Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
03.06.2008 9:26 am

A Democratic Do-Over?

Vote early and often? The never-ending Democratic presidential contest may give new meaning to that old cliché as Florida and Michigan party officials seek a potential do-over for their states’ voters.

The two states defied Democratic Party rules by moving their primaries up on the voting calendar, a decision the Democratic National Committee said would cost them their seats at the nominating convention.

Both Sens. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., agreed not to campaign in the states and in Michigan, Obama’s name wasn’t even on the ballot. Clinton won both states. Ever since, she’s had a change of heart, arguing that the delegates should be seated even though they flouted party rules.

With the Obama-Clinton showdown as unsettled as ever, Florida and Michigan’s political leaders are increasingly lobbying for a solution, pressing for their states’ delegates to be seated at the convention or for voters to get a second chance at the ballot box.

Even though the Republican race is settled, Florida’s GOP governor, Charlie Crist, has also weighed in, noting that the national GOP has said it will seat only half of Florida’s delegates at its nominating convention. “They made their voice heard,” Christ said on CNN this morning, speaking of Florida’s voters. “We want them all to be seated.”

Said Howard Dean, DNC chairman: “You cannot violate the rules of the process and then expect to be forgiven.”

Still, Dean signaled that he’s open to a do-over if the state’s come up with a new voting plan.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
6 comments

Comments are closed.

People like to imply that Republicans are the party of voter suppression. Despite the fact that the Democratic leaders violated rules in Florida and MIchigan, the punishment is still on the indiviual voters in those states. Because of what a few people decided, the populace has to suffer? Not to mention the use of Super Delegates to try and prevent a “mistake” from being made by the voters if the vote is split. This party is not for the people, it’s for the elite.

— Ghetto Prez Sucks
9:47 am March 6th, 2008

True, GPS, but it is for the elite that are for the people. Kind of like secondhand smoke …

Just remember, if you were as smart as Howard Dean, YOU would be DNC chairman.

— Nick Kasoff
12:08 pm March 6th, 2008

Ghetto Prez Sucks,

The Democratic citizens voted for these people to represent them. Their choosen Democratic leaders failed them. So yes, they will suffer for the the bad actions of their chosen leaders. Same as in most cases of when you hire an attorney as your representative, when they screw you over, you still must suffer the results of their bad actions.

The solution is for the people in these states to not vote these Democrats back into office. The officials who represent you will stop taking you for granted in the future if you respond in this way, even if it mean that a Republican will replace theses ones. The people should ask these ones to step down and if they will not, then vote them out ( get rid of them), they are unfit to exist in their position, even if it mean that they are replaced with Republicans or whatever. It will almost guarantee that such behavior will cease amongst those who are suppose to be representing your interests.

Show that they represent you the people instead of special interest groups.

Does anyone know what the purpose was for these Democratic leaders in Florida and Michigan going against their party rules and holding early elections? It was just a crazy thing to do.

The only fair way of going about it would be if everyone agreed in the Democratic National Party, to hold campaigns and new elections.

— D. Walker
1:59 pm March 6th, 2008

Can we in MO have a do-over too? It’s only fair.

— Harry
12:14 pm March 7th, 2008

As Howard Dean said elsewhere, you don’t change the rules after the game is over. I never thought I’d agree with Dean about anything, but in this case, he’s right. Even a do-over isn’t a fair solution here: the date of an election matters, not only in its ability to influence the national results, but also as regards the relative strength of the participants. A do-over could end up being just as unfair as seating the original delegates.

— Nick Kasoff
12:26 pm March 7th, 2008

Now the Gop and its right wing neocon Brown Shirt weblog echochmabering yobbo yappers are giving it to the Dems.

What part of “illegal” don’t you understand?

The rules of both parties say you can’t do the primary before a certain date, the GOP legislature sets the election before the date and now bashes the Dems for the GOP’s wrongdoing? Swift Boating lives in Florida, shaddap Charlie Crist!

— Tim Hogan
2:05 pm March 11th, 2008