Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
06.24.2008 7:37 pm

Uprising — of the left or right?

WASHINGTON –The country is perched on the edge of an uprising that could go either way — left or right — while significantly affecting the presidential election, author David Sirota says in an intriguing new book in which Missouri and Illinois play a role. He was recently interviewed in Washington.

In “The Uprising: An Unauthorized Tour of the Populist Revolt Scaring Wall Street and Washington,” Sirota argues that much of the population is either in a state of disaffection and apathy, has moved on to the stage of ferment or rising up, or is engaged in a full-fledged movement. He bases this on his observations gained while traveling throughout the country for a year, including with Minutemen in Missouri and activist Saul Alinsky in Chicago.

The “seething popular discontent” could greatly affect this year’s presidential election, but it could go either way — conservative like the Reagan Revolution of the 1980s, or liberal, like the civil rights and other movements of the 1960s or the 1930s uprising that developed the modern labor movement and the New Deal, Sirota says. Leftward, which he clearly favors, would mean advocacy for universal health care and action against the oil companies, while rightward would involve an anti-immigrant campaign and possible war with Iran, he argues.

It’s the second book for Sirota, a syndicated newspaper columnist who previously wrote Hostile Takeover, an equally provocative look at the corporate and monied influence in Washington. He’ll discuss his new book at 7 p.m. July 1 at Left Bank Books in St. Louis.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
9 comments

Comments are closed.

Wow, Mr. Sirota spent a whole year out amongst the unwashed multitudes? Such a hero. I’m sure he found all kinds of anecdotal evidence for his theories. He may be right about the change, but I think there is no doubt as to which way it will go.

— willys
9:11 pm June 24th, 2008

Sirota pins “civil rights”, “advocacy for universal health care”, and “action against the oil companies” as positive outcomes for a liberal movement and “anti-immigrant” and “possible war with Iran” as negative outcomes for the conservative movement. Out of the 1960’s, Sirota sees “civil rights” as the positives but doesn’t mention the negatives that came out of that era: out-of-wedlock births; race riots and decay of once thriving urban cities; lower education standards and results; increase in crime; and looser moral standards. I’m hoping for the conservative movement.

— Logicprevails
8:59 am June 25th, 2008

Logicprevails - The great increase in births to unwed mothers was not the result of a liberalization of sexual mores, but rather, was the direct result of right-wing repression of birth control and sex education. And obviously, we wouldn’t have race riots if it wasn’t for all those Republican racists. It is those same Republican racists who create inner-city poverty, which is the sole cause of urban crime.

Tim Hogan for President!

— Nick Kasoff
9:05 pm June 25th, 2008

Hey, Nicko! Ya see what taking your meds does for you! Yours was a thoughtful, lucid post. Although constitutionally and personally competent to run for president, I have declined when asked in the past and will do so now. Thank you, and God bless America!

— Tim Hogan
8:36 am June 26th, 2008

I’ll point out that Republicans have been on the forefront of Civil Rights from Lincoln down to the Civil Rights movement which would not have happened as fast as it did without so much Republican support.

Universal Healthcare will bankrupt us. Everyone wants action on fuel costs and neither party takes that action. And it will take more than slapping the hand of oil companies (which I do defend) but also seeking out alt sources from solar to nuke and increasing production. The immigration issue isn’t about racism against a particular group but controlling the influx of people to make sure everything is maintained in a orderly fashion. We should have a guest worker program with an easy route into the country to fill unwanted jobs (though don’t we have 5% unemployment to fix?) as well as a registration of incoming immigrants. If crimes are committed they get deported with a one strike policy. Again, BOTH parties are bending us over on this one. War with Iran might be inevitable considering the lack of will western society has to put pressure on them to lose the nuke program and to stop barbaric human rights violations. Israel will start it if we don’t put forth a full effort soon.

I don’t think the author is wrong on the concept. We are heading toward an uprising because left wing and right wing people can’t punish their own parties for mistakes and compromise with the other side. We should be able to compromise on fuel issues. Legislation that requires certain levels of local production and allows expanded drilling. Legislation that requires higher fuel standards in all cars. Legislation that subsidizes research for alt fuels for both automotive and general power sources. Also, local pushes to move toward adding nuclear, solar and wind power that can push us into the future. But what do we get? Bush did this and the oil companies did that and Clinton failed at this. Fingerpointing.

As it stands right now, unless the population moves centrist and takes a compromising attitude (considering the Bush hatred and the Obama mistrust) we’ll be in for four more years of bi-partisan divisivness and fingerpointing. Should keep people like Nick Kasoff and Tim Hogan busy on the blogs.

— RCJ
2:26 pm June 26th, 2008

That depends on how many times each can repeat the same senseless, inane, ignorant, partizan blather.

— willys
12:38 pm June 28th, 2008

Why is it that all we can get from the PD is all this left wing tripe. Sorry I will miss the discussion at left bank. Perhaps the problem at the PD is that they keep reading all this crap from these commies. It’t time for your crowd to broaden your horizens and challenge yourselves.

TIM HOGAN FOR PRESIDENT!

— Stop the Obama Trauma
7:59 pm June 28th, 2008

Let’s see….repeat Rush, pretend to have some balanced approach, repeat Rush, make personal attack on Hogan (substitute her the name of any other person who has a mind of their own), congratulate self on being a voice for moderation.

For all those right wing neocon Brown Shirt weblog echochambering yobbo yappers, read this from your Master! Perhaps he wasn’t deaf from oxycontin abuse the day he said this, or hadn’t all the blood rush from his brain from using Viagra.

http://dangerousintersection.org/2006/11/09/rush-admits-he-has-been-a-water-carrier-for-the-rnc/

— Tim Hogan
1:21 pm June 30th, 2008

Hogan - I listen to NPR and Bill O’Reilly. No one wastes time with Rush.

But seriously, mind of your own? It’s the same right wing hating from you everyday. You even have a yadda dabba do tagline. It’s like you’re your own blog product. Continue with hate speech against the other side, insert tagline, later rinse repeat.

Be a voice of moderation is about talking between both sides and realizing we’re people with disagreements. Whens the last time you have been able to do that? Hell, you didn’t even address the issues and discussion topics I brought up. You just taglined it up. You exposition is weak and your argument is blatantly hypocritical. You wouldn’t have your own mind if Obama or Howard Dean, or whoever has it at the moment told you to. If you can’t accept both sides as disagreeable human beings, if you have to characterize them as evil, then you’re lost in the discussion. Because you aren’t having a discussion. You’re tiliting at windmills my friend and I can’t help you.

— RCJ
3:59 pm June 30th, 2008