Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
11.14.2008 5:46 pm

About 1,000 employees sign up for Anheuser-Busch’s retirement program

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

Nearly 1,000 employees at Anheuser-Busch have signed up for retirement, the company said today.

The “enhanced retirement program” was one part of a cost savings program called Blue Ocean, announced earlier this year. As part of Blue Ocean’s goal of generating more than $1 billion in savings by 2010, A-B announced plans to reduce its full-time salaried work force in the U.S. by 860 to 1,290 jobs by the end of 2008.

With the strong response to its offer for early retirement — as well as jobs reduced through standard attrition – Anheuser-Busch indicated it was exceeding its cost-cutting goals.

The acceptance rate for the retirement program ”is ahead of what we expected,” Anheuser-Busch said in a statement. Applications for early retirement continued to roll in Friday afternoon, leading Anheuser-Busch to predict that the company would attract more than 1,000 participants.  

Employees who signed up for the retirement program will receive an added three years of credited age and years of service, which could enhance their pension benefits and eligibility for retiree medical benefits. The program also offers payments equivalent to up to one year’s salary.

Despite swirling rumors to the contrary, the company said it had “not announced or made any additional changes to” its work force. It also said it did not anticipate making any further organizational announcements until after InBev buys the company.

Still, much hinges on InBev’s plans after the Belgian brewer buys Anheuser-Busch. That is expected to happen by the end of the year, and possibly within a week.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
5 comments

Comments are closed.

It’s all about the dollar folks. The Busch family knows that for a company to survive past the 3rd generation it must be sold. AB has been very lucky.
Yes they will make a tidy profit but, AB will survive. It might not be the same company that we all knew but, it will still be here.

Look back to the 70’s and 80’s there were Pabst,Schlitz,Strohs,Baltz just to name a few. They didn’t change and look where they are today.

The Busch family owns very little of the company. Who demands the higher profits? Stock holders do. This could be your neighbor or friend.

If you are really unhappy go buy a MillerCoors product.
Don S.

— Don S.
10:30 am November 15th, 2008

Re any promises for retiree health care …….. GET IT IN WRITING and make sure the wording says at least 2 things (1) ITS CANNOT be changed in the future by anyone for any reason (3) if it does change (say a court allows it after a fight due to “plan” wording that says the company reserves the right , blah, blah, blah) that OUTSIDE THE “PLAN” the company agrees to provide AFTER TAX compensation in an amount sufficient to purchase the EQUILAVENT BENEFIT in the OPEN MARKET, and that this provision also connot be changed in the future.

— Bull
8:11 am November 17th, 2008

yes, Don S, look where Pabst is today. The largest American owned beer company, that sells a product immensely better than Budweiser. If you ventured outside the city limits of St. Louis, you’d find out that AB products are not the only thing available.

— b
11:09 am November 17th, 2008

You’re missing the point–I understand about profits “staying in the US”, but in the end, if a company can provide good paying jobs in the US, isn’t that a good thing? It isn’t about what entity owns the company or in what country that entity is based, its about how the company is run. Carl Icahn is an American–ask former TWA folks how they feel about him. So this isn’t about Pabst being the largest American owned brewer (is that correct?), its about how InBev is going to run its new acquisition. All indications are that it won’t be pretty for St. Louis employees–InBev is going to have to go to extreme measures to get immediate value out of the acquisition. That is the major fear–not whether the company is American owned.

— beerguy
2:49 pm November 17th, 2008

I think you read too much into my post, there. I wasn’t trying to steer anyone towards Pabst. I think people should drink what they like. Don S was saying “Where are they now” regarding Pabst and the likes. All 4 of the beers/companies he mentioned are put out by Pabst Brewing Company. I was just letting him know that Pabst products are, in fact, quite popular. Just not here. If you go to Milwaukee, PBR is on tap at practically every bar. Their beers have won many more awards at the national beer festivals over the years than Anheuser Busch products. Again, I wasn’t trying to get anyone to boycott AB. That’s a rediculous idea. I drink Budweiser. More of my beer budget is aimed towards the likes of Schlafly and O’Fallon beers, so I’m still supporting St. Louis area jobs.

Pabst made the claim about America’s largest American owned beer company. I can’t think of any beer that would discredit that, however. They sell a LOT of brands. Old Milwaukee, Old Style, Olympia, Schlitz, Stag, and Stroh’s to name a few.

— b
5:11 pm November 17th, 2008