Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
07.01.2008 10:49 am

Wes Clark: ‘I’d never diss McCain’s service, but …’

WASHINGTON _ John McCain’s POW years and deep military roots are a key selling point for his presidential candidacy. At the Republican National Convention this summer, expect the GOP to frame McCain as an American hero, and rightly so.

So when somebody seems to disparage McCain’s military record – even if it’s a four-star general talking – expect the McCain camp to call in the cavalry

That was the case this morning, when McCain loyalists came to the Arizona senator’s defense after retired Gen. Wesley Clark’s latest remarks to the effect that McCain’s background does not add up to being chief executive material.

“Well, I don’t think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president,” Clark, a decorated soldier himself and a former NATO commander, said Sunday on CBS’s Face the Nation.”

Clark, who ran for the Democrats’ presidential nomination four years ago, refused to back off last night, saying that he “would never, never diss someone’s service.” He added: “I have said this about John McCain’s qualifications for a long time.”

That’s true about Clark saying similar things before, but this time they struck a chord given the McCain campaign’s furious efforts to draw distinctions between their candidate and Obama.

Obama, for his part, distanced himself from Clark’s statements, sounding his refrain about respecting McCain’s service.

This morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., a close ally of McCain’s, was among those taking Clark – and Obama – to task. “No matter how he sugarcoats it, (Clark) is trying to question John’s service … I just don’t think it’s going to sit well with the American voter.”

McCain adviser Orson Swindle, a fellow POW, asserted that McCain’s Navy experience commanding a squadron of fighter pilots showed the senator’s management skills.

“Gen. Clark ought to be ashamed of himself, talking about a fellow serviceman,” he said. “Gen. Clark’s ethics and his integrity are impugned and violated, even if they exist, in this criticism of John McCain.”

17 comments

Comments are closed.

What a creep Wesley Clark is - and I love Schieffer called his bluff and asked him what the heck Obama has done? He looked shocked that a fellow Democrat would challenge him. Clark bombed and killed thousands of innocent civilians in Kosovo. Funny Mr. Peace never talks about that.

— A CENTRIST
11:27 am July 1st, 2008

Obama distanced himself. What a hoot. This guy has a line of surrogates talking smack, but he owns up to nothing. And so far as Wesley Clark goes … well, he supported John Kerry. So I guess while he does not believe that commanding a squadron of fighter pilots and serving faithfully as a POW counts for anything, he does believe that serving briefly as a boat captain and having a very public career as an anti-war protested - at the very moment McCain sat in chains - is a great qualification. What an idiot.

— Nick Kasoff
12:12 pm July 1st, 2008

Technically, Clark is correct, his years as POW and pilot do not qualify him to be POTUS. However, his love of his country, willingness to sacrifice his life, 20+ years of senate service, integrity, etc etc. etc. DO qualify him to become POTUS. I really hope he wins by a landslide!

— Momof1girl
12:52 pm July 1st, 2008

I find it interesting that so many people were upset about Gen. Clark’s comment about Senator McCain, especially because I strongly suspect many of these same people thought Senator Kerry deserved what he got when the same thing was done to him. I seem to remember one of Senator Kerry’s defenders was his fellow Senator John McCain.

Of course, Senator McCain would have to salute General Clark, and maybe that is where the difference is, a General who has commanded an army may have a different perspective on these things.

The fact remains, that if Senator McCain chooses to run on his service record, he has to expect to be asked tough questions, after all he put it into play.

— RHarnack
2:10 pm July 1st, 2008

RHarnack: You are mistaken. Capt. McCain isn’t running on his military service. It is a part of his history that is well-known. He never said it was what qualified him to be POTUS. And, just to be clear, I was not supportive of Kerry, but it had nothing to do with his 4 months of military service in Vietnam. It had to do with his politics.

— Momof1girl
3:09 pm July 1st, 2008

This stuff is silly, and its especially funny to see how the media narrative all marches to the exact same drum-step of taking Clark’s comments out of context. This post, like almost all of the other msm posts, make it sound as if Clark just pulled this quote out of thin air. Actually, he was responding to a comment by Schieffer (http://mediamatters.org/items/200807010001?f=h_top) :

SCHIEFFER: I have to say, Barack Obama has not had any of those experiences either, nor has he ridden in a fighter plane and gotten shot down. I mean –

CLARK: Well, I don’t think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president.

So Schieffer suggests that being shot down is a qualification and Clark says it isn’t. Big deal; this is not a criticism of McCain’s military record.

Even more ridiculous is the fact that one of the surrogates McCain sent to whine about Clark happens to be Colonel Bud Day, one of the people appeared in a Swift Boat ad against Kerry which deliberately lied about Kerry’s record.

I hope the msm starts getting serious real soon.

— Adam S
3:26 pm July 1st, 2008

“The thought of [McCain] being president sends a cold chill down my spine. He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and he worries me.” — Republican Senator Thad Cochran

“[McCain’s] temper would place this country at risk in international affairs, and the world perhaps in danger. In my mind, it should disqualify him.” — former Republican senator Bob Smith

— Lisa12
2:45 am July 2nd, 2008

Lisa, I believe it was Obama’s hot headed friend, Wes Clark, that almost started World War III in Bosnia. Clark’s comments were calculated to take scrutiny off of Obama’s record…and it worked. Instead of discussing the real issues in the campaign and highlighting the differences between himself and Obama, McCain has decided to reply to Clark’s stupid comments. I also don’t understand why McCain is doing a tour outside the country. Although, I think it’s interesting that Columbian troups just rescued the FARC hostages.

There will be more stupid comments made by Obama surrogates to get McCain to respond to them….he just needs to ignore them and concentrate on Obama’s liberal record and how he’ll bring us back to the Carter years of high inflation; high taxes; and a weaker military.

— Logicprevails
3:38 pm July 2nd, 2008

The only person who lied about John Kerry’s military record was John Kerry. This is a documented fact that his former supporters just can’t seem to wrap their diapers around.

Be that as it may, whether or not one served in the military should never be a qualification for office. Still, if the job entails the responsibility of Commander in Chief, I’ll take a career navy pilot over someone who was never even a cub scout any day. The real irony here is that former Gen Clark was unceremoniously relieved of command for incompetence. Why he thinks he’s qualified to comment on anyone elses military service is beyond me.

Have to give liberals their due, though. They said Viet Nam was a quagmire and they were right. Here it is 2008 and they still can’t get themselves away from it.

— Go_Fish
4:00 pm July 2nd, 2008

Go_Fish,

Totally disgraceful and unpatriotic, your claims about Kerry and his military record. Also, why is it that Republicans such as you do not seem to understand what it means to be patriotic and honorable is except to accuse others of not being these things?

Lastly, I may be incorrect concerning you, so please tell us the facts that you are speaking about concerning Kerry lying about his military record.

— D. Walker
4:53 pm July 2nd, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All