Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
06.25.2008 6:23 am

Christians and Muslims agree on Peace and Justice principles

  • Email this
  • Print this

religion-war.jpg

Earlier in June, two dozen Roman Catholic and Muslim scholars met in Rome to discuss the theme “Christians and Muslims as witnesses of the God of Justice, of Peace and of Compassion in a World suffering from Violence.” Pope Benedict XVI personally visited the meeting to highlight its significance. While such interreligious dialogues seem groundbreaking these days, this meeting was actually the 14th annual meeting between the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue and the The Islamic-Catholic liaison Committee.

Rev. Dr. Frederic Ntedika Mvumbi, OP, one of my Dominican brothers from the Congo who teaches Islam in a Catholic seminary in Nairobi, Kenya, was fortunate enough to be one of the participants, and sent a personal report. In it he said that “a common understanding of these issues was found, though with difficulty, and an appeal was made to commit ourselves to it:”

  1. The inherent dignity of each human being, from which stem universal rights and duties, should be reaffirmed.
  2. Justice is a priority in our world. Justice requires, beyond the implementation of the existing legal framework and provisions, respect for the fundamental needs of individuals and people through love and solidarity. There can be no true and lasting pace without justice.
  3. Peace is a gift from God. It demands great commitment of all human beings, particularly believers who are called to be witnesses of God’s peace in a world of multiple forms of violence.
  4. Christians and Muslims recognize God as Compassionate and therefore are called to show compassion in treating every person, especially the needy and the weak.
  5. We believe that religions, if lived authentically, can effectively promote brotherhood and harmony of the human dignity.

At first glance, these assertions seem rather safe, but if we look a bit closer, they represent a real step forward in Christians’ ability to work together with Muslims for the sake of creating a better, more peaceful world. For instance, in number 1. To have religious leaders agree that universal rights and duties are based on the inherent dignity of every human person makes it much easier to find common ground about what these rights and duties might be compared to basing them on the Bible or the Qur’an. While it does not necessarily affirm the specific rights found in the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it does affirm the validity and basis for such a universal document.

More importantly, numbers 3 and 5 combine to point the way forward in forging a better world. If peace is a gift from God, then it cannot be achieved through merely “secular” principles. Thus, religions are an essential part of the solution to wars and injustice in the world. The document does not specify whether all religions promote peace, but we can certainly assume that the list includes Christianity and Islam. Thus, contrary to what we might assume hearing American political rhetoric and news stories, Islam is proclaimed as a religion of peace by these Roman Catholic leaders. What the world needs is for Muslims to be more faithful to their religion, not less.

I can affirm this as true. Can you?

8 comments

Comments are closed.

Point #2: Justice is defined completely different between the two religions. Who’s definition are we supposed to be using?

Point #4: The Islam God and the Christian God differ on compassion as well.

As is the case with every religion that is based on a sacred text, interpretation is the key. It’s not what it says, it’s what you THINK it says…

These interfaith dialougues are a good idea in principle, but the reality of the faiths is that there are differences. Even though most of them are minor it is enough to act as a canyon between them and that is never going to change.

— Tim
9:39 am June 25th, 2008

I would wholeheartedly agree with this sentence: “What the world needs is for Muslims to be more faithful to their religion, not less”. And, I would suggest, one could substitute Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, and all the rest in that statement.

— hs
4:33 pm June 25th, 2008

Response to Tim:

“Point #2: Justice is defined completely different between the two religions. Who’s definition are we supposed to be using?”

Exactly! If I stick to my revelation and you to yours, our answers to this question are likely to be quite different. especially, as you add, when we are really sticking to our INTERPRETATION of revelation. But if we choose something outside our revelations that we can both look at, such as human nature and its dignity, perhaps we can come to some better common understandings. Likely we will still both hold human dignity for religious reasons (humans are made in the image of God, etc.), but once it is established, we could very well agree on what it means to be human and therefore agree on what facilitates human flourishing. Justice is simply one of the things required for human flourishing.

