Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
07.03.2008 2:10 pm

Loopholes let GOP haul it in – for Missouri prez race

WASHINGTON _ The new Republican fundraising plan isn’t all that surprising once you understand that a campaign contribution, like water, always finds the cracks.

What’s a tad ironic is the beneficiary of this campaign cash: John McCain,  who has spent considerable energy over the years trying to close campaign finance loopholes.

The Wall Street Journal reports today that McCain allies have identified loopholes in the contribution law that McCain helped write – cracks enabling a GOP fund set up to help governors.

The Republican Governors Association isn’t subject to contribution limits and thus is telling big donors to write checks that will be used to help elect McCain.

The Journal quotes a wealthy GOPer who wrote a check for ten times the legal limits under the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law as saying that a contribution to the governors group is “the best way to help McCain.”

This development could have a bearing on what happens locally. The association’s executive director, Nick Ayers, says his organization will target Missouri, America’s bellwether, along with two usually Republican states, North Carolina and Indiana.

Ayers freely admits that the plan is designed to help McCain and explains it in barnyard terms: “It’s like planting a lot of food out in the field for one cow; it helps that one cow, but all the other cows appreciate it, too.”

Since McCain-Feingold became law of the land in ’02, parties and contributors have figured ways to evade limits. The most popular trick was deplying so-called 527s – outside groups in both major political parties that plowed close to a half-billion bucks into the ’04 contest.

This time around, it’s no secret that the GOP has been looking for ways to match Barack Obama’s prodigious fund-raising abilities, primarily from small donors. Obama freed himself from spending limits this fall by spurning the federal matching system – after saying early on that he’d subscribe to it.

In another GOP effort that surfaced this week, the Republican National Committee set up an independent expenditure arm ostensibly to be free of the $20 million or so expenditure limit that the RNC can spend in coordination with the McCain campaign.

This device will be used principally for attack ads against Obama, according to speculation.

Reformers – McCain among them – had in mind a system under which by ’08 candidates would be spending about $85 million each for an eight-week campaign.

But when all the spending on this election is tallied up, it could total more like $1 billion.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
17 comments

Comments are closed.

Duh! The GOP and Bush/McCain illegally opted in, the out of public financing for the primaries. It’s no surprise now that more funds fudging is goimg on another way at the same time.

Slick Johnny Mc, campaign finance criminal! The GOP slimes again!

— Tim Hogan
4:45 pm July 3rd, 2008

McCain does not really need the money. The whining liberal media has already assured his election.

— davel
10:07 pm July 3rd, 2008

Hopefully the little Republican people who are not millionaires can see just how much the rich in America own McCain. During these times in this country, economically, Iraq etc., we do not need a rich man’s puppet, which is exactly what John McCain is today. In fact what is needed at this time is more seats in Washington with Democrats holding them to get this country back on the right track.

Republican pundits can scream all the innuendo’s they want about that under Obama and the Democrats about high taxes etc., but there is no denying the disaster that they have inflicted upon this country and are pretending to not see it.

Then we have these ones who want to blame it on the Democrats because they have controlled both Houses since 2006, and let me add BY A VERY SMALL PERCENTAGE! These people do not seem to understand that the Democrats hands are still tied and can not pass anything in Washington without enough Republican support and that support Democrats HAVE NOT GOTTEN from Republicans.

It is time to place a Democratic President in office and take more Republican seats in both Houses from Republicans in Washington. People need to wake up and see the hell that Republicans for the most part have brought upon this country and stop following these people further into the dark hole that we are in.

The reason being is that they do not seem to understand morals, even though they consider themselves the moral party, just like the situation concerning this campaign financial loophole.

Just like Iraq, with their reason for invading Iraq, purely for their oil.

Just like McCain claiming Obama is the hypocrite for not taking public finance, when he was is the one with dirty hands and Obama is placing the people first by doing this where his campaign money have come from us small people, not the wealthy people who are pulling McCain’s strings.

Many people have wised up, but few Republicans appear to have. This country cannot continue on in its ways of immoral business dealings in running this country. We need leaders who do not just say that they are moral, we need to see this moral behavior and once again the Republicans are showing their immorality here.

