Here are Obama’s gaffes which you will never read about in the PD. Especially note Obama’s gaffe in Cape Girardeau this month which was never mentioned by the PD: http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=296255421620661

Centrist (in what reality?)-
I read the article you so gleefully referred to. So? Where is the equivalency between mistating and correcting immediately Sioux City for Sioux Falls, and, talking about the assassination in California of Senator Robert Kennedy?

Senator Clinton really should have remembered that Senator Robert Kennedy was the senator from New York.

I am sorry, but talking about assassination in an election cycle is not a smart thing to do at any time. It is on a whole different level from other misstatements.

Dear Superdelegates:

Please END HILLARY’S REIGN OF TERROR.

I must extend an apology to “ACentrist” for my snide aside regarding his choice of nom de guerre, it is a bad habit I have that most times I can keep under control.

If Hillary was MY vice president, the first cabinet post I’d fill would be “Food Taster”.

RH- I don’t recall where I equated gaffes. I was merely pointing out that the PD, which has endorsed Obama, have been short on publishing any of his gaffes whereas Hillary doesn’t seem to get the same generisity in the press.

Having said that, she had can only pray, with the Clintons track record of people dying and people that have gone missing, that nothing even close to that happens to Sen. Obama. I am glad he asked for security.

All day long on the radios of over the road truck drivers, for some time now, many make reference about murdering Obama, saying such things as, “it has been a long time since we lynched a N-word”, etc…

People can pretend to be so naive or those others who are truly so naive can give Hillary Clinton all the benefit of the doubt that they want, but Mrs. Hillary knew exactly the effect that her statement would have.

Hillary appears to be a very unstable individual and extremely unstately and desperate, all because she can’t accept the fact that she is losing this battle or more factually, she has lost this battle. She is truly becoming an embarrassment, she playing the wounded woman role, drawing pity for herself, all at the expense of her party, the Democrats. She is truly a selfish woman. No man would ever in a million years pull such crap as Hillary Clinton is pulling. And she want to play ball with men? She is causing woman to look pathetic.

She certainly has no place in American politics in this day when so many of us want change and reject such unnecessary drama, dark actions and thoughts.

She certainly isn’t competent to handle foreign affairs if she can’t get something as simple as it being extremely unacceptable and inappropriate and dark to mention assassination as an example of what could occur during an election year, as a reason for her not getting out of the race.

Not to mention the reality of the difficulty she as a woman will have dealing with Middle Eastern leaders no matter how much she or her many feminist followers refuse to understand this fact or the Middle Eastern culture and the culture of many other countries who we are forced to deal with no matter how much we disagree with their ways. We must deal with them out of necessity now and must play ball to their tune to a certain extent.

Do you normally monitor CB traffic or was that a generalization of your image of truck drivers?