Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
01.03.2009 3:17 pm

No Miles, No Fuentes. . . no help?

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

Cardinals manager Tony La Russa lamented the loss of Aaron Miles and even Brian Fuentes, whom the Cardinals actually never had. Some of you seem to agree, especially in the case of Miles. Now, what happens? You have questions. We’ll try to have some answers.

***

Q: Commish, I have been thinking for weeks about why Tony seemed so adamant to acquire a hard-throwing lefty out of the pen. Then it came to me. I remembered the “Nasty Boys.” I heard on the new MLB network Barry Larkin speaking about that bullpen of the 1990 Reds. Larkin said , “We knew every day that we were playing a six-inning game. If we had the lead after six, it was over.” Perez, Motte and Fuentes would have also been pretty nasty. This brings me to the question, what is happening with Tyler Johnson? If he could be almost what he was he could be that third piece of nasty. Thanks, Mr. Hummel.

Roger

A: Tyler Johnson still is on the 40-man roster but is recovering from elbow surgery of last spring. He probably won’t be ready until some time early in the season. But I wouldn’t reject him down the line if he can throw as he did in 2006.

***

Q: Dear Commish, II know that the Cardinals need to strengthen the left side of their bullpen.
Why haven’t they made a run at free agent Joe Beimel?  His numbers seem to make him one of the most attractive lefties on the market.
Is there something about his make-up or clubhouse demeanor that is making the Redbirds stay away?
Thanks,
Michael Stone
A: I’ve heard nothing untoward about Beimel’s character. I guess the Cardinals’ interest in Beimel doesn’t work into their financial structure. At least not right now.
***
Q: Hey Rick, Happy New Year. So far, it ain’t started too good for us fans. Can you tell me why we let Felipe Lopez sign with Arizona for a one-year contract? Didn’t our GM even explore the possibility of us re-signing him. So we let go the guy (Lopez) most of us wanted so that we could keep a guy (Kennedy) who most of wanted to see go.
And now we lose Miles who, I think, should have been starting at second last year before we got Lopez. Also where is the pitching help? Trever Miller? Come on. He may be a good pick-up for us but we need more than him. Miles a Cub? Say it ain’t so, John.
Seems like we could be getting worse.
Doug
A: The Lopez path is interesting. Apparently, early in the off-season, Lopez wanted a multi-year contract which the Cardinals didn’t want to give him.  In the meantime, they had been trying to trade Kennedy, per his request, but nobody wanted to take on the whole $4 million he is owed this year.  So the Cardinals decided to keep him. If they had known Lopez might sign for one year in the first place, they might have gone in that direction. But by the time that became clear, they had committed to keeping Kennedy as their second baseman. As for Miles, they didn’t want to pay him $2.5 million or so to be a backup, which, right or wrong, they determined that he was.
***
Q:With the big-time free agents (Sabathia, Texieira, Burnett, K-Rod, Fuentes) off the market, it seems to me like it won’t be long before the next tier of players is signed.  With plenty of quality players still available and the market favoring those clubs with a little money to spend, who specifically are the Cards targeting at this point?
Thanks again for your insight,
Andy

A: If they could get the likes of Randy Wolf or Oliver Perez for a two-year contract, they would be interested in that. But the starting pitching market, while still relatively deep, won’t shake out more until Derek Lowe, who is the at the top of the list, decides what to do with his offer from the Mets.

***

Q: Rick - Fuentes signs with LAA for $17.5 for two years and a club option for a third.  Miles goes to ChiCubs for just a bit more than the Cards would give him.  Lopez is let go and signs for a reasonable amount out west.  What’s the real deal here?  Is Mo outright lying to us or is he just incompetent?

Kevin

A: Here’s how I see this. Fuentes didn’t want to play here if the Angels made him an offer, so there wasn’t much John Mozeliak could do about that. No question Miles would be a valuable re-sign and he will be missed, but the Cardinals refuse to pay their backups starter-type money. Now, should Miles not be considered a backup? That is another question. His bat says he is a regular. His defense  is modest at best but he has shown himself to be a winning player. If Lopez had agreed to a one-year deal with the Cardinals before exploring other options, the Cardinals still would have him. Timing was everything here. By the time Lopez signed for one year, the Cardinals, who apparently hadn’t heard that kind of talk from his agent before, were too late.

