Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
06.29.2009 10:13 am

Updated: Is Anheuser-Busch InBev selling U.S. can plants?

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

We are picking up lots of rumors that Anheuser-Busch InBev has found a buyer for its can and lid plants in the U.S. Names being tossed around as buyers include Ball Corp. and Silgan Containers, two big suppliers of packaging. We are told that a deal could be announced in the next few days. Anheuser-Busch, Silgan and Ball declined to comment on Monday.

Lager Heads previously reported that executives from other packaging companies were visiting and inspecting Metal Container Corp., the Anheuser-Busch division that manufactures beverage cans and lids. (MCC is a big player. In 2007, it controlled about 25 percent of the aluminum beverage can market in the U.S.)

We stress that we have not confirmed an impending sale, but the sudden increase in tips and heads-ups makes us suspect that something is up. It was widely suspected that Anheuser-Busch InBev would have to sell its packaging division, or parts of it, to pay off debt from the combination of Anheuser-Busch and InBev. Analyst Gerard Rijk of ING estimates that Anheuser-Busch InBev still has $4.5 billion of asset sales left to do.

Anheuser-Busch’s Metal Container Corp. “harbors gold-plated assets that, in the hands of efficient operators, could offer significant synergies and upside over the ensuing 12-24 months,” KeyBanc Capital Markets analyst Chris Manuel wrote on June 11. Manuel estimated that a sale of Metal Container could fetch a price between $1billion and $1.4 billion.

Who has the firepower to pull off a deal for part or all of Metal Container? The amount of debt carried by potential acquirers can be an important factor. Analyst Parrish Glover of Morningstar provides some numbers. Rexam has one of the tidiest balance sheets among big packaging companies, with a net debt-to-capital ratio of 55 percent. By comparision, Ball’s ratio is 65 percent and Crown Holdings‘ is 85 percent. The ratio measures a company’s indebtedness — the higher the number, the more assets are tied up in debt.

Where this leaves us, we’re not sure. But we will continue chasing the story.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
18 comments

Comments are closed.

why is MCC so lucky?
Please please sell us or outsource us.

— stlitguy
11:05 am June 29th, 2009

Are you chained to your job? If you are so unhappy, find another one. If you don’t think you can find another job now, how will ABI outsourcing your position help you out?

— skeptical
11:16 am June 29th, 2009

skeptical - More than likely, stlitguy IS chained to his job by a lifetime of work. To walk away means giving up years of accrued and promised benefits.

Being sold off or outsourced to another company offers people the hope of again working for a business that cares about its’ employees.

— Former AB
11:37 am June 29th, 2009

Thank you “Former AB”’s comment. It’s easier to walk away than to see what you have been built is tearing down.

— stlitguy
11:46 am June 29th, 2009

As someone who has worked for ABPG in IT and now works for Ball in IT, I can say they’re a GREAT company to work for!

I’ll be following this story with interest…

— BallITGuy
6:43 am June 30th, 2009

I HOPE THAT MONEY[98 MILLION, 120,000 A MONTH] IS WORTH IT !!LITTLE AUGGIE NUMBER 4. IF YOU AND YOUR DAD HAD POSITIONED THE BREWERY WHEN YOU HAD THE CHANCE YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN TO BIG TO GET SWALLOWED. SO NOW YOU GOT DUMBASS BURRITTO GUTTING THE COMPANY YOUR FAMILY BUILT. IS THE MONEY WORTH IT?? I SAY NO!! YOU ALREADY HAD ENOUGH MONEY ANYWAY !!THANKS FOR NOTHING !YOUR LEGACIES ARE RUINED BOYS BOTH OF YOU!!

— big al
11:13 am June 30th, 2009

OK, I get it. Sell off AB assets to help pay for the takeover share price and then turn around and buy the cans from the new owners with their required overhead and profit. Short term cash for long term pain. This certainly is not rocket science. How are they going to pay for the additional can costs? Hold on to your fanny.

— morfirst
12:58 pm June 30th, 2009

So, Forbes reports today that “Ball and the industry are reducing industry capacity in advance of several major contracts up for renewal this year.” If Ball and cohorts are reducing industry capacity, then it makes one wonder why they would be in talks to buy MCC’s can plants. Of course, I guess MCC’s are better facilities which already come with an existing clientele. Very interesting…

— Sara
1:30 pm June 30th, 2009

I’m with Morfirst on this one. How can you sell something you need? They still need the cans. So they’ll have to buy the cans from the new owner. Currently AB has the cans at cost. Now they’ll have to buy them from someone else at that cost. Plus they’ll be losing any profit gained from other clients….. They’re robbing Peter to Pay Paul, only they owe Paul more money than Peter has.

This company is going down the drain.

— b
2:19 pm June 30th, 2009

edit * they’ll have to buy them from someone else at more than that cost *

— b
2:46 pm June 30th, 2009

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All