Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
01.30.2008 1:53 pm

McCaskill minding her Ps & Qs

WASHINGTON–Sen. Claire McCaskill loves to joke about how “my mouth gets me in trouble.” But the Missouri Democrat was unusually tight-lipped and cautious at a session with Missouri reporters here this morning, even as she discussed everything from the Missouri governor’s race to the raging presidential showdown.

On the former, McCaskill dismissed suggestions that presumed Democratic nominee Jay Nixon faced a more difficult task in the gubernatorial race now that he didn’t have Gov. Matt Blunt to kick around, although she said it wasn’t going to be a cakewalk either.

“Jay has a slight edge at this point because of the change message,” she said. “But he’s going to have to run hard and not make any mistakes.”

She ducked a question about whether Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan, D, should jump into the fray, saying it would be “pretty nervy of me” to comment on anyone’s right to mount a primary challenge. (McCaskill, in case anyone needs a reminder, infuriated some Democratic Party faithful when she took on incumbent Gov. Bob Holden.)

On the presidential front, McCaskill said she was so passionate in her support for Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., that it was hard for her to handicap the race because she couldn’t be objective. She hardly went out on a limb with this offering on Missouri’s pivotal Feb. 5th contest: “I’ll make a prediction–and it’s always a safe prediction in Missouri–it’ll be close.”

Asked if the Democrats faced a tougher general election contest if Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., is the GOP nominee, McCaskill first said: “I really don’t’ want to answer that question.” Then she did, previewing one likely Democratic line of attack on a McCain candidacy.

“I believe John McCain’s position on the war and foreign policy will be a deal breaker for him” in Missouri, she said. “John McCain is going to be status quo. The Democratic nominee is going to be change.”

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 2.25 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
4 comments

Comments are closed.

I would like to ask Senator McCaskill does she believe since Obama said, “There’s no white America, there’s no Black America, there’s just the United States of America,” that If Senator Obama happens to be the nominee that You mean the Republicans are going to play fair, and show Obama respect? You mean like they played fair and showed Gore respect? You mean like they played fair and showed Kerry respect?

— Ben David
3:47 pm January 30th, 2008

The Republicans wouldn’t show Mother Theresa respect if she were running–they would paint her as an unpatriotic terrorist lover and bleeding heart welfare endorser (probably a “tree hugger” too). The republican Noise Machine will soon be going full throttle in Rovian attack mode, dividing America, painting everything in black and white…and (my personal fave) crying “foul” to the ump over and over again at how the mainstream media doesn’t allow their vocies to be heard…of course they MAKE this claim usually while hawking their books/shows.etc. ON mainstream media shows (LOL).

Disgusting–and a lot of Americans are fed up with the NOISE.

BTW-I full understand that Mother Theresa could NOT run for president since she was not born in America…I was using hyperbole for effect, ya know, like how Ann Coulter does all the time to make a point?

— sick of repugs
4:32 pm January 30th, 2008

McCaskill’s right - McCain is the status quo just like Hillary is - so there is technically no difference. McCain voted for this unnecessary war just like Hillary. If Obama and McCain are the nominees, I am going to vote for Obama. I don’t want the same old thing. I want change.
I am willing to give him a chance. I want to see a better life for the black community. Let’s see what he is able to do.

— loyal Republican
4:52 pm January 30th, 2008

Since Obama made it to the Senate and actually had a vote on the issue, he’s voted right along with McCain and Clinton to continue funding the war. Regardless of what he said on the war when he was a state legislator in Springfield, IL, with no say in the matter, he’s as much “status quo” on the war right now as Clinton is. I think Bill Clinton went too far in his attacks, but he was absolutely right when he said that Obama’s voting record on Iraq has been the exact same as Hillary’s has been in that time. He opposed the war at the start but voted to continue it as soon as he hit DC.

— Haden Smith
9:25 pm February 1st, 2008