Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.18.2008 2:00 am

No, Speed Racer, no!

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

I gave “Speed Racer” a second chance tonight, because it was playing at the drive-in, where every movie seems better.

In my new (albeit 15-year-old) car, I wouldn’t have minded the 150-mile round-trip drive to the Starlite, north of Potosi, if my wife and nephew had enjoyed the movie. But around the time that Spritle and Chim-Chim went bonkers on candy, Kathryn whispered to me, “This is the worst movie I’ve ever seen.” And 6-year-old Joey, who had begged me to take him, fell asleep before the halfway point.

You know a movie is bad when even the geeks turn against it. On IMDb, some smartypants posted a note about an apparent goof in the movie. The first time Speed is in a race, the one where he is close to breaking his dead brother’s record, the number on his car is 6. But the Mach 6 car doesn’t get built until the very end of the film. Thus this car at the beginning should have been the iconic Mach 5, which he drives in subsequent scenes. The geek and I could both be wrong, since the movie is incredibly hard to follow, but I surmise that this scene was originally supposed to take place later in the story, until the co-directors repurposed it. Since almost everything in the movie is a digital creation, it would have been easy for the Wachowskis to fix the number–if they had been paying as much attention to their story as to their color palette.

(For better or worse, in the Internet age, there are six billion fact checkers. On Friday, I mistakenly identified the Indiana Jones movie in which a cult worships the goddess Kali as “The Last Crusade.” Dozens of helpful readers were quick to point out that it was “The Temple of Doom.”–which I actually knew, because I had watched the movie a couple days earlier. Fortunately, on the Web you can correct a mistake without leaving a trace. Unless you’re dumb enough to blog about it afterward.)

8 comments

Comments are closed.

Speed racer was good you moron.

— Rex Racer
1:49 pm May 18th, 2008

On the Mach 6 Issue. Has I understood the movie, there is two cars. The Mach 5 for rally racing like the Paris Dakar and the Mach 6 for track racing like in the F1 or Nascar. In the first race we see him running with the Mach 6 where he wins the Thunderhead race. After he declines the offer from Mr. Royalton he goes to Fuji where he also runs with the Mach 6 but he detroys it in a big cras. For the final race at the Grand Prix, the Racer family builds an enterily new Mach 6.
A fan of Speed Racer.

— Alexei
2:12 pm May 18th, 2008

I too totally disagree with you, i feel that the only thing that they did wrong in this movie was when they let it out. People wouldve been more apt to give this movie the respect and time it deserves if they werent so stuck on the whole “all movies should be done like transformers theory”. Now dont get me wrong Transformers were great and so was Ironman but if all movies start having the same mechanical feel to it, then i would get bored. Movies should be different, give me movies that stimulate my senses! I love to be rushed with emotions and color! and Speed Racer did just that i felt just like a kid again stayin up past my bedtime to see speed race the AWESOME Mach 5. And for Chim chim and Spritle plain hilarious, reminds me of when children use there imagination. In fact i will be owning this movie and cant wait to have all that wonderful color rush right through me once again.

— Super Steff
2:31 pm May 18th, 2008

I can’t comment on the movie as I have not seen it but the original “Speed Racer” cartoon was and is a piece of crap.

— Roy T.
2:03 pm May 19th, 2008

Did not like the movie either. The Wachowskis are not good.

What’s up Joe? Sorry about the long round trip, the Skyview in Belleville not good enough for you?

— R. Probus
10:05 am May 23rd, 2008

The people trashing this movie are the ones looking for it to be bad to begin with. My son was entranced throughout. The movie was visually pleasing and the story was interesting. Definitely not an Oscar film, but worth the time and money spent. You go to movies to be entertained and this fit the bill. Too bad to many closed-minded critics are reviewing it.

— Think|
1:46 pm May 25th, 2008

Does anyone ever proofread their Blog? Your comments are not worth reading if you can’t be grammatically correct. Rex, use commas. Alexei, spelling, missed words, capitalization. Etc etc… Guess that’s why you all should stay in school and pay attention in English class. Bob Costas was right when he said “. Most of it (blogging) is a combination of ignorance or invective.”
“It’s just a high-tech place for idiots to do what they used to do on bar stools or in school yards, if they were school yard bullies, or on men’s room walls in gas stations. That doesn’t mean that anyone with half a brain should respect it.”

— James D
12:13 pm May 29th, 2008

I saw it drunk and for free and I still regret seeing that hideous piece of @#%&!!!!

— Alec Minerov
10:56 pm May 30th, 2008