Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
06.06.2008 1:12 pm

Latter-day Saints examine racial history

SPECIAL TO THE POST-DISPATCH

mormons_in_ghana_africa_31.jpg 

Tim Townsend’s article on Monday touched on a topic close to my heart, that is: the experience of black members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. To read his story, Black Mormons straddle two worlds on 30th anniversary click here.

I have to admit, Tim’s story, while balanced and refreshing, was also hard to read. Especially hard for me to read was a comment made by my friend, Latter-day Saint (Mormon) convert, Nekisha Rhodes who says she is “comfortable being uncomfortable” as she struggles to learn more about the heritage of her new-found faith, a heritage that includes a church policy, lifted 30 years ago, prohibiting black male members from the priesthood.

Nekisha sounds much like many African American Latter-day Saints when they candidly express their faith and experience in the church. Catherine Stokes, Latter-day Saint and former assistant director, Office of Health Care Regulation, for the Illinois Department of Public Health, said:

“When I joined the Church, most of my friends and acquaintances thought I had taken leave of my senses. Some early comments were, ‘I thought you were smart until you joined the Mormon Church.’ ‘Are you the only black member they have?’…Are there diverse opinions about race among members of the Church? Of course there are, and they run the spectrum. At the same time, there is a no more welcoming, loving, helping place…The commonality of membership in the Church brings an instant rapport and is a true expression of Christian love.” ( source: church public affairs pamphlet, 5/03, 36876)

While Nekisha’s statement reflects her determined faith and love for her new church home, I doubt many leaders of our church would read Nekisha’s statement and not feel anxiety or wonder how we can help her and others to feel more comfortable.

Have we fallen short?

Nekisha’s and others’ statements are evidence we can do more.

Have we come far in healing our hearts over the last 30 years?

Yes.

But my question is, if we don’t look back, how can we measure how far we have come?

So I appreciate that my church is sponsoring the June 8th commemoration of the priesthood being extended to all worthy males, that opened the priesthood not only to black men, but Temple worship and Temple marriage and mission service to black men and women.

I am also grateful for the pioneering work of Darius Gray and Margaret Young who have produced a film: Nobody Knows: The Untold Story of Black Mormons . It is a sensitive work that examines the black Latter-day Saints’ experience, past and present. Learn more and see the trailer — click here.

Opportunities to look back can help us answer questions about the past. Even more importantly, such moments inspire some searching questions: “what can be the experience of black members of the church going forward?”

The value of studying and celebrating history is in what it portends for the future. It’s no wonder that those who are “uncomfortable” — black and white — want to look back to find reconciliation.

The value of looking back was apparent to me as our city of St. Louis commemorated the 150th anniversary of the Dred Scott decision. The commemoration committee choose to focus not on the infamous Supreme Court decision exclusively, but also on the honorable lives of Dred and Harriet Scott.

I represent my church on the Friends of Dred Scott commemoration committee that recently successfully completed a year-long commemoration with institutions gathered in St. Louis and across the United States giving tribute to two humble itinerant slaves — Dred and Harriet Scott — unsung heroes, who sought to bring about freedom for their posterity by peacefully appealing for justice through the court system. Their faith in the system was dashed by the heavy-handed Supreme Court decision that denied their petition for freedom. The decision further divided the nation and ultimately led to civil war that, while tragic, resulted in uniting the nation on a corrected course, one we are continuing to align ourselves more perfectly with, as Senator Barack Obama has recently acknowledged in his speech: A More Perfect Union.

The year-long Dred Scott 150th commemoration ended with an unprecedented Gala gathering of the community represented by diverse Missouri institutions. The spirit of the evening is one I hope we can capture everyday in every institution and neighborhood. There was no “us and them” mentality, but rather a feeling of goodwill reflected in renewed spirited determination to live our lives as Dred and Harriet did, standing for truth and justice.

Despite such good outcomes resulting from celebrating the past, some would say we need to just move on, stop talking about issues of equality. There seems to be two camps, each camp made-up of whites and blacks and others, in and out of the faith. Those who want to talk and those who don’t.

Paul Sleet, president of the Pagedale branch of the Church in St. Louis, Missouri, quoted in Tim Townsend’s article, acknowledged that within our faith, “people don’t want to talk about it.”

Assuming the best of intentions, those who “don’t want to talk” often believe that by looking back we dredge up old wounds better left untouched. Or that by examining and celebrating ethnicity and equality we are in some way acknowledging differences and thereby we are not being color-blind. Still, others just don’t know how to talk about it.

At an anti-racism workshop I attended the speaker made a statement that has stayed with me and I believe to be true. He said: “race matters until race doesn’t matter.”

Latter-day Saints want to achieve a color-blind community of members, where we esteem each person a brother or sister regardless of ethnicity. Ahmad Corbitt, black church leader and director of the New York Public Affairs Office for the church, is often quoted as saying that our outreach in predominately black communities is NOT about affirmative action, but it is about being Christian, loving our neighbor. He makes a key point about our motivations.

