Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
12.08.2008 8:24 pm

Mozeliak: Cardinals not courting free-agent A.J. Burnett

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

LAS VEGAS — While pitching remains his main target as the Baseball Winter Meetings opened today at the Bellagio, St. Louis Cardinals general manager John Mozeliak shot down the idea that he was going big-game hunting, and that included any pursuit of A.J. Burnett, reported or otherwise.

“I don’t know where that started,” Mozeliak said. “We never engaged in him.”

Mozeliak met with a small group of local media this evening at the Cardinals’ suite at the Bellagio, giving us a rundown of his first day of business at the annual swapmeet and trade show. Mozeliak said he met with a “handful of agents” and a “handful of teams” and was “equally active” with both. He described the first day as a continuation of the past weeks, distilled into a few hours of talks that could lead in the coming days to deals.

He covets pitching. But with specific parameters.

The chief reason the Cardinals have not “engaged” in the derby for Burnett, as was reported in this morning’s Post-Dispatch, is the length of the contract such a pitcher would command. The Cardinals had a similar reservation when exploring a deal with San Diego for ace Jake Peavy. The Cardinals have three pitchers signed to long-term deals — Chris Carpenter, Adam Wainwright and Kyle Lohse. Mozeliak said the way the team is currently built prohibits him from adding another long-term deal to the rotation without painting the payroll into a difficult corner in the third and fourth year of that contract.

“Adding a fourth,” he said, “I don’t think that makes sense.”

The Cardinals would prefer to get a starter on a short-term, possibly two-year deal.

Mozeliak did not rule out the possibility of moving one of his outfielders because it where “we have depth.” He also said the Cardinals have virtually exhausted all avenues for dealing Adam Kennedy and that the presence of Kennedy on the roster may make it difficult to resign Felipe Lopez.

Mozeliak said the pitcher he’s after could be a starter or, if the opportunity is there, a closer.

“A lot of this is timing,” Mozeliak said of how his rotation is structured with three pitchers signed through 2011, and potentially (with options) beyond. “It’s hard to engage in us landing that type of pitcher (top-end starter). That’s not the most popular thing to hear. The way we put our club together we’re not going to be able to have four starting pitchers with long-term contracts.”

-30-

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (10 votes, average: 4.2 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
17 comments

Comments are closed.

I think they could be fine w/ 1 more serviceable starter & another Left Hander. Go into the season w/ closer-by-committee & have Miles and Greene up the middle. We’re in good shape!

— Chris Hosto
11:17 pm December 8th, 2008

After building the new ballpark, did the Cardinal front office not say that they now had money to spend but the free agent market was not a strong one so they would not spend the money to just spend it, instead they would put it aside for the following year when better free agents would become available. Isn’t it about time they follow through on that promise and get us some players. How can the Cubs spend, spend, spend and still have enough to take on a Jake Peavey. It’s getting old.

— Cards65
11:53 pm December 8th, 2008

Burnett would be a huge, huge mistake. A guy with a bad injury history wanting five years? Yikes.

There’s plenty of good, solid starters out there in the free agent market who could be had on, at most, a 3-year deal–Garland, Byrd, Penny, Perez, the other Perez, to name a few. The rotation needs some stability that pushes Pinero to the fifth spot, allows them not to count on Carpenter, and let the prospects develop further/get healthy, and it should allow them enough salary space to lock up at least one more reliever. Apparently, that’s what’s Mozeliak is looking for, and that’s good for the Cardinals.

— Forsch31
12:13 am December 9th, 2008

Some of you people are just dumb.

Does it register in your brains that extending guys like Lohse, Wainwright, Molina, and down the road - Ludwick/Ankiel, and oh yeah a certain MVP, is not free? A couple years ago, people were freaking out in this city when the Cardinals “missed out” on Jason Schmidt. Same thing for about a decade ago when Mike Hampton signed with the Rockies. Is it really better to fall into the grass-is-always-greener trap of signing players from elsewhere? Or, is it better to smartly spend and develop guys, and then when prospects become all-stars spend money on your people instead of looking elsewhere for a more expensive, often risky alternative? You tell me - right now: Schmidt and Hampton or Wainwright and Lohse? It seems obvious to me.

Oh and soda, beer and food are expensive everywhere. Even the Royals who’s payroll is about half of the Cardinals sell beer for 7 bucks - get over it. If you want cheap food go to Arby’s and stay away from Busch, I don’t think our city will have any problem filling your empty seat.

— bluecard
1:31 am December 9th, 2008

Bluecard- I couldn’t have said it any better.

— Cardsballhawk
6:42 am December 9th, 2008

When you start to think about the Cards getting Bennett, think Carpenter. Maybe good for a year or two if you are lucky. People are just getting too hung up on getting a top of the line pitcher for four or five years. Look around and see how many of those guys come through for that kind of money. Zito? Schmidt? Pavano? etc, etc, etc.

— David
7:51 am December 9th, 2008

Cards65, you do realize that the Chicago Tribune, owners of the “Great” Chicago Cubs, just filed for bankruptcy protection, right? They don’t sound like the example to follow now, do they?

This attitude that the Cardinals should simply spend with abandon is childish. It sounds like a bunch of 2 years olds. I WANT IT, I WANT IT, I WANT IT!!!!! If you want the Cardinals to continue to be an home-town team, and if you want them to be a consistently competitive team, then the DeWitt and Mozeliak approach is the correct one to take.

Just a little history lesson. The Cardinals became the dominant NL franchise when Branch Rickey devised that it was only possible for his team to compete with the big-market teams by developing and signing home-grown talent. (BTW, one of those close to Rickey at the time happened to be Bill DeWitt, Jr; so maybe his kid knows something about this approach.) Rickey then took the same approach to Brooklyn to make the Dodgers the premier NL franchise during his era.

Granted, free agency has changed the game some; but ultimately the economic environment in baseball today is very similar to what Rickey was dealing with. The big-market teams had the ability to buy up the premier talent in the country, and the other teams were left with the scraps.

The Cardinals fan base has been reduced over the last few decades with the addition of teams like the Atlanta Braves, the Kansas City Royals, and the Colorado Rockies (these all used to be hotbeds for the Cardinals). The era of radio has past, and the city of St. Louis has been in a steady decline since the introduction television broadcasts. They are NOT a big-market team. They are only considered a mid-market team because of the traditional fan base. Even in a $Billion industry, it is necessary to be fiscally responsible; and, despite all of the money that the Cardinals make, they do not have an unlimited budget.

— etp_stl
8:34 am December 9th, 2008

Pages: « 1 [2] Show All