Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
10.07.2008 4:31 am

Left and right fight to a box-office draw?

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

Director David Zucker told me in an interview last week that it would be “a cultural election”: his anti-Michael Moore comedy “An American Carol” versus Bill Maher’s anti-religion documentary “Religulous.” Both movies opened last Friday. And both earned about the same amount of money over the weekend: $3.8 million for “An American Carol,” $3.5 million for “Religulous.” So who really won?

Some will point out that “Religulous” screened on far fewer screens and made about three times as much money in the important per-screen-average calculation. They could also point out that “Religulous” got much better reviews than “An American Carol,” which was panned by the few left-wing eggheads who were able to slip past the deliberate press embargo.

I thought Maher’s movie was funny but imbalanced, manipulating the interviews to give Maher the sarcastic last word against fundamentalist simpletons. All I’ve seen of Zucker’s movie is the trailer, which is little more than a series of slapstick assaults on a Michael Moore lookalike (Kevin Farley, brother of Chris).

In other words, both movies prefer cheap shots to a real debate.

There’s a lot of that going around.

5 comments

Comments are closed.

Is there a way that both these extremist overly-political movies can just disappear? I cringe when I see either trailer.

— supersleuth
8:42 am October 7th, 2008

There was a “deliberate press embargo” on American Carol?

That probably meant they had to buy a ticket in order to see the movie. No wonder hardly any reviewers saw it.

— cavedog
8:59 am October 7th, 2008

Well, being an athiest AND detesting Michael Moore, I’m seeing both. Already saw “Religulous” and loved it (could have lived without the “sermon” at the end, but still). Will see the other soon.

I don’t really see them as opposites, to be honest. You can be a conservative and/or Republican without being into religion; for that matter, you can be reasonably liberal and/or a Democrat without liking a far-left crazy like Moore.

— MoviePhanatic
1:45 pm October 7th, 2008

To Cavedog (who shares the name of one of my favorite bands): The distributors of “An American Carol” chose not to screen the movie in advance for critics, which means reviews could not run on the day of the Friday opening. Critics can’t simply “buy a ticket” for a movie that hasn’t opened yet, and newspapers don’t run reviews two or three days after the fact, because by then, the word-of-mouth public has already weighed in.

It’s certainly no embargo on our part–the Post-Dispatch will review any movie that is made available to us before our deadline.

— Joe Williams
7:24 pm October 7th, 2008

The difference between the two is that one seriously questions a point of view where the other just parodies one. Maher’s film raises some serious questions and uses hyperbolic examples to illustrate the lunacy. Personally, I don’t understand why anyone (especially a nation) needs an invisible man to talk to and act as a guard dog. After reading the Bible for many years and understanding it, I too have sworn off all religion because of the evils and dangers that Maher states. Michael Moore is an easy target and a deserving one, but Moore’s success or failure will not destroy the country or world. Literal interpretation of holy books likely will.

— Kevin F.
7:09 am October 11th, 2008