thought was “every woman is a mother“, so naturally every female customer should get a flower.

But the consensus of the sales team was that a mother is someone who has children and therefore we needed to delicately determine what female customers were eligible for our flowers.

While the sales team defined mothers as those women with children, I saw a larger vision of motherhood as informed by my faith. Maybe a vision that goes beyond the definition as presented by the founder of Mother’s Day. And one that escaped a customer in my store who refused my offer of a flower because, as she said, “I don’t have children, so I am not a mother.” I respected her position, but I felt sad because in my heart of heart I believe she is a mother.

 In church yesterday, I heard a talk by Doug Adolphson — a lay member — who said: “The doctrine of motherhood applies to all women, not only those who have had children. Motherhood started back in the Garden of Eden when God created Eve.” 

Adolphson quoted a Latter-day Saint scripture that reveals much about our concept of motherhood.

Moses 4:26 says, “And Adam called his wife’s name Eve, because she was the mother of all living; for thus have I, the Lord God, called the first of all women, which are many.”

Adolphson went on to say, “both Adam and God refer to Eve as ‘mother’ before she ever had children.”

Then he quoted a respected former woman leader in our church, Sheri Dew — who happens to be single, never married – : “motherhood began before we were born.” She explained what LDS believe, that women were “endowed pre-mortally with the privilege and responsibility of motherhood.”

Brother Adolphson noted, “we can see that motherhood is more than just bearing children, though I don’t want to take anything away from that sacred part of motherhood…I hope we understand that the traits and qualities of motherhood can be exemplified by all women, regardless of their marital status or how many children they have.”

I believe what God taught us about Eve, the mother of all living, is instructional for us all. Women are daughters of God, with the special role to nurture, love and serve their families and a world in much need of a mother’s touch. And as a Christian, I believe mothers can do much to bring children to Christ.

As vital as mothers are, the role of women as mothers is increasingly being demeaned, limited and misunderstood.

As an example, Brother Adolphson shared: “I was particularly disturbed this week by a commercial advertising Mother’s Day flowers when it said to get flowers for that special someone, ‘him’ or ‘her’ .”

I find it increasingly uncomfortable to talk about the role of motherhood. I am attacked as being un-PC, ill-informed or bigoted. Yet what is to come of a society that does not celebrate and support the role of women as mothers? Will our young girls and young women as a result of a watered-down or limited definition offered them not fully realize their potential? What are we communicating about motherhood?

What if all women were to realize and internalize their role as mothers – the ennobling traits and responsibilities that brings to bless lives. I believe it would be the most empowering way to lift women and to lift the world.

I am a woman and therefore I am a mother.

Related link: Daughters of God, by Elder M. Russell Ballard

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (6 votes, average: 3.17 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
8 comments

Comments are closed.

Dana,

I am, admittedly, dense. What does “un-PC” mean?

— davel
10:35 am May 12th, 2008

Un PC is good.

It means you think for yourself.

You don’t follow the Politically correct group think.

Congratulations!

— Kathy
10:49 am May 12th, 2008

I enjoyed reading this. Thanks. I have a couple of questions.
In the same context can we say: I am a man and therefore I am a father?
Wouldn’t it be simpler, and more accurate to say that women have unique and wonderful traits simply as women? Why does their goodness need to be labeled mother traits?

— MMiles
12:27 pm May 12th, 2008

My guess, un-PC is ‘not Politically Correct’.

— Khaled Hamid
1:43 pm May 12th, 2008

Dana:
Nice post, but I disagree with the conclusion. This is not an issue of political correctness, but wouldn’t that assumption force women to play a role they may not want. I am sure some women may not want or unable to be mothers. Forcing a ‘mothers’ role on them is not correct, and unfair to at least some women.

— Khaled Hamid
2:03 pm May 12th, 2008

Khaled,
I believe that revering all women as people who CAN inherently nurture does not mean that they MUST do so.

— Tim Knell
2:33 pm May 12th, 2008

I wonder if the Adam & Eve story is enough of a reason to rigidly assign “mothering” traits like nurture and compassion to women, especially if the women in question aren’t taking on the role of mother. My husband is as involved in raising our children as I am; we do parent differently, but I can’t claim to be more nurturing or loving than he is.

That doesn’t mean that there’s nothing special about being a mother–having daughters, especially, I recognize that I’m a role model for their ideas of womanhood and femininity. I also realize that sometimes the only answer to a childhood crisis is a good cry and a cuddle in mommy’s lap. One of my girls has said she doesn’t want children when she grows up. I don’t take it personally: I felt the same way at her age, so she is mirroring me more accurately than she knows!

More food for thought: many medieval mystics recognized in Christ himself aspects of being that were consonant with their idea of mothering, and there was nothing feminist or PC in their meditations on Jesus as mother. Thank you for the interesting post.

— Pamela Dolan
3:24 pm May 12th, 2008

Khaled,

Thank you for the “un-PC” clarification, Now I know what I am. It might be a good logo for a T shirt.

— davel
8:42 am May 13th, 2008