Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.14.2008 6:35 pm

Todd Akin: Profile in courage or politically nuts?

WASHINGTON — Alone in Missouri, and also among the southern Illinois congressional delegation, Rep. Todd Akin voted against the farm bill on Wednesday.

The Missouri Republican says it was a tough choice, but fiscal considerations demanded it.

The bill amounted to about $300 billion, but only 13 percent went to farmers or agriculture, while 73 percent “is for entitlements and food stamps,” Akin says. “It’s that 73 percent I have trouble with.”

Akin, a former businessman, has always been tight with taxpayers’ money, and he wasn’t about to stop now.

Is he a profile in courage?

“I may be a profile in trying to follow my own conscience and in trying to do what is fiscally responsible,” he says. The vote may be politically disadvantageous, he adds, noting that he got considerable pressure to support the bill from some of his “friends and supporters.”

“That’s what makes it very difficult,” Akin says. “I’ve had a very good relationship with the people in the Farm Bureau in Missouri  and think very highly of them.”

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
17 comments

Comments are closed.

Courage!

— Truth is
7:48 pm May 14th, 2008

I can’t disagree with Akin’s no vote. Farm aid and subsidy was established for agriculturist when world markets were restricting trade.

What I find ironic is Akin lives in Creve Coeur, in a residential area - and about two acres of his 5 acre property is zoned AGRICULTURE and he pays only $100 in property tax on those two acres, where no crops or hay is grown.

I’ll never vote for Akin. He’s not like an average citizen. He doesn’t like public education and home schools his kids, even though his home district Parkway is one of the best in the country.

There’s just something about him that makes me think he’s just weird and sometimes creepy.

— Scott_Simon
5:52 am May 15th, 2008

Nuts to the Missouri Farm Bureau.

I wish more Republicans had voted against this bill. What’s more surprising though is how much Democratic support it garnered. Democrats love to demagogue the issue of corporate welfare, but when push comes to shove, they usually vote for it.

— Go_Fish
9:23 am May 15th, 2008

Scott Simon….
If you think Akin is creepy you should read the biographies of some real weirdos like G. Washington, B. Franklin, J. Madison, and T. Jefferson. Those nuts actually thought citizens should be free to make choices (good and bad) without government interference except in cases of necessity as defined in the U.S. Constitution. Of course they would never understand the reasoning for embedding socialist spending in a “farm” bill that is unconstitutional to begin with. It is amazing how many nut jobs there are who don’t realize the wisdom in the Communist Manifesto by Marx and Engels, which outlines the reasoning behind the farm bill.

— Bb
9:29 am May 15th, 2008

A local TV station did a report last year on Akin’s “tax-evasion” scandal concerning his farmland (residence) in Town and Country. Actually, Akin has 5 acres assesed as agricultural even though he doesn’t own livestock or grow crops. In the 1990’s new subdivisions with million dollar homes were built adjacent to his land. Akin is the only one with agricultural assessements valued at $150 an acre…Everyone else, and many homeowners have several acres, are assessed at the residential rate of $205,000 per acre…..County assessors claim they need access to Akin’s property to complete a new assessment, but he’s never home…

It pays to be a Congressman. It’s so nice of him to be concerned about how taxpayer’s money is spent.

— Garrison
11:08 am May 15th, 2008

“County assessors claim they need access to Akin’s property to complete a new assessment, but he’s never home…”

You know you’re lying, right?

— Go_Fish
12:28 pm May 15th, 2008

Let me get this straight:
Out of $300 billion, $39 billion was going to agriculture (13%),and, $219 billion were going to the food stamp program (73%). Just one question. Where was the other $42 billion (14%) going? Or is this something that Akin is not willing to talk about? Or did someone goof up in doing their math?

— RHarnack
1:49 pm May 15th, 2008

Fish head….Here, watch the video before you start shooting your mouth.
http://www.ksdk.com/video/default.aspx?aid=54484&bw=

— Garrison
2:17 pm May 15th, 2008

Your turds are piling up in the yard again garrison. It’s a lie to claim Akin’s involved in some sort of property tax scandal. The property is being assessed at the proper amount. As the reporter correctly said, if it’s not zoned correctly, it’s the county’s fault, not Akins’.

The report also clearly states that landowners are not responsible for keeping property records up to date in St. Louis or any other county. The reporter clumsily tried to make an issue of it, but it’s a simple fact that landowners do not have to be present during assessments (remember the “drive by” assessments a couple years back?).

It’s probably true assessors won’t enter a residence without advanced notice or permission, but that doesn’t have to come from the congressman himself. Anyone can let them in or put keys under the door mat. And since the only issue involved here was land, the assessment could have been made from the side of the road or by using one of the county’s own aerial photos. The reporter curiously leaves out the simple fact that land zoned agricultural doesn’t have to be a working farm. There are hundreds of thousands of acres of private property in this state not cultivated or used for livestock production.

If there’s a “scandal” here, it’s entirely in your feverish mind.

— Go_Fish
3:41 pm May 15th, 2008

Let’s see Todd Akin’s no vote on farm subsidy is something you agree with but he not like the “average citizen” because he self educates his children which makes him weird and sometime creepy. Scott are you voting age?

Ed Jamison

— jamsett
4:53 pm May 15th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All