More guns will not solve the problem of violence
That someone would contend that the answer to gun violence such as the recent tragedy at Kirkwood City Hall is more guns rather than less is as predictable as that night will follow day. But, let’s take a closer look at the situation. On that fateful evening there were three individuals who were armed and approximately 35 who were not. All three of the men carrying weapons are dead as are three who were unarmed. The first person to die that night was an experienced, highly trained police officer. As it turns out, the only way he could have survived would have been for him to shoot Mr. Thornton, without provocation, as he approached! Mr. Thornton then took that officer’s gun, so, now he had two guns as he entered the Council Chambers! Once inside, he again targeted the armed police officer. Had the approximately 35 individuals then pulled their guns and begun firing, someone might have disabled Mr. Thornton before he could have killed all of the three other victims, but, how many innocent people would have been killed or wounded in the hail of bullets from the guns of 35 basically untrained and unskilled shooters? Has this country sunken to the level where everyone must carry a gun for personal protection? If so, how long will it be before disputes are again settled at the OK Corral? Since the letter writer seems to think that taking away the concealed-carry permit is sufficient punishment for those who use their guns illegally, I certainly hope that Mr. Thornton’s permit has been rescinded!
William Klopfenstein
Edwardsville


The “no questions policy” was some what comical. If I remember correctly they offered 50 dollars for long guns and 75 or 100 for hand guns, this price way off for the true market for these firearms. At local gun show a beat up gun can cost several hundred dollars. The real outcry came from people who had firearms stolen from them. This allowed stolen firearms returned for cash. This is something they prosecute pawn shops for. The destruction of the firearms was to be done before the serial number could be traced, and the group running the project had no intention of reimbursing the victim of theft. This is where the question of legality came into play.