Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
09.22.2008 4:55 pm

Post-Dispatch refuses to distribute DVD offensive to American Muslims

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

obession2.jpgDespite the perilous state of American newspapers, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch advertising department took an ethical stand and refused to distribute the DVD of a film that for two years has troubled American Muslims.

The film, called “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West,” was distributed to an estimated 28 million people via 70 American newspapers, primarily in states crucial to the coming presidential election. The only other newspaper reported to have refused the DVD was the News & Record in Greensboro, NC.

The Miami Herald reported that its own decision to distribute the DVD angered the Muslim community there:

We feel that it’s going to incite more hate and bigotry against our community,” said Altaf Ali, Florida chapter director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. The DVD does not do enough to differentiate between terrorists and mainstream Muslims, he said.

The Herald’s description of the DVD says it includes…

…montages of terrorist training camps and suicide bombers paired with narration by commentators such as Daniel Pipes, founder of the conservative Middle East Forum think tank. Many of the film’s pundits are known for controversial views on Islam. In one part of the DVD, clips of Muslim children being recruited as suicide bombers are interspersed with images of Nazis.

Jen Wood, the Post-Dispatch’s vice president of advertising, said her department received the request to include the DVD as an insert at the beginning of the summer. She said the advertiser provided the newspaper only with a trailer, and refused when Wood asked to see a copy of the entire film - something she described as “not an unusual request.”"I didn’t have enough information to make a decision, so I said ‘no thank you,’” said Wood. “It wasn’t clear what exact message they were trying to send.”

The Herald reported that the nonprofit Clarion Fund, which promotes “national security through education,” sent the DVD to 28 million households, “many in election swing states such as Florida, Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania.”

In Florida, the DVD was distributed in the Herald, the Orlando Sentinel, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, the St. Petersburg Times, the Florida Times-Union of Jacksonville and the News-Press of Fort Myers.

In October 2006 (another election year) I wrote a story about how besieged the St. Louis Muslim community was feeling- the worst, many told me, since just after Sept. 11, 2001. A St. Louis screening of the “Obesession” movie featured in that story:

At the end of August, a thousand people — about half of them Jewish and half Christian, according to organizers — attended a screening of the movie “Obsession: What the War on Terror is Really About” at the Frontenac Hilton Hotel. The group’s sponsors promoted the movie with a provocative billboard featuring a dark-skinned man whose head was wrapped in a kuffiyeh and the words, “Confessions of a Terrorist.”

The terrorist in question was Walid Shoebat, who said he was a former member of the Palestine Liberation Organization. Shoebat appeared in the hourlong movie and then spoke to the audience.

Muslims who were there said they were horrified by what they believed was the movie’s inference that Islam, terrorism and Nazism were one and the same, despite a disclaimer that ran at the beginning and end of the movie that said “most Muslims are peaceful and do not support terror.”

Far more upsetting, they said, was the reaction of the audience.

Writing in “The American Muslim” two weeks after the screening, [Sheila] Musaji said those Muslims who attended were “still experiencing physical and emotional distress primarily due to the positive reaction of the audience — including applause and standing ovations — and to some of the hateful comments we overheard from individuals sitting around us.”

Fatemeh Keshavarz, head of Washington University’s department of Asian and Near Eastern Languages, who was at the screening, said: “This was hate speech, pure and simple. … being in that room, I felt threatened.”

The movie was made by Honest Reporting, “a grass-roots movement dedicated to ensuring that Israel receives fair media coverage,” according to its website. Honest Reporting is an arm of Aish HaTorah, an orthodox Jewish education network based in Jerusalem.

Richard Senturia, executive director of Citizens for a Just and Lasting Peace in the Middle East, which co-sponsored the screening, said that the Muslims who attended “saw what they saw and heard what they heard. I’m not going to deny their feelings.”

Karen J. Aroesty, the Anti-Defamation League’s regional director for Missouri and Southern Illinois, was also in the “Obsession” audience and said she was disturbed by what she saw in the crowd’s reaction. She is now working with Muslims on an effort to re-screen “Obsession,” but this time to also provide a forum for people to discuss their feelings about the movie.

“Frankly, things are getting out of hand,” Aroesty said about the sequence of events that have frightened many St. Louis Muslims. “All these things happen, and they converge in different ways in a community like St. Louis.”

Wood said her department needs to have a full understanding of what is being advertised in the newspaper, otherwise, it “reserves the right” to decline an ad. “I exercised my right not to accept [the DVD],” she said.

88 comments

Comments are closed.

I guess that is not the same as when the Post ran an ad for the 7th Day Adventists during the Pope John Paul visit to St. Louis. In the ad they described the Pope as evil and Catholicism as a false religion.
It was bright yellow and the intent of the ad was to attract attention.
I would imagine that area Catholics were more than a little angry at the advertisement.

Double standard? Yes, indeed. Just not according to the Post Dispatch!