So the question might be asked: Can we talk about the issues without causing the divide to be enlarged or the wounds to be reopened?

I believe we can.

Talking is important to build understanding. But talking about issues of race is not easy for the aforementioned concerns of those who are reticent to talk.

I appreciate the pioneering efforts of Latter-day Saints, Marvin Perkins and Darius Gray, who are working to make the dialog easier. Their four-part DVD presentation –Blacks in the Scriptures – takes us way back to examine issues of race and equality in the scriptures. They are making a difference for some in our community — Latter-day Saints and others — who have longed for a sensitive and Christ-centered focus on issues of race.

As passionate as I am about dialog, I believe talk should inspire action.

In the city of St. Louis we have much work to do — people of all faiths and backgrounds –to bring people together. It begins and ends at the grassroots level within all institutions and families to enlarge our circles of friends to include those who may be different from us.

Faith-based organizations are especially positioned well to bring about change, new attitudes and understanding driven by their doctrines centered in justice and mercy, and as Christians, centered on the atonement. And families are where we find our most important role models.

As our church commemorates June 8th, this is my hope: that the celebrations will open our hearts and minds to new understandings, that we will be better informed about the experiences of our neighbors –our brothers and our sisters — and that we’ll become more capable in our spheres of leadership and influence to be sensitive to others.

Then perhaps Nekisha will say, “I am comfortable, period.”

Above photo is of Latter-day Saints in Ghana, courtesy of Kevin Miller, see more photos at blacklds.org.

Related links:

A Need for Greater Kindness, speech addressing racism, by then, Church President, Gordon B. Hinckley given in April 2006.

Paul Sleet, President of Pagedale branch, of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints — blogs about his ministry in Pagedale, Missouri, and shares messages with his flock.

Ahmad Corbitt – New York stake president and public affairs director.

www.blacklds.org — a website in support of black Latter-day Saints

Nekisha Rhodes, St. Louis LDS gospel singer on You Tube singing for St. Louis organization Better Family Life’s Unity Ball.

Blacks in the Scriptures – resource for dialoguing about issues of race and equality in the Church.

Nobody Knows: the Story of Black Mormons — film that takes a sensitive and balanced look at the past and present lives of black Latter-day Saints.

Discover Your Roots Missouri, an African American Family History Conference based in St. Louis, Missouri, sponsored by the Lindell ward of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and other area institutions.

Black History Remembered – an initiative sponsored by the O’Fallon Illinois Stake of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and other other organizations to help youth commemorate the history in East St. Louis.

Darius Gray on Utah’s African-American Voices — discusses the Genesis Group, a church-spondored support group for black members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Genesis Group – church-sponsored support group for black LDS.

My Friend Nekisha – my story about friendship that crosses ethnic boundaries.

Alex Boye – black member of the Mormon Tabernacle Choir and Christian singer.

Gladys Knight and the Saints United Voices Choir – grammy award winning choir made-up of diverse Latter-day Saints.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
19 comments

Comments are closed.

When one take to heart Christ’s teachings concerning the need for His church and all things to be built upon a solid foundation. His wisdom in teaching us that when something is built on a faulty foundation, it will be shaky in all its ways and of no real value to Him, I can’t help but question all aspects of any religion that was built on such a faulty foundation of wrong and error in so many of its ways.

Due that such racist practices were taught by the Mormon church to its body without any shame and in obvious conflict with the Holy Scriptures, Christ teachings, I wonder how is it possible that such racist beliefs are not still ingrained in the brains of many Mormons, including its Black members feeling inferior due to the church’s past teachings that they are inferior etc…and not much being done even until this present day to acknowledge the grave error of the church’s ungodly and un-Christian teachings conerning people of African descent.

How does one reconcile the fact that one’s church was built upon such a foundation in conflict with the very foundation of Christ teachings?

— D. Walker
11:40 pm June 7th, 2008

Also this statement in the story highlighted is of great concern, stating:

On Sunday, the church will celebrate the 30th anniversary of what Mormons believe was a revelation from God that allowed blacks to become fully participating members. It will be the first time the church leadership sponsors a commemoration of the revelation in Salt Lake City’s Mormon Tabernacle..

———————————–

The church is still very much in error and appears unwilling to accept responsibilty for its error as proof by the statement:

“…Mormons believe was a revelation from God that allowed blacks to become fully participating members”.

This was God’s revelation Mormons think, that God 30 years ago told you that it was now okay to allow blacks to become fully participating members, but that God did not give the Mormon church the revelation that they were practicing grave sin and was in error of His will and Christ’s teachings? Very difficult to take the church serious that it has truly repented from their sins of racism.

— D. Walker
12:01 am June 8th, 2008

While racism is obviously not of God, what the poster D. Walker seems to be missing is that if you condemn the Mormons for being racist, then you must even more so condemn the Baptists, the Methodists, and many other American denominations. It wasn’t the Mormons singing hymns and giving sermons at the lynchings in the south. Clearly there have been racist Mormons and inappropriate things have been stated over the pulpit. Clearly, more could have been done. But, to condemn only the Mormons is to have a myopic world view.