Also, you say “Even though most of them are minor it is enough to act as a canyon between them and that is never going to change.”

Yes, our differences sometimes act as a canyon separating us, but that does not mean that they always will. I have a very strong religious reason to believe that we can bridge these gaps eventually: I believe that God is truth itself, and truth, in the end, wins. Thus I am in no hurry to force and agreement or rush to a hasty compromise. I believe that if we sit down and converse, in truth, God will be there, and one day, in God’s good time, things will work themselves out.

— Scott Steinkerchner OP
4:53 pm June 25th, 2008

Let’s hope you are right Scott. Nothing would please me more.

— Tim
9:35 pm June 25th, 2008

The Roman Catholic church does not represent all Christian religions and it is not apparent that the Muslims in the conference included Shites. The heading “Christians and Muslims agree on Peace and Justice principles” is only, at best, half right.

Endeavors such as love, hope and faith spring from life and are charisms of individuals. Only these endeavors can bring about justice and peace and have universal application.

— davel
11:03 am July 3rd, 2008

In Response to Austin262,

I agree in your observation about the facts “on the ground” in Iraq. I am a member of a religious order (the Dominicans) that has been present in Iraq since 1262, but may soon have to leave. The fall of the regime of Sadam Hussein has brought untold grief to my Dominican brothers and sisters working in Iraq. But this is what is so incredible about the accord that I noted above.

If Muslims in Iraq and Christians in the USA lived by these principles, we could forge peace in Iraq.

So do we prophetically believe the Good News and take a step forward in faith, or do we continue the hatred and mistrust that has led us where we are today? This is my question and my challenge.

— Scott Steinkerchner OP
1:11 pm July 27th, 2008

Scott says:

“So do we prophetically believe the Good News and take a step forward in faith, or do we continue the hatred and mistrust that has led us where we are today? This is my question and my challenge.

muslims by the millions are streaming into Christian majority countries, and have been welcomed

the hatred is not coming from the nonmuslim communities where muslims have been welcomed and econolically supported

muslims are not being imprisoned because they carry a koran into Britain or France

it is Christians, Jews and Hindus who are being slaughtered, tortured, kidnapped and forceably converted to islam

and the muslim communities in the west? say nothing, except they want more accomodation, FOR THEMSELVES, in London, Paris and New York City

to teach us about islam. It’s called dawah, prostletizing, and that behavior would get a Christian killed in any muslim country

— austin262
7:18 pm July 27th, 2008

hs, is regettable poorly informed about islam

http://europenews.dk/en/node/12574

The assertion that Islam is a “religion of peace’ draws us, in particular, to the teaching of Islam on violent jihad. It is said by many Muslim apologists that the word “Islam’ itself means “peace’. However, it is widely accepted that this is misreading of the Arabic word, and that “Islam’ means “surrender’.

If there is any connection with “peace’ here, it is that “peace’ which comes from total surrender and slave-like servitude to an absolute deity as expressed in the Qur’an and Islamic traditions. The peace of Islam, therefore, is the peace and protection afforded to those who convert to Islam or in the case of Jews and Christians, those who accept a humiliating, second-class status in an Islamic society known as Dhimmitude.

The Qur’an

According to former professor of Islamic History at Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Mark Gabriel, “There are at least 114 verses in the Qur’an that speak of love, peace and forgiveness, especially in the Surah titled “The Heifer’”(Surah 2:62, 109).’ But Gabriel goes on to explain that in the light of the later verse found in Surah 9:5 (the “sword verse’), these former “tolerant’ verses have been abrogated or annulled. This is according to the Islamic teaching of naskh in which the later revelations of the Qur’an cancelled out the former verses wherever there is a contradiction. (Islam and Terrorism by Mark Gabriel)

— austin262
5:48 pm July 28th, 2008