— midwest
12:29 pm September 23rd, 2008

The way I read this article, Jen Wood refused the DVD because the advertiser did not provide a complete version of the documentary for her to view. I think it perfectly understandable that she deny the advertisement if she doesn’t feel like she has enough information to fairly evaluate it.

— jfmoyn
1:37 pm September 23rd, 2008

“We feel that it’s going to incite more hate and bigotry against our community, said Altaf Ali, Florida chapter director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.”

How many hundreds of times have we heard that over the past 7 years? It’s almost like he’s reading from a script. Oh, wait. He is.

Funny how these supposed incitements regularly fail to occur. Speaking of which, how’s that FBI investigation into the alleged bomb threats at the Lemay mosque coming along?

“The DVD does not do enough to differentiate between terrorists and mainstream Muslims, he said.”

Um, Mr. Ali, you work for CAIR. Isn’t that your job?

I support completely the Post-Dispatch’s right to run whatever advertisements it sees fit. Just don’t insult reader’s intelligence by pretending it’s done for ethical reasons.

— Go_Fish
1:51 pm September 23rd, 2008

We’re talking about radical Islam, not Islam itself. Has the Post ever distributed movies on radical Christianity? I’m sure. We’re living in this ultra-sensitive, touchy-feely society now, and the truth gets silenced. Liberalism at its finest. Oh, and everyone: be sure NOT to wish your fellow Americans a “Merry Christmas” this year. It might offend a Muslim.

— Scott
1:53 pm September 23rd, 2008

These comments are very interesting and reflect the misguided views of the middle America. I too have seen the DVD and quite frankly, it was sickening.
It was as sickening as any of the anti-Semitic or anti-negro hate speech as I have ever heard (and still hear when some of you let your guard down!). You know what I am talking about!

Disclaimers in the movie! Are you guys serious? So can you call the Jews and African-Americans derogatory names in a movie and then have a disclaimer that “oh, we weren’t talking about you, just talking about the bad ones”.

The movie is patently inaccurate on a number of issues. No doubt the terrorists have killed more Muslims than ‘westerners’. Did you know that the number of civilians killed by the ‘west’ over the last 10 years is 100-1000 times higher than death toll in the west (you can look it up)?

It has become socially unacceptable to denigrate other minorities or religions. But America is starved for a nemesis so the Muslims have become the new Negroes and Jews and Islam, the new communism.

Did anyone wonder why was this movie made and distributed and by whom? Why is this a ‘free ad’ by a shady organization and not a rigorously vetted documentary by some respected journalist? It’s a sorry state of affairs when we have to rely on pure, free, hate materials as our source of “education”.

The Post-Dispatch showed some real strength in its character by taking an unpopular (but righteous) stance. This free hate speech has no place in America.
Congratulations, Tim!

— bmm
1:53 pm September 23rd, 2008

The Post-Dispatch do not set the freedom of speech-the people of this country do.The PD is trying to be so politcally correct that it is stiffling the voices of all that needs to be heard,aggreable,or not!

— steve665
1:56 pm September 23rd, 2008

“…the St. Louis Post-Dispatch advertising department took an ethical stand and refused to distribute the DVD of a film that for two years has troubled American Muslims.”

Since when is keeping the truth from your subscribers an ‘ethical stand? Can St. Louis Today no longer be trusted to give accurate information if someone might become offended by that information?

— Kevin
1:59 pm September 23rd, 2008

I apologize. I meant the Post-Dispatch, not St. Louis Today.

— Kevin
2:06 pm September 23rd, 2008

A response to — bmm
1:53 pm September 23rd, 2008

“The Post-Dispatch showed some real strength in its character by taking an unpopular (but righteous) stance. This free hate speech has no place in America. Congratulations, Tim!”

bmm…Read my comment @ 12:29

So tell me, how do you feel about the Seventh Day Adventists advertisement during the Pope’s visit? The Post has 2 sets of standards. One standard says it is okay to bash the ENTIRE Catholic religion and the other says it is NOT okay to criticise Muslim extremism.

— midwest
2:12 pm September 23rd, 2008

Thanks for bringing this to light Tim, otherwise we wouldn’t have known about it.

I can understand the trepidation by the Post for not wanting to publish this add, although the comments made before me about similiar things by anti-Pope groups and so forth ARE very relevant.

As to the terrorism-Islam connection: I’ve seen all kinds of press releases by Catholic groups criticizing the Church’s handling of child abuse by priests. I’ve seen all kinds of things published by Jewish groups critical of some Isreal actions in Palestine. Another embassy bombing last week and nothing. If Muslims don’t want this image then they have to fight it. Simply not talking about it will not make it go away.

Islam has a very violent and idological group in it that promotes this stuff. The rest of the religion needs to voice their displeasure…

— Tim
2:26 pm September 23rd, 2008

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 » Show All