Most black Americans still worship in mostly black churches. While other churches continue to struggle with how to integrate the races, the revelation on the priesthood caused the Mormons to give their full support to the cause. I am grateful that God still corrects man through revelation. I am grateful that some men still listen.

— Scott Gordon
2:41 am June 8th, 2008

The church led by the Apostle Peter was built on the foundation of Christ and His resurrection. Even so, Peter and other Christians needed time to overcome prejudice against Gentiles. Peter needed a vision to show him that Gentiles were not unclean. He then took the gospel to them.

The Mormon faith is built on the foundation of Jesus revealing Himself in modern and ancient America. A key teaching is that all people are God’s children. Blacks were part of the church from its beginnings in the 1830s. Some held the priesthood and Mormons were generally opposed to slavery. Please look at the History time line at http://www.blacklds.org to compare the Mormon dealings with race issues compared to other churches and the nation.

I wish changes had happened faster in various churches and in the nation. I am glad to see subtantial improvement in the Mormon community over the last thirty years.

— Chris Kite
9:51 am June 9th, 2008

Scott,

I condemm all racism within all churches. God’s church is no place for racism, nor the acceptance of sin period, it’s an abomination to God.

I am very aware of the racism in American churches. In fact, no one has done more research on the subject than Fredrick K.C. Price, PhD. in his series “Race, Religion and Racism.” I suggest that every American read, or watch on DVD the series.

The difference between these other churches that you mention and the Mormon church is that these other religions did not teach racism as part of the churches Christian foundation, but where racism showed its ugly face within the church due to the racism that resided within the hearts of the church’s members.

— D. Walker
12:40 pm June 9th, 2008

Mr. Gordon, the thing you fail to realize is that the racist in both the north and south did not do what they did because of their religious teaching, but because of societal mores which were in fact against their religious teachings as christians. As one blogger stated earlier, all are equal in the eyes of God.

— willys
12:45 pm June 9th, 2008

Chris Kite,

Notice that the old Saul who had those prejudices was not the one who took the message to the Gentiles, but not after the old Saul became the new, as Peter. Jesus gave Saul the vision and after Saul received the vision he became Peter taking the message of Jesus to the gentiles.

Real visions from Jesus we know from scripture do not conflict with His teachings as revealed in the Holy Scriptures. That is why it can be stated without any doubt that the Mormon church has been built on a very faulty foundation since the vision shown conflicted with the very basics of Jesus teachings.

For this reason it truly cannot be claimed that it was Jesus who revealed himself to your founder, Joseph Smith in America because we know through scripture that the Lord is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow, never changing, and this Jesus that supposedly revealed himself to Joseph Smith gave him a different gospel than the one we find in the Holy Scriptures.

I do not condemn the people of the Mormon church. But, I must as a Christian defend the teachings of Christ and speak up when I see error.

— D. Walker
1:15 pm June 9th, 2008

D. Walker - Saul became Paul, not Peter. Paul believed in taking the the gospel to the Gentiles before Peter. He did not rebel against Peter and start his own church. He respected Peter’s authority. eventually Peter caught the vision.

Many Mormons and Mormon leaders hoped and prayed for the priesthood ban to be lifted many years before it was. There were also early leaders who never wanted it put in place. It was difficult to accept because it goes against the key beliefs of Mormons that we are all children of God and the gospel should go to all His children.

As for other churches, I do not think the Bible motivated people to own slaves and be racist. People were motivated by greed and fear. Since the Bible was the standard for morality, people became selective and creative in using the Bible to defend slavery and racism.

— Chris Kite
9:19 pm June 9th, 2008

Got my names and story mixed up when you mentioned Peter’s vision, my mind for some reason went to Pauls vision on the road to Demascus.

Peter was still living under the Law in this area of his life, the practice of being ritually clean and the Jewish practice of being ritually clean that you are calling racism were not considered sin in God’s eyes or racism, but was required by God under Jewish Law. The practice was not required to be practiced under the New Law and Gentiles did not practice it.

God dealt with Peter concerning the fact that it was no longer a requirment to practice of being ritually clean, a practice which was still ingrained deep into Peter’s psyche. God dealt with this stumbling block of Peter’s through a vision, where Peter finally got it deep within his heart that Gentiles were nolonger considered unclean because of not practicing this Jewish ritual.

This is totally different from the Mormon church teachings of racism concerning African Americans within the Mormon church to its members. The Mormon church was built upon these types of errors that are in total conflict with the teachings of Jesus.

— D. Walker
12:33 am June 10th, 2008

Scott:

So, prior to the revalation from God, were blacks actually cursed? Did the church realize that it was wrong, or did it just say that God changed his mind?

You make a valid point about racism in the Baptist and other protestant churches. I condemn the people of those churches for that. It was never part of their official teachings, and they are on the whole repentant for those actions.

But the difference is that it seems that the Mormons seem to believe that the racist teachings were okay for their time, then God decided that they should change, so as a church, they believe they were always doing the right thing.

— Mike
9:15 am June 10th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All