Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
03.27.2009 12:50 pm

Low recidivism…in good ol’ Missouri

SPECIAL TO THE POST-DISPATCH
  • Email this
  • Print this

I read this piece today in the New York Times. It seems there is a “Missouri Model” of juvenile justice that is getting attention for good results.

VonErrick celebrated his 14th birthday last year by committing a daylight carjacking, beating the driver to the ground. With a long record of truancy, assault, and breaking and entering, he was sent to a state group home - the same home that his two older brothers passed through after their own scrapes with the law.

Both of those brothers are out now. Tory, 16, has A grades and plans to attend college. Terry, 20, has a job and has had a clean record for four years. VonErrick was recently released and immediately started high school.

The brothers say they benefited from confinement in the Missouri juvenile system, which emphasizes rehabilitation in small groups, constant therapeutic interventions and minimal force.

Juvenile justice experts across the nation say that the approach, known as the Missouri Model, is one of several promising reform movements that strapped states are trying to reduce the costly confinement of youths. California, which spends more than $200,000 a year on each incarcerated juvenile, reallocated $93 million in prison expenses by reducing state confinement.

There is no barbed wire around facilities like Missouri Hills, on the outskirts of St. Louis. No more than 10 youths and 2 adults called facilitators live in cottage-style dormitories in a wooded setting, a far cry from the quasi penitentiaries in other states. When someone becomes unruly, the other youths are trained to talk him down. Perhaps most impressive, Missouri has one of the lowest recidivism rates in the country.

5 comments

Comments are closed.

Thanks for the heads up. It is refreshing to get news like this.

— revdaniel
2:53 pm March 27th, 2009

Self Serving statistics are worthless.

— johnh
2:10 am March 28th, 2009

Au contraire, johnh, self-serving statistics are valuable elements of non-partisan debate, challenging those holding an opposing position to provide similarly fact-based arguments for their own positions.

Now, self-serving polls are some of the most despicable means of misleading argument and are less than worthless, bringing a negative effect to honest debate.

Do you find something about a low recidivism rate to be undesirable?

— TomUC
2:05 pm March 28th, 2009

For more information, see this interesting article by Ellen Perlman:

http://www.governing.com/archive/2006/jan/juvenile.txt

— davel
11:16 pm March 28th, 2009

I’m skeptical of this report for several reasons:
1. I know many St. Louis city police officers, and have heard their complaints of our juvenile system.
2. I’ve worked in schools with (juvenile) repeat offenders.
3. And I’ve been the victim of a felony perpetrated by a juvenile, who got nothing more than a slap on the wrist.
4. The propensity for statistics to be distorted.

It may very well be that this particular program is good and successful, but the juvenile system in Missouri is still VERY broken, and far from being a laudable model.

— Greg
8:30 am March 30th, 2009