Its been their way since the Bush campaign even with the supposedly King of morals and man of God, James Dobson and many religious leaders stooping to immoral lows in putting together a packet sending them to churches to teach them how to cheat the tax law so that churches could be used to campaign for President Bush. Christians need to be careful what they insist on in asking God and going through every kind of seedy dealing to get it because what ended up happening, just like the Jews got King Saul we got President Bush.

— D. Walker
9:54 am July 4th, 2008

Ms. Walker, it is a shame that you feel that way. You must be in a very dark place to have such hatred boiling inside you. Let’s set the anger aside and look at some of your rants with objectivity.

1. Politicians are wealthy and owe favors to wealthy supporters. Obama is no different.
2. What disaster all you trying to claim has happened to our country? Mr. Bush has kept us safe since 9/11 and he actually is alot more liberal than most Republicans would like. You should be happy.
3. The Democrats have controlled Congress for virtually the entire Bush Presidency. When they didn’t have a majority, they fillibustered. Democrats HAVE GOT NOTHING ACCOMPLISHED.
4. What hell are we in Ms. Walker? Other than CHANGE, what is your party going to do to make things better? One guarantee is that if you raise taxes like Obama loves to do, you will send us into a deep, deep, dark hellish recession.
5. You claim that Republicans are immoral, when in reality, it is the party of morality. From the freeing of slaves, to the fight to protect innocent lives, the Republicans are on solid moral ground.
6. You need to take some time to relax this weekend. Hug a Republican, then come back and post with a little more civility. It is your party’s partisan politics that are driving a wedge in our country. While I do not necessarily like all of McCain’s positions, he is someone who reaches across the isle to make things happen. Take a look at his record and compare it with Obama’s short resume. You might see that he isn’t such a bad choice for you.

— Think|
11:57 pm July 4th, 2008

Another baised headline and story by the Post Disgrace. You seem to forget that any “loophole” works both ways and is being used by BOTH parties. This entire article could easily be rewritten to say: “Republicans are bad, Obama can do no wrong.”

Come on Mr. Lambrecht, try dumping your bais. You state, “This device will be used principally for attack ads against Obama, according to speculation.” Do you truly believe the Democratic National Committee will not use money they collect the same way to run attack ads against McCain? If you do believe this, watch out, Santa Claus is making a list and your going to end up on the naughty side.

— James R
7:25 am July 5th, 2008

Think| -
“3. The Democrats have controlled Congress for virtually the entire Bush Presidency. When they didn’t have a majority, they fillibustered.”
Nah, only since the inter-term elections in 2006, two (2) years ago. That means from day one until then Bush had a solid Republican majority that pretty much rubber-stamped everything he asked for.

The one or two times in the Senate when the Democratic Senators threatened to filibuster something particularly egregious, the majority whip threatened a “nuclear” option. So if Bush could not get what he wanted (as you claim) for the first 5.5 years of his presidency, then it must have been bad. Try sticking to the actual history and facts, not the spin.

— RHarnack
8:48 am July 5th, 2008

Think,

You live in a “La La Land” fantasy in your own mind, totally blinded to what really is past and present.

— D. Walker
11:41 am July 5th, 2008

My Party? I am a Independant, who have my entire voting life vote across all party lines, but at this time I will not vote again to place another Republican into Washington.

My conscience tells me to vote for Sarah Steelman for Missouri governor, because I am pretty certain that she is not corrupted minded, and she is not afraid to stand up against the status quo for what she knows to be right and good.

Hard to find Democrats or Republicans with such strong and good character.
She is about the only Republican I trust enough at this time to vote for.

— D. Walker
11:50 am July 5th, 2008

Loopholes let GOP haul it in? Well, according to a story elsewhere in the P-D, the candidate with the highest percent of loophole contributions is Democrat Chris Koster, who has received more than 80% of his contributions through loopholes.

Let’s elect Tim Hogan for President. He has never received a dime from a special interest.

— Nick Kasoff
4:49 pm July 5th, 2008

Ms. Walker,

I agree with you on one point, it is hard to find politicians with character. Unfortunately for you, your trust in Obama’s character is horribly misplaced.

La La land is for the liberals. I live in the real world and address real problems with real solutions. I am sick and tired of the politicians who whine about problems but do nothing to address them. Obama is most certainly one of those. McCain may not be an ideal, but he is better. At least he will not bribe the American people for votes.

— Think|
10:07 pm July 5th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All