***

Q: Hi Commish,  Happy New Year. Is there any news on Jamie Garcia and how he is recovering from surgery?  I thought, considering he was hurt, that he had some gutty performances during his callup. And do you think the signing of Miles by the Cubs causes us to look at bringing Barden up?  He played well at AAA last year and could cover all the infield positions too. What do you think of him as a player?

Dennis

A: Garcia had elbow surgery and likely will be out till the last part of the 2009 season. Barden hasn’t been given much of a sniff in his call-ups the last two years but he showed himself to be both an accomplished hitter and defensive player at Class AAA Memphis and for the Olympic team. If he doesn’t get a chance this spring, this means the Cardinals never really have  liked him.

***

Q: The very best of the New Year, Mr. Commish: I am really sore that the Cubs signed Aaron Miles and Fuentes went to the Angels.  One expected, the other a complete surprise.  I have watched my beloved Redbirds skimp on second basemen for years.  Time for that to end.  I like and am comfortable with Adam Kennedy, and I think he’ll have a great year, but be injured.   Does that now open a spot for Brendan Ryan and get him out of Tony’s doghouse?
Secondly, I’m happy that Fuentes went away.  He’s not the kind of guy I’d want on the Birds.  I know that Mo and Dunc will be creative finding a guy to close, but they had better do it soon.  If we wait to June, we’ll be watching everyone else win.  So what do you think about a closer, disregarding the two rookies?  Last, since we’re not trading for a regular second baseman, who do you think would make a equal or better replacement for Mr. Miles?  It is so disconcerting seeing so may Cardinals needs just six weeks before spring training.
All the best,
Thom

A: Thanks, Thom. I’m not that concerned yet because I foresee much more player movement among teams this spring than in most other seasons. Yes, Brendan Ryan has another chance to play himself back into favor. If he does, he well could be Mr. Miles’ replacement. The next closer? I must admit I don’t know who that is.

***

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (12 votes, average: 3.58 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
12 comments

Comments are closed.

I’m sorry, Commish, but Miles bat says he is a regular? What am I missing? He had an okay year last year and occasionally hits for a decent average but before ‘08 his numbers are awful:

2007: .676 OPS
2006: .671 OPS
2005: .661 OPS (and these two years were in
2004: .697 OPS Colorado!)

And I have a hard time believing that at age 32 he’s suddenly learned how to hit. Last year was a fluke.

And on top of that by all defensive metrics he’s a lousy shortstop and a below average second baseman. So you have a middle infielder who can’t hit and can’t play defense. But I guess he is “scrappy”. And a “gamer”. A “winner”.

It’s also worth pointing out that the Cards did not lose every one of those 31 blown saves. They’re record when blowing a save was 13-18. 31 blown saves is way too many to be sure, but the Cards have younger, cheaper options in Perez and Motte. Will they blow some games too? Probably. But at some point you’ve got to give the kids a chance. This is the whole point of having a renewable talent base. You can’t trade ‘em off forever.

— bassi
8:30 am January 5th, 2009

The ever-evolving off-season strategy for the Cardinals has to be frustrating as heck for TLR, not to mention us fans. First, Mo tells us that we’re going to be players and we go out and make a couple of deals, albeit small, right away. Things looked promising. Then, we hear that we are going to take a wait and see approach to see how the market develops. Now, it appears that we are going to wait to see where everyone goes, and then determine how we’re going to piece together a team.

I’ve been happy that Mo has made offers to guys like Fuentes, however I get the feeling that he shows his hand to early. It seems like we start the bidding with our highest offer. When players balk at it, we drop out of the running. I didn’t personally care if we got Fuentes or not, but if he was truely the top priority, then you do what it takes to land him. If there wasn’t a real possibility of landing him, then you’ve made a bad choice for your top priority. I was more upset by losing Lopez and Miles. I would have been ecstatic if we could have made a move to get DeRosa from the Cubs. It would be amazing to get offensive production from your second baseman. We try to fill ours with a number 9 hitter. I would have loved to see the Cardinals give Brad Penny the $5 million he got from the Red Sox, which was viewed as a minor deal by most. That would have made the front page here.

Last year, I bought two Pujols packs. This year, I’m taking the wait and see approach. I’ll wait and see if any freebies come my way, otherwise, I’ll buy tickets for a game or two.

— Bob
10:06 am January 5th, 2009

Pages: « 1 [2] Show All